CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 335Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsMembrane Separation and Gas Transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fuel cells with an operational range of –20 °C to 200 °C enabled by phosphoric acid-doped intrinsically ultramicroporous membranes

Open access
Tang, Hongying, Geng, Kang, Wu, Lei, Liu, Junjie, Chen, Zhiquan, You, Wei, Yan, Feng, Guiver, Michael D., Li, Nanwen·2022·Nature Energy
DOI 10.1038/s41560-021-00956-w

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-021-00956-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Devanathan, R. Recent developments in proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 1, 101–119 (2008). · DOI
  2. Çelik, S. Ü. et al. Alternatives toward proton conductive anhydrous membranes for fuel cells: heterocyclic protogenic solvents comprising polymer electrolytes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37, 1265–1291 (2012). · DOI
  3. Mauritz, K. A. et al. State of understanding of Nafion. Chem. Rev. 104, 4535–4585 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhang, J. et al. High temperature PEM fuel cells. J. Power Sources 160, 872–891 (2006). · DOI
  5. Zhu, Y. et al. Performance comparison between high temperature and traditional proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J. Power Sources 256, 250–257 (2014). · DOI
  6. Schmidt, T. J. et al. Durability and reliability in high-temperature reformed hydrogen PEFCs. ECS Trans. 3, 861–869 (2006). · DOI
  7. Bose, S. et al. Polymer membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell: recent advances and challenges. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 813–843 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li, Q. et al. High temperature proton exchange membranes based on polybenzimidazoles for fuel cells. Prog. Polym. Sci. 34, 449–477 (2009). · DOI
  9. Ma, Y. L. et al. Conductivity of PBI membranes for high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A8–A16 (2004). · DOI
  10. Yu, S. et al. Durability studies of PBI-based high temperature PEMFCs. Fuel Cells 8, 165–174 (2008). · DOI
  11. Li, Q. et al. PBI-based polymer membranes for high temperature fuel cells—preparation, characterization and fuel cell demonstration. Fuel Cells 4, 147–158 (2004). · DOI
  12. Xiao, L. et al. High-temperature polybenzimidazole fuel cell membranes via a sol-gel process. Chem. Mater. 17, 5328–5333 (2005). · DOI
  13. Kim, J. et al. Durability of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells in daily based start/stop operation mode using reformed gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40, 7769–7776 (2015). · DOI
  14. Lang, S. et al. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of the electrolyte loss in a HT-PEM fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40, 1163–1172 (2015). · DOI
  15. Wei, L. et al. Numerical study of cold start performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with coolant circulation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 22160–22172 (2019). · DOI
  16. Oszcipok, M. et al. Portable proton exchange membrane fuel-cell systems for outdoor applications. J. Power Sources 157, 666–673 (2006). · DOI
  17. Amamou, A. A. et al. Comprehensive review of solutions and strategies for cold start of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cells. IEEE Access 4, 4989–5002 (2016). · DOI
  18. Maruo, T. et al. Development of fuel cell system control for sub-zero ambient conditions. SAE Technical Paper Series, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1189 (2017). · DOI
  19. Jiang, W. et al. Study on fast cold start-up method of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on electric heating technology. Energies 13, 4456–4471 (2020). · DOI
  20. Wen, J. et al. Alternate hydrogen pump method enables start-up from −30 °C for graphite-bipolar-plate proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, F1112–F1116 (2019). · DOI
  21. Lee, K.-S. et al. An operationally flexible fuel cell based on quaternary ammonium-biphosphate ion pairs. Nat. Energy 1, 16120–16126 (2016). · DOI
  22. Lee, K.-S. et al. Intermediate temperature fuel cells via an ion-pair coordinated polymer electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 979–987 (2018). · DOI
  23. Lee, A. S. et al. The energetics of phosphoric acid interactions reveals a new acid loss mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 9867–9876 (2019). · DOI
  24. Atanasov, V. et al. Synergistically integrated phosphonated poly(pentafluorostyrene) for fuel cells. Nat. Mater. 20, 370–377 (2021). · DOI
  25. McKeown, N. B. et al. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): organic materials for membrane separations, heterogeneous catalysis and hydrogen storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 675–683 (2006). · DOI
  26. Carta, M. et al. An efficient polymer molecular sieve for membrane gas separations. Science 339, 303–307 (2013). · DOI
  27. Zuo, P. et al. Sulfonated microporous polymer membranes with fast and selective ion transport for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 9564–9573 (2020). · DOI
  28. Yang, Z. et al. Highly conductive anion-exchange membranes from microporous Tröger’s base polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 11499–11502 (2016). · DOI
  29. Tan, R. et al. Hydrophilic microporous membranes for selective ion separation and flow-battery energy storage. Nat. Mater. 19, 195–202 (2020). · DOI
  30. Patel, H. A. et al. Proton conduction in Tröger’s base-linked poly(crown ether)s. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 25303–25310 (2018). · DOI
