Cited by 90Integrated Energy Systems OptimizationClimate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Narrative-driven alternative roads to achieve mid-century CO2 net neutrality in Europe

Open access
Rodrigues, Renato, Pietzcker, Robert, Fragkos, Panagiotis, Price, James, McDowall, Will, Siskos, Pelopidas, Fotiou, Theofano, Luderer, Gunnar +1 more·2022·Energy

Abstract

The tightened climate mitigation targets of the EU green deal raise an important question: Which strategy should be used to achieve carbon emissions net neutrality? This study explores stakeholder-designed narratives of the future energy system development within the deep decarbonization context. European carbon net-neutrality goals are put under test in a model comparison exercise using state of the art Energy-Environment-Economy (E3) models: ETM-UCL, PRIMES and REMIND. Results show that while achieving the transition to carbon neutrality by mid-century is feasible under quite different future energy systems, some robust commonalities emerge. Electrification of end use sectors combined with large-scale expansion of renewable energy is a no-regret decision for all strategies; Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) plays an important role for achieving net-neutral targets under all scenarios, but is most relevant when demand-side changes are limited; hydrogen and synthetic fuels can be a relevant mitigation option for mid-century mitigation in hard-to-abate sectors; energy efficiency can reduce the supply system strain. Finally, high carbon prices (300–900€/tCO2) are needed under all strategies in order to achieve carbon net neutrality in 2050.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121908

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbon neutrality is technically feasible with future energy technologies by mid-century.

    “The findings indicated that carbon neutrality is technically feasible with future energy technologies by mid-century.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Rodrigues et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement | Nature Communications." https://www.nature.com/ articles/s41467-021-22294-x (accessed Jun. 28, 2021).
  2. McDowall W. D 3.3 Report on first participatory co-design workshop. London: " UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources; 2018. Accessed: Jun. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://innopaths.eu/2019/04/11/d-3-3-report-on-first- participatory-co-design-workshop/.
  3. McDowall W. D3.5 Report on second participatory co-design workshop. London: " UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources; 2019. Accessed: Jun. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://innopaths.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ D3.5.pdf.
  4. Rodriguez BS, Drummond P, Ekins P. "Decarbonizing the EU energy system by 2050: an important role for BECCS," Clim. Policy Jun. 2017;17. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14693062.2016.1242058. sup1, pp. S93eS110. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, R., Pietzcker, R., Fragkos, P., Price, J., McDowall, W., Siskos, P., Fotiou, T., Luderer, G., & Capros, P.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Rodrigues, Renato
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
239
Pages
121908
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197085034
Cited by
90
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission (730403)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
carbon neutrality, deep decarbonization, EU climate policy, energy scenarios, carbon dioxide removal, hydrogen, synthetic fuels, electrification, renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, carbon pricing, hard-to-abate sectors, stakeholder narratives, REMIND, prime numbers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review