Cited by 3,396Advanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsData Analysis with R

NbClust : An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set

Open access
Charrad, Malika, Ghazzali, Nadia, Boiteau, Véronique, Niknafs, Azam·2014·Journal of Statistical Software

Abstract

Clustering is the partitioning of a set of objects into groups (clusters) so that objects within a group are more similar to each others than objects in different groups. Most of the clustering algorithms depend on some assumptions in order to define the subgroups present in a data set. As a consequence, the resulting clustering scheme requires some sort of evaluation as regards its validity. The evaluation procedure has to tackle difficult problems such as the quality of clusters, the degree with which a clustering scheme fits a specific data set and the optimal number of clusters in a partitioning. In the literature, a wide variety of indices have been proposed to find the optimal number of clusters in a partitioning of a data set during the clustering process. However, for most of indices proposed in the literature, programs are unavailable to test these indices and compare them. The R package NbClust has been developed for that purpose. It provides 30 indices which determine the number of clusters in a data set and it offers also the best clustering scheme from different results to the user. In addition, it provides a function to perform k-means and hierarchical clustering with different distance measures and aggregation methods. Any combination of validation indices and clustering methods can be requested in a single function call. This enables the user to simultaneously evaluate several clustering schemes while varying the number of clusters, to help determining the most appropriate number of clusters for the data set of interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18637/jss.v061.i06

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A.
Affiliations
Centre d'études et de recherche en informatique et communications (FR)
Venue
Journal of Statistical Software
Published
2014
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
1-36
ISSN
1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1944603233
Cited by
3,396
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 256 · 2025: 403 · 2024: 411 · 2023: 455 · 2022: 435 · 2021: 421 · 2020: 418 · 2019: 216 · 2018: 167 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
71.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Statistical Software (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
Keywords
optimal number of clusters, cluster validity indices, cluster validation, K-means clustering, hierarchical clustering, R package, distance measures, aggregation methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review