Cited by 61Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Orienting Asymmetries in Dogs’ Responses to Different Communicatory Components of Human Speech

Open access
Ratcliffe, Victoria F., Reby, David·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

It is well established that in human speech perception the left hemisphere (LH) of the brain is specialized for processing intelligible phonemic (segmental) content (e.g., [1-3]), whereas the right hemisphere (RH) is more sensitive to prosodic (suprasegmental) cues. Despite evidence that a range of mammal species show LH specialization when processing conspecific vocalizations, the presence of hemispheric biases in domesticated animals' responses to the communicative components of human speech has never been investigated. Human speech is familiar and relevant to domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), who are known to perceive both segmental phonemic cues and suprasegmental speaker-related and emotional prosodic cues. Using the head-orienting paradigm, we presented dogs with manipulated speech and tones differing in segmental or suprasegmental content and recorded their orienting responses. We found that dogs showed a significant LH bias when presented with a familiar spoken command in which the salience of meaningful phonemic (segmental) cues was artificially increased but a significant RH bias in response to commands in which the salience of intonational or speaker-related (suprasegmental) vocal cues was increased. Our results provide insights into mechanisms of interspecific vocal perception in a domesticated mammal and suggest that dogs may share ancestral or convergent hemispheric specializations for processing the different functional communicative components of speech with human listeners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.030

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dogs process semantic information and emotional cues in speech in different parts of the brain, just like humans.

    “Dogs process semantic information and emotional cues in speech in different parts of the brain, just like humans (Ratcliffe and Reby 2014).”

    From The Dog-Eared Dictionary: Human-Animal Alliance in Chinese Civilization (2015) · cites this paper as Ratcliffe and Reby 2014

    The Results and Discussion report a left-hemisphere bias for phonemic cues with learned meaning and a right-hemisphere bias for emotional prosody. The Conclusions describe these biases as broadly comparable to humans, but say further research is needed to identify the specific brain regions involved. Thus the claim overstates the evidence by asserting processing in different brain parts as an established finding. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratcliffe, V. F., & Reby, D.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Reby, David
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
24
Pages
2908-2912
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074817220
Cited by
61
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
dogs, hemispheric lateralization, human speech perception, prosodic features, prosody, domestication, convergent evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Communication, Cues, Dogs, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review