Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 541

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes

Open access
Schwietert, Tammo K., Arszelewska, Violetta A., Wang, Chao, Yu, Chuang, Vasileiadis, Alexandros, de Klerk, Niek J. J., Hageman, Jart, Hupfer, Thomas, Kerkamm, Ingo, Xu, Yaolin, van der Maas, Eveline, Kelder, Erik M., Ganapathy, Swapna, Wagemaker, Marnix·2020·Nature Materials

Abstract

All-solid-state Li-ion batteries promise safer electrochemical energy storage with larger volumetric and gravimetric energy densities. A major concern is the limited electrochemical stability of solid electrolytes and related detrimental electrochemical reactions, especially because of our restricted understanding. Here we demonstrate for the argyrodite-, garnet- and NASICON-type solid electrolytes that the favourable decomposition pathway is indirect rather than direct, via (de)lithiated states of the solid electrolyte, into the thermodynamically stable decomposition products. The consequence is that the electrochemical stability window of the solid electrolyte is notably larger than predicted for direct decomposition, rationalizing the observed stability window. The observed argyrodite metastable (de)lithiated solid electrolyte phases contribute to the (ir)reversible cycling capacity of all-solid-state batteries, in addition to the contribution of the decomposition products, comprehensively explaining solid electrolyte redox activity. The fundamental nature of the proposed mechanism suggests this is a key aspect for solid electrolytes in general, guiding interface and material design for all-solid-state batteries. Although all-solid-state Li-ion batteries exhibit enhanced energy densities, electrochemical stability of solid electrolytes remains a challenge. A mechanism explaining the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability for typical solid electrolytes is now proposed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-019-0576-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 541

Metadata

Authors
Schwietert, T. K., Arszelewska, V. A., Wang, C., Yu, C., Vasileiadis, A., de Klerk, N. J. J., Hageman, J., Hupfer, T., Kerkamm, I., Xu, Y., van der Maas, E., Kelder, E. M., Ganapathy, S., & Wagemaker, M.
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2020-01-13
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
428-435
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W2970796811
Cited by
541
References
4
FWCI
21.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-019-0576-0
The paper
Schwietert, T. K., Arszelewska, V. A., Wang, C., Yu, C., Vasileiadis, A., de Klerk, N. J. J., Hageman, J., Hupfer, T., Kerkamm, I., Xu, Y., van der Maas, E., Kelder, E. M., Ganapathy, S., & Wagemaker, M. (2020). Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0576-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.