Cited by 737Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging

Open access
de Magalhães, João Pedro, Curado, João, Church, George M.·2009·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Numerous microarray studies of aging have been conducted, yet given the noisy nature of gene expression changes with age, elucidating the transcriptional features of aging and how these relate to physiological, biochemical and pathological changes remains a critical problem. Results: We performed a meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles using 27 datasets from mice, rats and humans. Our results reveal several common signatures of aging, including 56 genes consistently overexpressed with age, the most significant of which was APOD, and 17 genes underexpressed with age. We characterized the biological processes associated with these signatures and found that age-related gene expression changes most notably involve an overexpression of inflammation and immune response genes and of genes associated with the lysosome. An underexpression of collagen genes and of genes associated with energy metabolism, particularly mitochondrial genes, as well as alterations in the expression of genes related to apoptosis, cell cycle and cellular senescence biomarkers, were also observed. By employing a new method that emphasizes sensitivity, our work further reveals previously unknown transcriptional changes with age in many genes, processes and functions. We suggest these molecular signatures reflect a combination of degenerative processes but also transcriptional responses to the process of aging. Overall, our results help to understand how transcriptional changes relate to the process of aging and could serve as targets for future studies. Availability: http://genomics.senescence.info/uarrays/signatures.html Contact: jp@senescence.info Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp073

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These SASP cells showed enrichment of previously published gene sets indicative of human and cellular aging.

    “as well as enrichment of previously published gene sets indicative of human49 and cellular aging50 (Table 2).”
  • NF-κB pathway activation is a recognized transcriptional signature driving chronic inflammation in aged skin, muscle, bone and nervous system.

    “Activation of the NF-κB pathway is a known transcriptional signature that mediates chronic inflammation in aged skin, skeletal muscle, bone and nervous system163, although the direct effects of NF-κB activation on stem function in these tissues is still under investigation.”
  • Zahn et al. reported aging-driven upregulation of ribosomal genes in human brain and muscle tissues and later upregulation in mouse neuronal tissues but downregulation in non-neuronal tissues.

    “Zahn et al. reported an aging-driven upregulation of ribosomal genes in human brain and muscle tissues 37 and, in a later study, reported an aging-driven upregulation of ribosomal genes in mouse neuronal tissues 6 but a downregulation of the same genes in non-neuronal tissues 6 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Magalhães, J. P., Curado, J., & Church, G. M.
Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA and 2Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, 4200 Porto, Portugal
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2009-02-02
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
875-881
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2108700752
Cited by
737
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 40
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
aging, age-related gene expression, gene expression signatures, apolipoprotein D, inflammation, immune response genes, lysosomes, collagen genes, energy metabolism, mitochondrial genes, apoptosis, cell cycle, cellular senescence, meta-analysis of microarray data
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review