  31. Liu, X. et al. Oriented proton-conductive nano-sponge-facilitated polymer electrolyte membranes. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 297–309 (2020). · DOI
  32. Zhou, S. et al. Alkaline polymers of intrinsic microporosity: high-conduction and low-loss anhydrous proton exchange membranes for energy conversion. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 3925–3930 (2021). · DOI
  33. Xu, Z. et al. Preparation and antifouling property improvement of Tröger’s base polymer ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 561, 59–68 (2018). · DOI
  34. Carta, M. et al. The synthesis of microporous polymers using Tröger’s base formation. Polym. Chem. 5, 5267–5272 (2014). · DOI
  35. Liao, K.-S. et al. Determination of free-volume properties in polymers without orthopositronium components in positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Macromolecules 44, 6818–6826 (2011). · DOI
  36. Provencher, S. W. Contin: a general purpose constrained regularization program for inverting noisy linear algebraic and integral equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 27, 229–242 (1982). · DOI
  37. Kirkegaard, P. et al. Program system for analysing positron lifetime spectra and angular correlation curves. Comput. Phys. Commun. 23, 307–335 (1981). · DOI
  38. Thommes, M. Physical adsorption characterization of nanoporous materials. Chem. Ing. Tech. 82, 1059–1073 (2010). · DOI
  39. Sebastiani, D. Current densities and nucleus-independent chemical shift maps from reciprocal-space density functional perturbation theory calculations. ChemPhysChem 7, 164–175 (2006). · DOI
  40. Aihara, Y. et al. Ion conduction mechanisms and thermal properties of hydrated and anhydrous phosphoric acids studied with 1H, 2H, and 31P NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 24999–25006 (2006). · DOI
  41. Xu, Z. et al. 31P NMR study on some phosphorus-containing compounds. Chin. Chem. Lett. 11, 1057–1060 (2000).
  42. Harris, R. K. et al. Adsorption competition onto activated carbon, studied by magic-angle spinning NMR. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 2615–2618 (1996). · DOI
  43. Dickinson, L. M. et al. Oxygen-17 and deuterium NMR investigation into the adsorption of water on activated carbon. Magn. Reson. Chem. 38, 918–924 (2000). · DOI
  44. Zhang, E. et al. NMR analysis of phosphoric acid distribution in porous fuel cell catalysts. Chem. Commun. 57, 2547–2550 (2021). · DOI
  45. Chesnut, D. B. A theoretical study of 31P NMR chemical shielding models for concentrated phosphoric acid solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 11962–11966 (2005). · DOI
  46. Milic, M. et al. NMR quantification of hydrogen-bond-accepting ability for organic molecules. J. Org. Chem. 86, 6031–6043 (2021). · DOI
  47. Uosaki, K. et al. Conductivity of Nafion membranes at low temperatures. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 287, 163–169 (1990). · DOI
  48. Soboleva, T. et al. Investigation of the through-plane impedance technique for evaluation of anisotropy of proton conducting polymer membranes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 622, 145–152 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Aili, D. et al. Thermal curing of PBI membranes for high temperature PEM fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 5444–5453 (2012). · DOI
  50. Aili, D. et al. Polybenzimidazole‑based high‑temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: new insights and recent progress. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 3, 793–845 (2020). · DOI
  51. Haider, R. et al. High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: progress in advanced materials and key technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 1138–1187 (2021). · DOI
  52. Ogihara, W. et al. Proton-conducting ionic liquids based upon multivalent anions and alkylimidazolium cations. Chem. Commun. 3637–3639 (2006). · DOI
  53. Fernicola, A. et al. New types of Brönsted acid–base ionic liquids-based membranes for applications in PEMFCs. ChemPhysChem 8, 1103–1107 (2007). · DOI
  54. Yang, J. S. et al. High molecular weight polybenzimidazole membranes for high temperature PEMFC. Fuel Cells 14, 7–15 (2014). · DOI
  55. Tang, H. Y. et al. Synthesis and properties of phosphonated polysulfones for durable high-temperature proton exchange membranes fuel cell. J. Membr. Sci. 605, 118107 (2020). · DOI
  56. Marenich, A. V. et al. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6378–6396 (2009). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, H., Geng, K., Wu, L., Liu, J., Chen, Z., You, W., Yan, F., Guiver, M. D., & Li, N.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin Normal University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Soochow University (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • You, Wei
  • Guiver, Michael D.
  • Li, Nanwen
ORCID
Venue
Nature Energy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-01-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
153-162
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41560-021-00956-w
OpenAlex
W4206251629
Cited by
335
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 39
FWCI
19.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Energy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (20181102019, 52G15023, 21835005)
  • Nankai University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, phosphoric acid leaching, polybenzimidazole membranes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review