Cited by 229Water-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesClimate Change Policy and Economics

Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future

Open access
Fuhrman, Jay, McJeon, Haewon, Patel, Pralit, Doney, Scott C., Shobe, William M., Clarens, Andres F.·2020·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-020-0876-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct air carbon capture technology can achieve negative emissions of 3 Gt CO2yr−1 by 2035 at current pricing and efficiency levels.

    “According to the study, direct air carbon capture technology can achieve negative emissions of 3 Gt CO2yr−1 by 2035 at current pricing and efficiency levels.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Fuhrman et al. 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 229

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. NRC. Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. Natl. Acad. Press (2015). doi:10.17226/18988 · DOI
  2. Realmonte, G. et al. An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 3277 (2019).
  3. BP. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. (2019).

Authors
Fuhrman, J., McJeon, H., Patel, P., Doney, S. C., Shobe, W. M., & Clarens, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
920-927
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W3080641105
Cited by
229
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Virginia Environmental Resilience Institute
  • University of Virginia Environmental Resilience Institute and 3 Cavalier Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
negative emissions technologies, direct air capture, water-energy-food nexus, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, afforestation, land use competition, energy demand, water demand, equity concerns, Global South

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review