Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ion-induced field screening as a dominant factor in perovskite solar cell operational stability

Open access
Thiesbrummel, Jarla, Shah, Sahil, Gutierrez-Partida, Emilio, Zu, Fengshuo, Peña-Camargo, Francisco, Zeiske, Stefan, Diekmann, Jonas, Ye, Fangyuan, Peters, Karol P., Brinkmann, Kai O., Caprioglio, Pietro, Dasgupta, Akash, Seo, Seongrok, Adeleye, Fatai A., Warby, Jonathan, Jeangros, Quentin, Lang, Felix, Zhang, Shuo, Albrecht, Steve, Riedl, Thomas, Armin, Ardalan, Neher, Dieter, Koch, Norbert, Wu, Yongzhen, Le Corre, Vincent M., Snaith, Henry, Stolterfoht, Martin·2024·Nature Energy

Abstract

The presence of mobile ions in metal halide perovskites has been shown to adversely affect the intrinsic stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, the actual contribution of mobile ions to the total degradation loss compared with other factors such as trap-assisted recombination remains poorly understood. Here we reveal that mobile ion-induced internal field screening is the dominant factor in the degradation of PSCs under operational conditions. The increased field screening leads to a decrease in the steady-state efficiency, often owing to a large reduction in the current density. Instead, the efficiency at high scan speeds (>1,000 V s −1 ), where the ions are immobilized, is much less affected. We also show that the bulk and interface quality do not degrade upon ageing, yet the open-circuit voltage decreases owing to an increase in the mobile ion density. This work reveals the importance of ionic losses for intrinsic PSC degradation before chemical or extrinsic mechanical effects manifest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Metadata

Authors
Thiesbrummel, J., Shah, S., Gutierrez-Partida, E., Zu, F., Peña-Camargo, F., Zeiske, S., Diekmann, J., Ye, F., Peters, K. P., Brinkmann, K. O., Caprioglio, P., Dasgupta, A., Seo, S., Adeleye, F. A., Warby, J., Jeangros, Q., Lang, F., Zhang, S., Albrecht, S., Riedl, T., Armin, A., Neher, D., Koch, N., Wu, Y., Le Corre, V. M., Snaith, H., & Stolterfoht, M.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2024-03-28
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
664-676
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393261943
Cited by
267
References
69
FWCI
27.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ion-induced field screening as a dominant factor in perovskite solar cell operational stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w
The paper
Thiesbrummel, J., Shah, S., Gutierrez-Partida, E., Zu, F., Peña-Camargo, F., Zeiske, S., Diekmann, J., Ye, F., Peters, K. P., Brinkmann, K. O., Caprioglio, P., Dasgupta, A., Seo, S., Adeleye, F. A., Warby, J., Jeangros, Q., Lang, F., Zhang, S., Albrecht, S., . . . Stolterfoht, M. (2024). Ion-induced field screening as a dominant factor in perovskite solar cell operational stability. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.