Cited by 210Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ

Microtubules tune mechanosensitive cell responses

Open access
Seetharaman, Shailaja, Vianay, Benoit, Roca, Vanessa, Farrugia, Aaron J., De Pascalis, Chiara, Boëda, Batiste, Dingli, Florent, Loew, Damarys +4 more·2022·Nature Materials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mechanotransduction is a process by which cells sense the mechanical properties of their surrounding environment and adapt accordingly to perform cellular functions such as adhesion, migration and differentiation. Integrin-mediated focal adhesions are major sites of mechanotransduction and their connection with the actomyosin network is crucial for mechanosensing as well as for the generation and transmission of forces onto the substrate. Despite having emerged as major regulators of cell adhesion and migration, the contribution of microtubules to mechanotransduction still remains elusive. Here, we show that talin- and actomyosin-dependent mechanosensing of substrate rigidity controls microtubule acetylation (a tubulin post-translational modification) by promoting the recruitment of α-tubulin acetyltransferase 1 (αTAT1) to focal adhesions. Microtubule acetylation tunes the mechanosensitivity of focal adhesions and Yes-associated protein (YAP) translocation. Microtubule acetylation, in turn, promotes the release of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 from microtubules to activate RhoA, actomyosin contractility and traction forces. Our results reveal a fundamental crosstalk between microtubules and actin in mechanotransduction that contributes to mechanosensitive cell adhesion and migration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-021-01108-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GFP-GEF-H1 bound along most microtubules in U2OS cells.

    “GFP-GEF-H1 bound along most microtubules in U2OS cells”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The paper reports that GEF-H1 associates with microtubules in astrocytes: approximately 42% was microtubule-localized in controls and 60% after αTAT1 depletion (passage labeled Abstract; Fig. 4E–F). It does not establish that GFP-GEF-H1 bound along most microtubules in U2OS cells; the reported percentages describe GEF-H1 localization, not the proportion of microtubules bound. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GFP-GEF-H1 was barely detected on acetylated microtubules in U2OS cells.

    “but was barely detected on acetylated microtubules (Fig. 3a, yellow dashed line, and Fig. 3c)”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says microtubule acetylation promotes GEF-H1 release from microtubules, supporting the direction of the claim. It reports GEF-H1 localization in astrocytes, however, not barely detectable GFP-GEF-H1 on acetylated microtubules in U2OS cells; searches for those specific terms found no such result. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Local stabilization and expansion of microtubules near focal adhesions can potentially trigger GEF-H1 release and RhoA-dependent focal adhesion disassembly during cell movement.

    “Furthermore, local stabilization and expansion of microtubules in the vicinity of focal adhesions 32,74 can potentially trigger GEF-H1 release and RhoA-dependent focal adhesion disassembly during cell movement.”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The paper reports that growing microtubule ends occur near focal adhesions in migrating cells, and that microtubule acetylation promotes GEF-H1 release and RhoA activation (sections labelled Abstract; pages unavailable). It also reports altered focal-adhesion dynamics, but does not establish that local microtubule stabilization and expansion trigger RhoA-dependent focal-adhesion disassembly. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both pharmacological and genetic HDAC6 loss increase actomyosin contractility, consistent with a lagged, acetylation‐dependent effect on the actomyosin cytoskeleton.

    “Together, these data indicate that both pharmacological and genetic HDAC6 loss increase actomyosin contractility, consistent with a lagged, acetylation‐dependent effect on the actomyosin cytoskeleton [21].”

    From Paclitaxel induces <scp>NM2</scp> ‐dependent cellular contraction through <scp>GEF</scp> ‐ <scp>H1</scp> dissociation from microtubules and <scp>RhoA</scp> / <scp>ROCK</scp> activation in cancer cells (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The traction-force passage (labelled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) reports that Tubacin, an HDAC6 inhibitor, increased traction forces in astrocytes. The Additional information identifies the genetic knockdown as targeting αTAT1, not HDAC6. The cited paper supports an acetylation-dependent link to actomyosin contractility, but does not establish genetic HDAC6 loss or a lagged effect. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The kinetics of GEF-H1 dissociation from microtubules induced by PTXL were much faster than those induced by inhibitors of HDAC6.

    “Importantly, the kinetics of GEF‐H1 dissociation from microtubules induced by PTXL were much faster than those induced by inhibitors of HDAC6 [21]”

    From Paclitaxel induces <scp>NM2</scp> ‐dependent cellular contraction through <scp>GEF</scp> ‐ <scp>H1</scp> dissociation from microtubules and <scp>RhoA</scp> / <scp>ROCK</scp> activation in cancer cells (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The passage indexed under “Abstract” (page unavailable) reports that Tubacin treatment released GEF-H1 from microtubules into the cytosol. The Cell treatment section (page unavailable) identifies Tubacin as a treatment, but our copy does not report PTXL-induced release or compare the kinetics of PTXL and HDAC6 inhibitors (searched: PTXL, paclitaxel, and GEF-H1 dissociation kinetics). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 210

