The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental labour
Abstract
Mental effort is an elementary notion in our folk psychology and a familiar fixture in everyday introspective experience. However, as an object of scientific study, mental effort has remained rather elusive. Cognitive psychology has provided some tools for understanding how effort impacts performance, by linking effort with cognitive control function. What has remained less clear are the principles that govern the allocation of mental effort. Under what circumstances do people choose to invest mental effort, and when do they decline to do so? And what regulates the intensity of mental effort when it is applied? In new and promising work, these questions are being approached with the tools of behavioural economics. Though still in its infancy, this economic approach to mental effort research has already uncovered important aspects of effort-based decision-making, and points clearly to future lines of inquiry, including some intriguing opportunities presented by recent artificial intelligence research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our friend Prudence makes us do more work, which people prefer to avoid [19], so we may find that participants prefer less work, but with worse results Buçinca et al. [1].”
From Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI!: Hypothesis-driven Decision Support using Evaluative AI (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322655392 · Cited by 5,377
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,453
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1560 · Cited by 2,533
The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function
Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007 · Cited by 2,321
Self-citationThe Adaptive Character of Thought
Massaro, D. W., Friedman, D., & Anderson, J. R. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423253 · Cited by 2,174
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Hull, C. L. Principles of Behavior (Appleton-Century, New York, NY, 1943).
- Allport, G. W. The Nature of Prejudice (Addison Wesley, New York, NY, 1954).
- Baroody, A. J. & Ginsburg, H. P. in Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (ed. Hiebert, J.) 75–112 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1986).
- Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. 14, 534–552 (1988).
- Apps, M. A., Grima, L. L., Manohar, S. & Husain, M. The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making. Sci. Rep. 5, 16880 (2015).
- Posner, M. I. & DiGirolamo, G. J. in The Attentive Brain (ed. Parasuraman, R.) 401–423 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
- Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973).
- Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. in Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (ed. Solso, R. L.) 55–85 (Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1975).
- Musslick, S., Cohen, J. D. & Shenhav, A. Estimating the costs of cognitive control: theoretical validation and potential pitfalls. In Proc. 40th Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society (2017).
- Nicholson, W. & Snyder, C. M. Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extension (Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, 2008).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–291 of 291
Geddert, R., Madlon‐Kay, S., O’Neill, K. J., Pearson, J., & Egner, T. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02712-7 · Cited by 4
“Most obviously, implementing cognitive stability and flexibility is effort-ful (Shenhav et al., 2013, 2017), avoided when possible (Botvinick et al., 2015; Kool & Botvinick, 2014, 2018; Westbrook & Braver, 2015) and likely only engaged on an as-needed basis (Bugg, 2014).”
Do People Think Fast or Slow When Training AI?
Treiman, L. S., Ho, C.-J., & Kool, W. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732177 · Cited by 1
“However, when the effort cost of planning becomes too high, people shy away from deliberate lines of actions [57, 61, 88].”
InfluentialSelf-citationEffort Expenditure Reduces Prosocial Decision‐Making: Computational Principles and Neural Mechanisms
Zhang, Y., Dong, J., Chen, N., & Wei, P. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70290 · Cited by 3
“In contrast, real-world donations involve giving away income earned through physical or cognitive effort, which is often perceived as costly and aversive (Kool and Botvinick 2018; Kurzban 2016; but see Inzlicht et al. 2018).”
Hypocritical blame is associated with reduced prosocial motivation
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Yu, H.-B., Prosser, A., Lockwood, P., Crockett, M. J., & Apps, M. A. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17698-4 · Cited by 1
Economics of avoidance: Threshold-activated decision-making
Lehner, S. (2025) · Global Economics Research · doi:10.1016/j.ecores.2025.100013 · Cited by 1
Influence of mental effort on sound evaluations in virtual and real experimental environments
Himmelein, H., von Berg, M., Pörschmann, C., & Steffens, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2025.1672595 · Cited by 1
Yang, C., Liu, T., Wen, M., & Liu, X. (2025) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-025-00363-w · Cited by 1
“’ s fi ndings,whichsuggestthat task planning complexity can in fl uence the task-speci fi c cost of mental effort 45 , thereby biasing strategy selection and impairing learning performance 15,46 – 52 .”
