Cited by 346COVID-19 epidemiological studiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Open access
Jay, Jonathan, Bor, Jacob, Nsoesie, Elaine O., Lipson, Sarah K., Jones, David K., Galea, Sandro, Raifman, Julia·2020·Nature Human Behaviour

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Physical distancing has been the primary strategy to control COVID-19 in the United States. We used mobility data from a large, anonymized sample of smartphone users to assess the relationship between neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the pandemic. We found a strong gradient between neighbourhood income and physical distancing. Individuals in high-income neighbourhoods increased their days at home substantially more than individuals in low-income neighbourhoods did. Residents of low-income neighbourhoods were more likely to work outside the home, compared to residents in higher-income neighbourhoods, but were not more likely to visit locations such as supermarkets, parks and hospitals. Finally, we found that state orders were only associated with small increases in staying home in low-income neighbourhoods. Our findings indicate that people in lower-income neighbourhoods have faced barriers to physical distancing, particularly needing to work outside the home, and that state physical distancing policies have not mitigated these disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-020-00998-2

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jay, J., Bor, J., Nsoesie, E. O., Lipson, S. K., Jones, D. K., Galea, S., & Raifman, J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Jay, Jonathan
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2020-11-03
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
1294-1302
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096036142
Cited by
346
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 12
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (77922)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001430)
  • Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston University (1UL1TR001430)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH121515)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
social distancing, COVID-19 pandemic, neighborhood income, socioeconomic disparities, smartphone mobility data, staying at home, work location, low-income neighbourhoods, United States
MeSH terms
Teleworking, Physical Distancing, COVID-19, Adult, Employment, Humans, Income, Public Policy, Residence Characteristics, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review