Cited by 15Genetic diversity and population structureWildlife Ecology and ConservationGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Spatial patterns and rarity of the white‐phased ‘Spirit bear’ allele reveal gaps in habitat protection

Open access
Service, Christina N., Bourbonnais, Mathieu, Adams, Megan S., Henson, Lauren, Neasloss, Douglas, Picard, Chris, Paquet, Paul C., Darimont, Chris T.·2020·Ecological Solutions and Evidence

Abstract

1. Preserving genetic and phenotypic diversity can help safeguard not only biodiversity but also cultural and economic values. 2. Here, we present data that emerged from Indigenous‐led research at the intersection of evolution and ecology to support conservation planning of a culturally salient, economically valuable, and rare phenotypic variant. We addressed three conservation objectives for the white‐phased ‘Spirit bear’ polymorphism, a rare and endemic white‐coated phenotype of black bear ( Ursus americanus ) in Kitasoo/Xai'xais and Gitga'at Territories and beyond in coastal British Columbia, Canada. First, we used non‐invasively collected hair samples ( n = 385 bears over ∼18,000 km 2 ) to assess the spatial variation in the frequency of the allele that controls the white‐coloured morph (mc1r). Second, we compared our observed allele frequencies at mc1r with those expected under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Finally, we examined how well current protected areas in the region aligned with spatial hotspots of Spirit bear alleles. 3. We found that landscape‐level allele frequency was lower than previously reported. For example our systematic sampling estimated a frequency of 0.25 (95% CI [0.13, 0.41]) on Gribbell Island compared with the previously reported estimate of 0.56. Also, in contrast with previous reports, we failed to detect a statistically significant departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at mc1r, which calls into question the previously posited role of homozygote gene flow, heterozygote disadvantage, and positive assortative mating in the maintenance of this polymorphism. Finally, we found a discrepancy between the placement of protected areas and the 90th percentile hotspots (upper 10% of all estimated values) of Spirit bear alleles, with ∼50% of hotspots falling outside of protected areas. 4. These results provide new insight into hypotheses related to the maintenance of this rare polymorphism, and directly relevant information to support evidence‐based opportunities for Indigenous Nations of the area to attend to gaps in conservation planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2688-8319.12014

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reverence for and cultural significance of the Kermode bear color polymorphism to the Kitasoo/Xai'Xais and Gitga'at First Nations resulted in the legal establishment of the ~1,000 km2 'Kitasoo Bear Conservancy,' protecting Kermode bears while promoting greater conservation of black bears within the Great Bear Rainforest.

    “The reverence for and cultural significance of this color polymorphism to the Kitasoo/Xai'Xais and Gitga'at First Nations resulted in the legal establishment of the ~ 1,000 km 2 'Kitasoo Bear Conservancy,' protecting Kermode bears while promoting greater conservation of black bears within the Great Bear Rainforest (Langlois, 2017;Service et al., 2020).”

    From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Service et al., 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Forsman, A., Ahnesjo, J., Caeser, S., & Karlsson, M. (2008). A model of eco- logical and evolutionary consequences of color polymorphisms. Ecology, 89(1), 34-40.
  2. Futuyma, D. J. (1997). Evolutionary biology (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  3. Hardy, G. H. (1908). Mendelian proportions in a mixed proportion. In J. A. Peters (Ed.), Classic papers in genetics (pp. 60-62). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Harestad, A. (2007). Potential for gene swamping in Kermode bears on Princess Royal Island. Kermode Bear Scientific Panel, Workshop Summary Report. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
  5. Polfus, J. L., Manseau, M., Simmons, D., Neyelle, M., Bayha, W., Andrew, F., & Andrew, L. (2016). Łegha ǵots'enete (learning together): The impor- tance of Indigenous perspectives in the identification of biological vari- ation. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 18.
  6. Saunders, N. J. (1998). Icons of power: Feline symbolism in the Americas. Lon- don, UK: Routledge.
  7. Sikes, R., & Gannon, W. (2011). Guidelines of the American Society of Mam- malogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 235-253.
  8. Woods, J. G., Paetkau, D., Lewis, D., Mclellan, B. N., Proctor, M., & Strobeck, C. (1999). Genetic tagging of black bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 616-627.
  9. Zurba, M., Beazley, K. F., English, E., & Buchmann-Duck, J. (2019). Aichi Tar- get 11 and Canada's pathway to Target 1: Focusing conservation on rec- onciliation. Land, 8(10), 1-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Service, C. N., Bourbonnais, M., Adams, M. S., Henson, L., Neasloss, D., Picard, C., Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
  • Kitasoo Xai'xais Stewardship Authority Kitasoo/Xai'xais First Nation Klemtu British Columbia Canada
  • Gitga'at Oceans and Lands Department Gitga'at First Nation Hartley Bay British Columbia Canada
Corresponding author
Service, Christina N.
Venue
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-05
Volume
1
Issue
2
ISSN
2688-8319 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039576011
Cited by
15
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Solutions and Evidence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
Ursus americanus, allele frequency, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, spatial genetic variation, protected area gaps, conservation planning, Indigenous-led research, British Columbia coast, hair sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review