Cited by 483

Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply

Odenweller, Adrian, Ueckerdt, Falko, Nemet, Gregory F., Jensterle, Miha, Luderer, Gunnar·2022·Nature Energy

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-022-01097-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale adoption of hydrogen-based long-duration storage, comprising electrolyzers, caverns, and hydrogen turbines for reconversion, will likely have long lead times because of supply chain and permitting bottlenecks.

    “Importantly, large-scale adoption of hydrogen-based long-duration storage, comprising electrolyzers, caverns, and hydrogen turbines for reconversion, will likely have long lead times because of supply chain and permitting bottlenecks100,101.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Global Hydrogen Review 2021 (IEA, 2021).
  2. Luderer, G. et al. Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nat. Commun. 10, 5229 (2019).
  3. Ueckerdt, F. et al. On the cost competitiveness of blue and green hydrogen. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1436022/v1 (2022). · DOI
  4. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press of Glencoe, 1962).
  5. Jewell, J. & Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: is it too late to keep warming below 1.5 °C? WIREs Clim. Change 11, e621 (2020).
  6. Bi, S., Bauer, N. & Jewell, J. Dynamic evaluation of policy feasibility, feedbacks and the ambitions of COALitions. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-827021/v1 (2022). · DOI
  7. Madsen, D. N. & Hansen, J. P. Outlook of solar energy in Europe based on economic growth characteristics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 114, 109306 (2019).
  8. Lowe, R. J. & Drummond, P. Solar, wind and logistic substitution in global energy supply to 2050-barriers and implications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 153, 111720 (2022).
  9. Hanna, R., Abdulla, A., Xu, Y. & Victor, D. G. Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response to the climate crisis. Nat. Commun. 12, 368 (2021).
  10. Bogdanov, D. et al. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 227, 120467 (2021).
  11. Nemet, G. F. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation (Routledge, 2019).
  12. Arthur, W. B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1994).
  13. Brändle, G., Schönfisch, M. & Schulte, S. Estimating long-term global supply costs for low-carbon hydrogen. Appl. Energy 302, 117481 (2021).
  14. Lambert, M. EU Hydrogen Strategy-A Case for Urgent Action Towards Implementation (The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2020).
  15. Meng, J., Way, R., Verdolini, E. & Anadon, L. D. Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1917165118 (2021).
  16. Mowery, D. & Rosenberg, N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 8, 102-153 (1979).
  17. Hosseini, S. E. An outlook on the global development of renewable and sustainable energy at the time of COVID-19. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101633 (2020).
  18. Schlund, D., Schulte, S. & Sprenger, T. The who's who of a hydrogen market ramp-up: a stakeholder analysis for Germany. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 154, 111810 (2022).
  19. Biggins, F., Kataria, M., Roberts, D. & Brown, D. S. Green hydrogen investments: investigating the option to wait. Energy 241, 122842 (2022).
  20. Anadón, L. D., Baker, E. & Bosetti, V. Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions. Nat. Energy 2, 17071 (2017).
  21. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021 (BP, 2021); https://www.bp.com/en/ global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
  22. The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing Today's Opportunities (OECD, 2019); https:// doi.org/10.1787/1e0514c4-en · DOI · Paper page
  23. Fasihi, M., Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Techno-economic assessment of power-to-liquids (PtL) fuels production and global trading based on hybrid PV-Wind power plants. Energy Proc. 99, 243-268 (2016).
  24. Nemet, G. F. et al. Negative emissions-part 3: innovation and upscaling. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063003 (2018).
  25. George, J. F., Müller, V. P., Jenny, W. & Ragwitz, M. Is blue hydrogen a bridging technology?-The limits of a CO 2 price and the role of state induced price components for green hydrogen production in Germany. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3989639 (2021). · DOI
  26. Modley, R. Aviation Facts and Figures (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1945).
  27. Batel, S. Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: past, present and future. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101544 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odenweller, A., Ueckerdt, F., Nemet, G. F., Jensterle, M., & Luderer, G.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2022-09-08
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
854-865
ISSN
2058-7546
Cited by
483
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review