Macroevolutionary shift in the size of amphibian genomes and the role of life history and climate
Abstract
The evolution and great diversity of genome size has been of long-standing interest to biologists, but has seldom been investigated on a broad phylogenetic scale. Here we present a comparative quantitative analysis of factors shaping genome size evolution in amphibians, the extant class of vertebrates with the largest variation in genome size. We find that amphibian genomes have undergone saltations in size, although these are rare and the evolutionary history of genome size in amphibians has otherwise been one of gradual, time-dependent variation (that is, Brownian motion). This macroevolutionary homogeneity is remarkable given the evolutionary and ecological diversity of most other aspects of the natural history of amphibians. Contrary to previous claims, we find no evidence for associations between life cycle complexity and genome size despite the high diversity of reproductive modes and the multiple events of independent evolution of divergent life cycles in the group. Climate (temperature and humidity) affects genome size indirectly, at least in frogs, as a consequence of its effect on premetamorphic developmental period, although directionality of the relationship between developmental period and genome size is not unequivocal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decoupling of genome size from body size reduction is consistent with the broader C-value enigma, reinforcing that genome size evolution is governed by mechanisms largely independent of organismal size or complexity.
“This decoupling of genome size from body size reduction is consistent with the broader C-value enigma, reinforcing that genome size evolution is governed by mechanisms largely independent of organismal size or complexity (47, 48).”
From Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world’s smallest fishes (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Genome size is tightly coupled to cell size and, in turn, to cell-division and developmental rate across fishes and other vertebrates.
“Genome size is tightly coupled to cell size and, in turn, to cell-division and developmental rate across fishes and other vertebrates (e.g., refs. 47, 48, 52, and 54).”
From Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world’s smallest fishes (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Across amphibians, genome size is linked to developmental rate rather than to life-cycle mode per se: species with shorter developmental periods have smaller genomes, consistent with selection reducing genome size where rapid development is favored.
“Across amphibians, genome size is linked to developmental rate rather than to life-cycle mode per se: species with shorter developmental periods have smaller genomes, consistent with selection reducing genome size where rapid development is favored (48).”
From Convergent genome streamlining accompanies independent miniaturization in the world’s smallest fishes (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Cites
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sudasinghe, H., Matschiner, M., Britz, R., Conway, K. W., Tan, H. H., Salzburger, W., Peichel, C. L., & Rüber, L. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2614605123
- Authors
- Liedtke, H. C., Gower, D. J., Wilkinson, M., & Gomez-Mestre, I.
- Affiliations
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2018-09-24
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1792-1799
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892635007
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- genome size evolution, amphibians, macroevolution, life history, reproductive mode, frogs, Brownian motion, saltation, temperature and humidity
- MeSH terms
- Life History Traits, Animals, Anura, Climate, Biological Evolution, Genome, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review