Curb land grabbing to save the Amazon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Colombia's Amazon-Andes frontier, clearing forests for pasture and introducing cattle remains the most effective way to secure credit and institutional support to formalize plot boundaries and tenure.
“In Colombia's Amazon-Andes frontier, clearing forests for pasture and introducing cattle remains the most effective way to secure credit and institutional support to formalize plot boundaries and tenure (Armenteras et al., 2019).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Armenteras et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Armenteras, D., Negret, P., Melgarejo, L. F., Lakes, T. M., Londoño, M. C., García, J., Krueger, T., Baumann, M., & Davalos, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute (CO)
- Corresponding author
- Armenteras, Dolors
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2019-10-28
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1497-1497
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981457577
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine | National Academy of Sciences (2000007526)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, KOSMOS Workshop “Post-conflict scenarios of land-use in Colombia”
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- land grabbing, Amazon deforestation, Colombia, land inequality, rural population, civil conflict, land use policy, land distribution
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
