Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nickel ferrocyanide as a high-performance urea oxidation electrocatalyst

Open access
Geng, Shi-Kui, Zheng, Yao, Li, Shan-Qing, Su, Hui, Zhao, Xu, Hu, Jun, Shu, Hai-Bo, Jaroniec, Mietek, Chen, Ping, Liu, Qing-Hua, Qiao, Shi-Zhang·2021·Nature Energy

Abstract

Urea is often present in waste water but can be used in powering fuel cells and as an alternative oxidation substrate to water in an electrolyser. However, an insufficient mechanistic understanding and the lack of efficient catalysts for the urea oxidation reaction have hampered the development of such applications. Here we demonstrate that a nickel ferrocyanide (Ni2Fe(CN)6) catalyst supported on Ni foam can drive the urea oxidation reaction with a higher activity and better stability than those of conventional Ni-based catalysts. Our experimental and computational data suggest a urea oxidation reaction pathway different from most other Ni-based catalysts that comprise NiOOH derivatives as the catalytically active compound. Ni2Fe(CN)6 appears to be able to directly facilitate a two-stage reaction pathway that involves an intermediate ammonia production (on the Ni site) and its decomposition to N2 (on the Fe site). Owing to the different rate-determining steps with more favourable thermal/kinetic energetics, Ni2Fe(CN)6 achieves a 100 mA cm−2 anodic current density at a potential of 1.35 V (equal to an overpotential of 0.98 V). Urea oxidation could be a lower-energy alternative to water oxidation in hydrogen-producing electrolysers, but improved catalysts are required to facilitate the reaction. Geng et al. report nickel ferrocyanide as a promising catalyst and suggest that it operates via a different pathway to that of previous materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-021-00899-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Geng, S.-K., Zheng, Y., Li, S.-Q., Su, H., Zhao, X., Hu, J., Shu, H.-B., Jaroniec, M., Chen, P., Liu, Q.-H., & Qiao, S.-Z.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
904-912
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200767026
Cited by
723
References
5
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nickel ferrocyanide as a high-performance urea oxidation electrocatalyst. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41560-021-00899-2
The paper
Geng, S.-K., Zheng, Y., Li, S.-Q., Su, H., Zhao, X., Hu, J., Shu, H.-B., Jaroniec, M., Chen, P., Liu, Q.-H., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2021). Nickel ferrocyanide as a high-performance urea oxidation electrocatalyst. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00899-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.