Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antagonistic pleiotropy and mutation accumulation influence human senescence and disease

Rodríguez, Juan Antonio, Marigorta, Urko M., Hughes, David A., Spataro, Nino, Bosch, Elena, Navarro, Arcadi·2017·Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Senescence has long been a public health challenge as well as a fascinating evolutionary problem. There is neither a universally accepted theory for its ultimate causes, nor a consensus about what may be its impact on human health. Here we test the predictions of two evolutionary explanations of senescence-mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy-which postulate that genetic variants with harmful effects in old ages can be tolerated, or even favoured, by natural selection at early ages. Using data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we study the effects of genetic variants associated with diseases appearing at different periods in life, when they are expected to have different impacts on fitness. Data fit theoretical expectations. Namely, we observe higher risk allele frequencies combined with large effect sizes for late-onset diseases, and detect a significant excess of early-late antagonistically pleiotropic variants that, strikingly, tend to be harboured by genes related to ageing. Beyond providing systematic, genome-wide evidence for evolutionary theories of senescence in our species and contributing to the long-standing question of whether senescence is the result of adaptation, our approach reveals relationships between previously unrelated pathologies, potentially contributing to tackling the problem of an ageing population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-016-0055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Fontana, L. & Kennedy, B. K. Treat ageing. Nature 511, 405–407 (2014). · DOI
  2. Trindade, L. S. et al. A novel classification system for evolutionary aging theories. Front. Genet. 4, 1–8 (2013). · DOI
  3. Medawar, P. B. An Unsolved Problem of Biology: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at University College, London, 6 December, 1951 (H. K. Lewis, 1952).
  4. Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411 (1957). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kirkwood, T. B. Evolution of ageing. Nature 170, 201–204 (1977).
  6. Charlesworth, B. Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 47–65 (2001). · DOI
  7. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980).
  8. Moorad, J. A. & Hall, D. W. Age-dependent mutational effects curtail the evolution of senescence by antagonistic pleiotropy. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2409–2419 (2009). · DOI
  9. Kirkwood, T. B. & Holliday, R. The evolution of ageing and longevity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205, 531–546 (1979). · DOI
  10. Gavrilov, L. A. & Gavrilova, N. S. Evolutionary theories of aging and longevity. ScientificWorldJournal 2, 339–356 (2002). · DOI
  11. Flatt, T. Survival costs of reproduction in Drosophila . Exp. Gerontol. 46, 369–375 (2011). · DOI
  12. Flatt, T. Ageing: diet and longevity in the balance. Nature 462, 989–990 (2009). · DOI
  13. Stearns, S. C., Ackermann, M., Doebli, M. & Kaiser, M. Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruit flies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3309–3313 (2000). · DOI
  14. Albin, R. L. Antagonistic pleiotropy, mutation accumulation, and human genetic disease. Genetica 91, 279–286 (1993). · DOI
  15. Mailman, M. D. et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 39, 1181–1186 (2007). · DOI
  16. Lappalainen, I. et al. The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research. Nat. Genet. 47, 692–695 (2015). · DOI
  17. Welter, D. et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D1001–D1006 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marigorta, U. M. & Navarro, A. High trans-ethnic replicability of GWAS results implies common causal variants. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003566 (2013). · DOI
  19. Azer, S. A. Mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases: how useful are medical textbooks, eMedicine, and YouTube? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 38, 124–134 (2014). · DOI
  20. Carey, J. R. Longevity: The Biology and Demography of Life Span (Princeton Univ. Press, 2003). · DOI
  21. McHenry, H. M. Tempo and mode in human evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6780–6786 (1994). · DOI
  22. Caspari, R. & Lee, S.-H. Older age becomes common late in human evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10895–10900 (2004). · DOI
  23. de Magalhães, J. P., Curado, J. & Church, G. M. Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging. Bioinformatics 25, 875–881 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  24. de Magalhães, J. P. et al. The human ageing genomic resources: online databases and tools for biogerontologists. Aging Cell 8, 65–72 (2009). · DOI
  25. Harries, L. W. et al. Human aging is characterized by focused changes in gene expression and deregulation of alternative splicing. Aging Cell 10, 868–878 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Heyn, H. et al. Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10522–10527 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Raj, T. et al. Common risk alleles for inflammatory diseases are targets of recent positive selection. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92, 517–529 (2013). · DOI
  28. Hancock, A. M. et al. Adaptations to climate-mediated selective pressures in humans. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001375 (2011). · DOI
  29. Dulai, K. S., Von Dornum, M., Mollon, J. D. & Hunt, D. M. The evolution of trichromatic color vision by opsin gene duplication in new world and old world primates. Genome Res. 9, 629–638 (1999). · DOI
  30. Pybus, M. et al. Hierarchical boosting: a machine-learning framework to detect and classify hard selective sweeps in human populations. Bioinformatics 31, 3946–3952 (2015). · DOI
  31. Tabarés-Seisdedos, R. et al. No paradox, no progress: inverse cancer comorbidity in people with other complex diseases. Lancet Oncol. 12, 604–608 (2011). · DOI
  32. Jensen, A. B. et al. Temporal disease trajectories condensed from population-wide registry data covering 6.2 million patients. Nat. Commun. 5, 4022 (2014). · DOI
  33. Egle, J. P., Smeenge, D. M., Kassem, K. M. & Mittal, V. K. The Internet school of medicine: use of electronic resources by medical trainees and the reliability of those resources. J. Surg. Educ. 72, 316–320 (2015). · DOI
  34. Solovieff, N., Cotsapas, C., Lee, P. H., Purcell, S. M. & Smoller, J. W. Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 483–495 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Paaby, A. B. & Rockman, M. V. The many faces of pleiotropy. Trends Genet. 29, 66–73 (2013). · DOI
  36. Abecasis, G. R. et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Park, J.-H. et al. Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat. Genet. 42, 570–575 (2010). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez, J. A., Marigorta, U. M., Hughes, D. A., Spataro, N., Bosch, E., & Navarro, A.
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2017-01-30
Volume
1
Issue
3
ISSN
2397-334X
Cited by
108
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review