The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries
Open accessAbstract
The principles underlying functional asymmetries in cortex remain debated. For example, it is accepted that speech is processed bilaterally in auditory cortex, but a left hemisphere dominance emerges when the input is interpreted linguistically. The mechanisms, however, are contested, such as what sound features or processing principles underlie laterality. Recent findings across species (humans, canines and bats) provide converging evidence that spectrotemporal sound features drive asymmetrical responses. Typically, accounts invoke models wherein the hemispheres differ in time–frequency resolution or integration window size. We develop a framework that builds on and unifies prevailing models, using spectrotemporal modulation space. Using signal processing techniques motivated by neural responses, we test this approach, employing behavioural and neurophysiological measures. We show how psychophysical judgements align with spectrotemporal modulations and then characterize the neural sensitivities to temporal and spectral modulations. We demonstrate differential contributions from both hemispheres, with a left lateralization for temporal modulations and a weaker right lateralization for spectral modulations. We argue that representations in the modulation domain provide a more mechanistic basis to account for lateralization in auditory cortex. Flinker and colleagues describe a framework for auditory cortical asymmetries that capitalizes on spectrotemporal modulation space. Data from psychophysics, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) inform a signal processing-based view on lateralization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm
Ashburner, J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007 · Cited by 8,122
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Self-citationCategorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Poeppel, D. (2003) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00107-3 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationSpeech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain
Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752 · Cited by 643
Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech
Flinker, A., Korzeniewska, A., Shestyuk, A. Y., Franaszczuk, P. J., Dronkers, N. F., Knight, R. T., & Crone, N. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414491112 · Cited by 487
Self-citationLateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing
Belin, P., Zilbovicius, M., Crozier, S., Thivard, L., Fontaine, A. A., Masure, M.-C., & Samson, Y. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562834 · Cited by 324
Distributed neural representations of phonological features during speech perception
Arsenault, J. S., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2454-14.2015 · Cited by 111
Orienting Asymmetries in Dogs’ Responses to Different Communicatory Components of Human Speech
Ratcliffe, V. F., & Reby, D. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.030 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective
Güntürkün, O., Ströckens, F., & Ocklenburg, S. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2019 · Cited by 484
Distinct sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulation supports brain asymmetry for speech and melody
Albouy, P., Benjamin, L., Morillon, B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3468 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Flinker, A., Doyle, W. K., Mehta, A. D., Devinsky, O., & Poeppel, D.
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-405
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2919549344
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 15.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41562-019-0548-z
- The paper
- Flinker, A., Doyle, W. K., Mehta, A. D., Devinsky, O., & Poeppel, D. (2019). Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0548-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.