Neural dynamics of cognitive control: Current tensions and future promise
Zhou, D., Cosme, D., Kang, Y., Stanoi, O. A., Lydon‐Staley, D. M., Mucha, P. J., Falk, E. B., Ochsner, K. N., & Bassett, D. S. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106909 · Cited by 2
Model-based planning in structured foraging environments
Zalabak, T. R., Bustamante, L. A., & Kool, W. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106367 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMapping affective pathways to compulsion: Insights from an aversive devaluation approach
Sallie, S. N., Casero, V., Sonkusare, S., & Voon, V. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00089 · Cited by 1
“The ADT models avoidance under controlled conditions but may not capture features of real-world threats, such as emotional salience (Phelps & LeDoux, 2005), unpredictability (Grupe & Nitschke, 2013), or cognitive load (Kool & Botvinick, 2018).”
Tobacco deprivation impairs metacognitive accuracy and cognitive flexibility
Soutschek, A., Engelmann, T., Mattes, R., & Wittekind, C. E. (2025) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-025-06984-8 · Cited by 1
Deciding for others diminishes model-based decision-making but depends on individual prosociality
Huang, Y., Du, X., & Zhen, S. (2026) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-025-00397-0 · Cited by 1
Computational underpinnings of cognitive effortful performance in short timescales
Emanuel, A. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01407-3 · Cited by 1
Integrating arousal and valence approaches to advance cognitive effort research
Adeli-Koudehi, A., Teschl, M., Luchini, S., & Grosbras, M. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01409-1 · Cited by 1
Demand avoidance in value-based choice under risk: A behavioral and pupillometric examination
Castanheira, K. D. S., & Otto, A. R. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-025-01392-z · Cited by 1
“At the same time, a growing body of work investigating the phenomenology of mental effort observes, nearly ubiquitously, that individuals, when faced with the choice, avoid cognitively demanding courses of action (Kool & Botvinick, 2018; Vogel et al., 2020).”
InfluentialWhy we value things more as we are about to lose them: A reference-based theory
Pezzulo, G., Nuzzi, D., & Rigoli, F. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106613 · Cited by 1
Empathy motivation is preserved following amygdala damage
Scheffer, J. A., Reber, J., Cameron, C. D., Feinstein, J. S., & Tranel, D. (2026) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awag074 · Cited by 2
“Binary selection tasks are used extensively to study motivation and individual variation in mental effort avoidance, 24-26 including in clinical samples (e.g. schizophrenia).”
Understanding mechanisms of voluntary engagement of mental effort using active inference
Maramotti, R., Parr, T., Tondelli, M., Ballotta, D., Manohar, S., Zamboni, G., & Pagnoni, G. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01419-z · Cited by 2
Erfanian, M., Meunier, L., & Gajewski, J. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70081 · Cited by 1
Extreme Cognitive Assistance and Open Futures
Sharadin, N. (2026) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v31i4.6237 · Cited by 1
Augmentation or Erosion? Regulating Cognitive Offloading in Generative AI-Supported STEM Learning
Nakamura, D. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10224-6 · Cited by 3
“…is a cost that learners weigh against the value of what it buys, as expectancy– value accounts of motivation have long held (Inzlicht et al., 2018; Kool & Botvinick, 2018; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000 ); the decision to offload is itself modeled as a value-based trade-off between the costs of…”
InfluentialIs It Worth It? How Your Brain Decides to Make an Effort
Kramer, A., Huizenga, H. M., A, L. K. M., & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K. (2020) · Frontiers for Young Minds · doi:10.3389/frym.2020.00073 · Cited by 1
The Role of Subjective Expectations for Exhaustion and Recovery: The Sample Case of Work and Leisure
Schüttengruber, V., & Freund, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221134529 · Cited by 1
Reward masks the learning of cognitive control demand
Bustos, B., Jiang, J., & Kool, W. (2025) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-025-10307-0 · Cited by 1
Self-citationQuantifying the Cost of Context Sensitivity in Decision‐Making
Liu, S., Gershman, S. J., & Bari, B. A. (2025) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.70030 · Cited by 1
Mouraux, C., Egroo, M. V., Chylinski, D., Narbutas, J., Phillips, C. L. M., Salmon, É., Maquet, P., Bastin, C., Collette, F., & Vandewalle, G. (2022) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000868 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Processing dissociation by mental effort manipulation in long demanding tasksPreprint
Alves, M. V., Tassini, S. C. V., Aedo-Jury, F., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.25.060814 · Cited by 1
Outrage Fatigue? Cognitive Costs and Decisions to BlamePreprint
Bambrah, V., Cameron, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6y4ad · Cited by 1
People Accurately Predict the Shape of Skill Learning CurvesPreprint
Zhang, X., McDougle, S. D., & Leonard, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rwuc9 · Cited by 1
