The skull roof tracks the brain during the evolution and development of reptiles including birds
Open accessAbstract
Major transformations in brain size and proportions, such as the enlargement of the brain during the evolution of birds, are accompanied by profound modifications to the skull roof. However, the hypothesis of concerted evolution of shape between brain and skull roof over major phylogenetic transitions, and in particular of an ontogenetic relationship between specific regions of the brain and the skull roof, has never been formally tested. We performed 3D morphometric analyses to examine the deep history of brain and skull-roof morphology in Reptilia, focusing on changes during the well-documented transition from early reptiles through archosauromorphs, including nonavian dinosaurs, to birds. Non-avialan taxa cluster tightly together in morphospace, whereas Archaeopteryx and crown birds occupy a separate region. There is a one-to-one correspondence between the forebrain and frontal bone and the midbrain and parietal bone. Furthermore, the position of the forebrain-midbrain boundary correlates significantly with the position of the frontoparietal suture across the phylogenetic breadth of Reptilia and during the ontogeny of individual taxa. Conservation of position and identity in the skull roof is apparent, and there is no support for previous hypotheses that the avian parietal is a transformed postparietal. The correlation and apparent developmental link between regions of the brain and bony skull elements are likely to be ancestral to Tetrapoda and may be fundamental to all of Osteichthyes, coeval with the origin of the dermatocranium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The morphogenic primacy of the brain in the development of the cranium may contribute to the relatively limited variation in evolutionary rates observed in the vault in this study.
“For example, the morphogenic primacy of the brain in the development of the cranium (39) may contribute to the relatively limited variation in evolutionary rates observed in the vault in this study.”
From Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
<b>NbClust</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06 · Cited by 3,396 · see citing works
A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing
Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Lemmon, E. M., & Lemmon, A. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19417 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Self-citationBrusatte, S. L., Lloyd, G. T., Wang, S. C., & Norell, M. A. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.034 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolutionary origins of the avian brain
Balanoff, A. M., Bever, G. S., Rowe, T. B., & Norell, M. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12424 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms that underlie co‐variation of the brain and face
Marcucio, R. S., Young, N. M., Hu, D., & Hallgrimsson, B. (2011) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.20710 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium
Felice, R. N., & Goswami, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716437115 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
“the development of the cranium (39) may contribute to the relatively limited variation in evolutionary rates observed in the vault in this study.”
Background
- Authors
- Fabbri, M., Mongiardino Koch, N., Pritchard, A. C., Hanson, M., Hoffman, E., Bever, G. S., Balanoff, A. M., Morris, Z. S., Field, D. J., Camacho, J., Rowe, T. B., Norell, M. A., Smith, R. M., Abzhanov, A., & Bhullar, B.-A. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Iziko Museums of South Africa (ZA)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fabbri, Matteo
- Abzhanov, Arhat
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2017-09-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1543-1550
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2756279390
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
- Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- skull roof, brain evolution, reptile brain, avian brain, ontogeny, parietal bone, frontal bone, archosauromorphs, Archaeopteryx, 3D morphometrics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Brain, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Reptiles, Skull, Dinosaurs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review