Cited by 46Stress Responses and CortisolMental Health Research TopicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Context matters for affective chronometry.

Lapate, Regina C., Heller, Aaron S.·2020·Nature Human Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-020-0860-7

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapate, R. C., & Heller, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lapate, Regina C.
  • Heller, Aaron S.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
688-689
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018442593
Cited by
46
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (F32-MH113347)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
affect dynamics, psychological well-being, resilience, allostasis, cortisol, depression, social anxiety, meaning of life, conscientiousness, positive and negative emotions
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review