The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night
Open accessAbstract
Natural light cycles are being eroded over large areas of the globe by the direct emissions and sky brightening that result from sources of artificial night-time light. This is predicted to affect wild organisms, particularly because of the central role that light regimes play in determining the timing of biological activity. Although many empirical studies have reported such effects, these have focused on particular species or local communities and have thus been unable to provide a general evaluation of the overall frequency and strength of these impacts. Using a new database of published studies, we show that exposure to artificial light at night induces strong responses for physiological measures, daily activity patterns and life history traits. We found particularly strong responses with regards to hormone levels, the onset of daily activity in diurnal species and life history traits, such as the number of offspring, predation, cognition and seafinding (in turtles). So far, few studies have focused on the impact of artificial light at night on ecosystem functions. The breadth and often strength of biological impacts we reveal highlight the need for outdoor artificial night-time lighting to be limited to the places and forms—such as timing, intensity and spectrum—where it is genuinely required by the people using it to minimize ecological impacts. A meta-analysis of 126 published studies shows that exposure to artificial light at night induces strong responses for physiological measures, daily activity patterns and life history traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmmR Package
Hadfield, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02 · Cited by 4,799
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
(2005) · doi:10.1002/0470870168 · Cited by 2,368
The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness
Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Duriscoe, D., Kyba, C. C. M., Elvidge, C. D., Baugh, K., Portnov, B. A., Rybnikova, N. A., & Furgoni, R. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600377 · Cited by 1,646
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033242 · Cited by 1,500
The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal
Gaston, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., & Hopkins, J. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12036 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationMethodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis
Nakagawa, S., & Santos, E. S. A. (2012) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9555-5 · Cited by 1,032
Partitioning of time as an ecological resource
Kronfeld-Schor, N., & Dayan, T. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435 · Cited by 1,021 · cited 2×
“The dataset includes almost double the number of field studies (82) compared to laboratory experiments (42), with the majority of field studies in the meta-analysis from Europe (46), North America (17) and Australia (7).”
ResultArtificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent
Kyba, C. C. M., Kuester, T., Sánchez de Miguel, A., Baugh, K., Jechow, A., Hölker, F., Bennie, J., Elvidge, C. D., Gaston, K. J., & Guanter, L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701528 · Cited by 948
Self-citationHadfield, J. D., & Nakagawa, S. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x · Cited by 822
Cited by
Quintanilla-Ahumada, D., Quijón, P. A., Jahnsen-Guzmán, N., Zúñiga-Cueto, N., Miranda-Benabarre, C., Lynn, K. D., Pulgar, J., Palma, J., Manríquez, P. H., & Duarte, C. (2024) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116924 · Cited by 10
Dissegna, A., & Chiandetti, C. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249626 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanders, D., Frago, E., Kehoe, R., Patterson, C., & Gaston, K. J.
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2020-11-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-81
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092599428
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41559-020-01322-x
- The paper
- Sanders, D., Frago, E., Kehoe, R., Patterson, C., & Gaston, K. J. (2020). A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night. Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01322-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.