Toro‐Serey, C., Kane, G. A., & McGuire, J. T. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5ygwh
Analytic Engagement and the Perils of Reframing the Dual- and Single-Process Models Debate
Neys, W. D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211039848
Physics of Experiential Now: Effort of Atomic Action
Lubashevsky, I., & Plavinska, N. (2021) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82612-3_5
Radtke, V. C., Wolff, W., & Martarelli, C. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rjkpc · Cited by 3
Zuo, Z., Yang, L., & Li, H. (2023) · JUSTC · doi:10.52396/justc-2023-0132
Counting the Cost: An Examination of the Motivation to Manage DistractionPreprint
Anderson, B. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4732129
Money versus performance feedback: money associated with lower feelings of cognitive fatigue
Erani, F. R., Stoll, H., Patel, D., Schultheis, M. T., & Medaglia, J. D. (2024) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2024.2424533 · Cited by 1
“Research has demonstrated that tasks with increased demands (e.g., switching) are associated with or required greater effort (Kool & Botvinick, 2018; Kool et al., 2017; Monsell, 2003), and thus we expected that high-demand conditions would require more effort.”
More time and effort, same curiosity: Information accessibility does not impact curiosityPreprint
Liquin, E. G. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bceq7_v1
Lee, H., Lim, J., & Lee, S. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112844 · Cited by 1
“Making a decision is a deliberate process that requires significant mental effort 88,89 and involves a hierarchy of brain regions, 87,90–93 which uses up substantial neural computation and communication resources.”
Reward Choices: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Task Performance
Dewaele, L., Cardinaels, E., & den Abbeele, A. G. H. L. V. (2025) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2025.2504438
“Turning to the cost–benefit analysis of exerting cognitive effort (Kool & Botvinick, 2018), we reason that individuals will exert cognitive effort according to its subjective costs and the subjective value of the benefit of doing so.”
Preferences for risk conversations in everyday life: a conjoint analysis
Perlstein, S., Kantorowicz, J., & Kuipers, S. (2025) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2025.2526479
“However, people will generally avoid effort, at least when the reward is low, often referred to as “the law of least mental effort” (Kool et al. 2010; Inzlicht, Shenhav, and Olivola 2018; Kool and Botvinick 2018).”
Spronkers, F. S., Koolschijn, R. S., Daw, N. D., Otto, A. R., & den Ouden, H. E. M. (2026) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109452
Kognitive und neuronale Grundlagen von Motivation, Belohnung und Selbstkontrolle
Goschke, T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69368-1_10
Demand Avoidance in Value-Based Choice Under Risk: A Behavioral and Pupillometric ExaminationPreprint
Castanheira, K. D. S., & Otto, A. R. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yagn5_v2
Physical effort and task errors influence the choice for cognitive offloading
Aust, R., Weis, P. P., & Kunde, W. (2025) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-025-02186-1 · Cited by 1
More time and effort, same curiosity: Expected effort does not impact curiosityPreprint
Liquin, E. G. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bceq7_v3
The Average Reward Rate Modulates Behavioral and Neural Indices of Effortful Control AllocationPreprint
Otto, A. R., Lin, H., Inzlicht, M., & Ristic, J. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-Control and Decision-Making
Raio, C. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02925-6_18
The Neuroeconomics of Social Influence and Contagion
Su, Z., & Lockwood, P. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02925-6_26
Scholey, E. V., Lugtmeijer, S., & Apps, M. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02925-6_17
Mental cost of simple(st) physical exertion
Xie, W., Choo, Y., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106481
Brozzo, C., & Shepherd, J. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05481-5
Hopkins, V. C., & Kormos, C. (2026) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2026.102106 · Cited by 2
Exerting effort for non-instrumental information under risk
Fan, H., Dong, B., Benkelman, D. G., Rodman, A. M., Dorfman, H. M., Glimcher, P. W., & Phelps, E. A. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43803-2
Βases cérébrales du compromis coûts/bénéfices
Clairis, N. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5e0e9c10z2c72z4ed2zb4caz900659cedbc0
Implication of the locus coeruleus in effort processing : electrophysiological studies
Bornert, P. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/665d6bd7ze2f5z41c9z93f8z764be3c6d822
Exploring of the the neural mechanisms of fatigue by passive induction
Ioannucci, S. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/dae7d651z6aefz4170z8365z14422797e54f
Dixon, M. L., Blevins, E., Dweck, C. S., Görgen, K., & Knutson, B. D. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2601231123
“Value - based frameworks including the EVC framework (1, 2, 8–14) have recently offered a compelling account of how motivational processes can guide decisions about initiating cognitive effort.”
