Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examples exist demonstrating how frameworks such as Two-Eyed Seeing can and have led to legislated spatial closures for larger scale commercial fisheries.
“However, examples do exist demonstrating how such frameworks can and have led to legislated spatial closures for larger scale commercial fisheries (Ban et al., 2018).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Ban et al., 2018
Cites
Berkes, F. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315114644 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Adams, M. S., Carpenter, J., Housty, J. A., Neasloss, D., Paquet, P. C., Service, C., Walkus, J., & Darimont, C. T. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06569-190305 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Self-citationService, C. N., Bourbonnais, M., Adams, M. S., Henson, L., Neasloss, D., Picard, C., Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T. (2020) · Ecological Solutions and Evidence · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12014 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ban, N. C., Frid, A., Reid, M., Edgar, B., Shaw, D., & Siwallace, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ban, Natalie C.
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2018-10-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1680-1683
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896944500
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 40.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- indigenous knowledge, social-ecological systems, conservation policy, resource management
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Research Design, Population Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
