Breakdown of brain–body allometry and the encephalization of birds and mammals
Abstract
The allometric relationship between brain and body size among vertebrates is often considered a manifestation of evolutionary constraints. However, birds and mammals have undergone remarkable encephalization, in which brain size has increased without corresponding changes in body size. Here, we explore the hypothesis that a reduction of phenotypic integration between brain and body size has facilitated encephalization in birds and mammals. Using a large dataset comprising 20,213 specimens across 4,587 species of jawed vertebrates, we show that the among-species (evolutionary) brain-body allometries are remarkably constant, both across vertebrate classes and across taxonomic levels. Birds and mammals, however, are exceptional in that their within-species (static) allometries are shallower and more variable than in other vertebrates. These patterns are consistent with the idea that birds and mammals have reduced allometric constraints that are otherwise ubiquitous across jawed vertebrates. Further exploration of ontogenetic allometries in selected taxa of birds, fishes and mammals reveals that birds and mammals have extended the period of fetal brain growth compared to fishes. Based on these findings, we propose that avian and mammalian encephalization has been contingent on increased variability in brain growth patterns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ectothermic vertebrates vary between 0.4 and 0.5 within species.
“The latter vary between 0.4 and 0.5 within species [Tsuboi et al., 2018].”
From A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size Measure for Comparative Primate Cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Tsuboi et al., 2018
This study confirms that the effect of body size on the size of the somatic brain (the 2-point slope) varies considerably between mammals (and presumably birds) and ectothermic vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, and reptiles).
“Nevertheless, this study confirms that the effect of body size on the size of the somatic brain (the 2-point slope) varies considerably between mammals (and presumably birds) [Tsuboi et al., 2018] on the one hand and ectothermic vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, and reptiles) on the other hand.”
From A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size Measure for Comparative Primate Cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Tsuboi et al., 2018
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis
Bouckaert, R., Heled, J., Kühnert, D., Vaughan, T., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., Suchard, M. A., Rambaut, A., & Drummond, A. J. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 · Cited by 6,527 · see citing works
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977 · see citing works
Maternal investment, life histories and the costs of brain growth in mammals
Barton, R. A., & Capellini, I. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019140108 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION
Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12197 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Bigger Brains Led to Bigger Bodies?: The Correlated Evolution of Human Brain and Body Size
Grabowski, M. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/685655 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Grabowski, M., Voje, K. L., & Hansen, T. F. (2016) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.03.001 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Schaik, C. P., Triki, Z., Bshary, R., & Heldstab, S. A. (2021) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000517013 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tsuboi, M., van der Bijl, W., Kopperud, B. T., Erritzøe, J., Voje, K. L., Kotrschal, A., Yopak, K. E., Collin, S. P., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Kolm, N.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Tsuboi, Masahito
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2018-08-13
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1492-1500
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885507815
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Keywords
- brain-body allometry, encephalization, brain size, birds, mammals, phenotypic integration, ontogenetic allometry, fetal brain development, jawed vertebrates, brain size evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Brain, Biological Evolution, Female, Male, Mammals, Phylogeny, Poecilia, Body Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review