Determinants of persistence in sequential effort-based decision-makingPreprint
Chaigneau, A., Moretti, R., Iodice, P., Pessiglione, M., & Pezzulo, G. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.11.723817
Tan, J., Zhou, S., & Yang, Q. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9682135/v1
Freezing Under Fire: Status-Quo Bias, Effortful Coping, and Well-Being During a Prolonged War
Barokas, G., Ling, H. H., Sherman, A., & Shavit, T. (2026) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-026-10614-6
“Rather than the mere possession of resources, it is the investments people make in different life domains that support their well-being (Inzlicht et al., 2018; Kool & Botvinick, 2018; Lyubomirsky et al., 2011; Sheldon et al., 2010).”
Grinschgl, S., Ninaus, M., Wood, G. M. D. O., & Neubauer, A. C. (2026) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2026.06.006
Gao, Y.-Y., Zhang, J., Xu, S., Zheng, W., Pan, Y., & Li, X. (2026) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122123
Neurobiology of Flow and Optimal Performance
Kee, R., & Huskey, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21528-4_3
What is working memory for? An ethological approach to working memory in children and adults
Koolhaas, C., Blaser, E., & Káldy, Z. (2026) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2026.07.001
Correspondence between daily decision-making and preferences for leisure activities
Konishi, N., Takeda, Y., Akamatsu, M., Kimura, M., Sugimoto, F., & Toyoda, H. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.114059
Neural signatures of harm aversion predict later willingness to exert effort for others' rewards
Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Yu, H., Prosser, A. M. B., Lockwood, P. L., Rojas‐Thomas, F., Crockett, M. J., & Apps, M. A. J. (2026) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.08.018
Changing the motivation for mental work with temporal interference stimulation
Vural, G., Drexler, S., Keeser, D., & Soutschek, A. (2026) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04449-w
Executive functions as a transdiagnostic endophenotype in developmental psychopathology
Braithwaite, E., Fielder, J. C., & Steinbeis, N. (2026) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-026-03916-6
Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training
Gile, D. (2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173
Working languages in interpreting
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c8
Communication and quality in interpreting and translation
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c2
Theory in interpreter and translator training
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c1
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.glossary
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.toc
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.refs
Ad hoc Knowledge Acquisition in interpreting and translation
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c6
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.prelim
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c7
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.ci
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.int
Techniques, strategies and tactics
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c9
Integrating more theory into training
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c10
Preface to the second revised edition
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.pre
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c3
A Sequential Model of translation
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c5
Understanding specialized discourse in interpreting and translation
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.c4
(2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.ni
Gile, D. (2026) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.173.lof
Beyond Cortical Signatures: Measurement Gaps Across Theories of Consciousness
Svet, M., & Arachchige, A. S. P. M. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16101087
“In computational neuroscience, meta-control means arbitration between controllers and tuning of their parameters: model-based versus model-free learning by reliability [191], deciding how to decide [192], allocating effort by expected benefit [193], reviewed in [194].”
Demand-Sensitive Time Allocation in Digital Reading: Evidence from 25 Education Systems
Li, Y., Zhang, J., & Rhee, G. S. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14100264
“Cognitive control is regulated by both demand and cost–benefit considerations (Shenhav et al., 2017; Kool & Botvinick, 2018).”
Effort-based decision-making: A value-guided dissection and arousal-focused synthesis
Clairis, N., & Tobler, P. N. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.107062
Metadata
- Authors
- Kool, W., & Botvinick, M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Botvinick, Matthew
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2018-09-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 899-908
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249127163
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- cognitive effort, effort allocation, effort-based decision making, behavioral economics, cognitive control, cost-benefit trade-off, effort intensity, artificial intelligence
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Reward, Work, Economics, Behavioral
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