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Sun, Z., Guo, S. S. & Fässler, R. Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. The Journal of cell biology 215, 445-456, doi:10.1083/jcb.201609037 (2016). · DOI
  2. Ladoux, B., Mège, R.-M. & Trepat, X. Front-Rear Polarization by Mechanical Cues: From Single Cells to Tissues. Trends in Cell Biology 26, 420-433, doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.02.002 (2016). · DOI
  3. Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubules in cell migration. Annual review of cell and developmental biology 29, 471-499, doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155711 (2013). · DOI
  4. Bouchet, B. P. & Akhmanova, A. Microtubules in 3D cell motility. Journal of cell science 130, 39- 50, doi:10.1242/jcs.189431 (2017). · DOI
  5. Seetharaman, S. & Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubules at focal adhesions -a double-edged sword. Journal of cell science 132, jcs232843, doi:10.1242/jcs.232843 (2019). · DOI
  6. Bance, B., Seetharaman, S., Leduc, C., Boëda, B. & Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubule acetylation but not detyrosination promotes focal adhesion dynamics and astrocyte migration. Journal of cell science 132, jcs.225805, doi:10.1242/jcs.225805 (2019). · DOI
  7. Coombes, C. et al. Mechanism of microtubule lumen entry for the α-tubulin acetyltransferase enzyme αTAT1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, E7176-E7184, doi:10.1073/pnas.1605397113 (2016). · DOI
  8. Haggarty, S. J., Koeller, K. M., Wong, J. C., Butcher, R. A. & Schreiber, S. L. Multidimensional Chemical Genetic Analysis of Diversity-Oriented Synthesis-Derived Deacetylase Inhibitors Using Cell-Based Assays. Chemistry & Biology 10, 383-396, doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00095-4 (2003). · DOI
  9. Haggarty, S. J., Koeller, K. M., Wong, J. C., Grozinger, C. M. & Schreiber, S. L. Domain-selective small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 4389-4394, doi:10.1073/pnas.0430973100 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Choquet, D., Felsenfeld, D. P. & Sheetz, M. P. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 88, 39-48, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81856-5 (1997). · DOI
  11. Wolfenson, H. et al. Tropomyosin controls sarcomere-like contractions for rigidity sensing and suppressing growth on soft matrices. Nature cell biology 18, 33-42, doi:10.1038/ncb3277 (2016). · DOI
  12. Peglion, F., Llense, F. & Etienne-Manneville, S. Adherens junction treadmilling during collective migration. Nature cell biology 16, 639 (2014).
  13. Bershadsky, A., Chausovsky, A., Becker, E., Lyubimova, A. & Geiger, B. Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transduction. Current Biology 6, 1279- 1289, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70714-8 (1996). · DOI
  14. Prager-Khoutorsky, M. et al. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nature cell biology 13, 1457-1465, doi:10.1038/ncb2370 (2011). · DOI
  15. Tran, A. D.-A. et al. HDAC6 deacetylation of tubulin modulates dynamics of cellular adhesions. Journal of cell science 120, 1469-1479, doi:10.1242/jcs.03431 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  16. De Pascalis, C. et al. Intermediate filaments control collective migration by restricting traction forces and sustaining cell-cell contacts. The Journal of cell biology 217, 3031-3044, doi:10.1083/jcb.201801162 (2018). · DOI
  17. Sakamoto, Y., Boeda, B. & Etienne-Manneville, S. APC binds intermediate filaments and is required for their reorganization during cell migration. The Journal of cell biology 200, 249-258, doi:10.1083/jcb.201206010 (2013). · DOI
  18. Schiller, H. B. et al. beta1-and alphav-class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin-based microenvironments. Nature cell biology 15, 625-636, doi:10.1038/ncb2747 (2013). · DOI
  19. Lawson, C. D. & Ridley, A. J. Rho GTPase signaling complexes in cell migration and invasion. 217, 447-457, doi:10.1083/jcb.201612069 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ren, Y., Li, R., Zheng, Y. & Busch, H. Cloning and characterization of GEF-H1, a microtubule- associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac and Rho GTPases. The Journal of biological chemistry 273, 34954-34960 (1998).
  21. Rafiq, N. B. M. et al. A mechano-signalling network linking microtubules, myosin IIA filaments and integrin-based adhesions. Nature Materials 18, 638-649, doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0371-y (2019). · DOI
  22. Jiu, Y. et al. Vimentin intermediate filaments control actin stress fiber assembly through GEF-H1 and RhoA. 130, 892-902, doi:10.1242/jcs.196881 (2017). · DOI
  23. Trepat, X. et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nature physics 5, 426 (2009).
  24. Fernández-Barrera, J. et al. The actin-MRTF-SRF transcriptional circuit controls tubulin acetylation via <em>α-TAT1</em> gene expression. The Journal of cell biology 217, 929-944, doi:10.1083/jcb.201702157 (2018). · DOI
  25. Thurston, S. F., Kulacz, W. A., Shaikh, S., Lee, J. M. & Copeland, J. W. The ability to induce microtubule acetylation is a general feature of formin proteins. PloS one 7, e48041, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048041 (2012). · DOI
  26. Portran, D., Schaedel, L., Xu, Z., Thery, M. & Nachury, M. V. Tubulin acetylation protects long-lived microtubules against mechanical ageing. 19, 391-398, doi:10.1038/ncb3481 (2017). · DOI
  27. Xu, Z. et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science (New York, N.Y.) 356, 328-332, doi:10.1126/science.aai8764 (2017). · DOI
  28. Barriga, E. H., Franze, K., Charras, G. & Mayor, R. Tissue stiffening coordinates morphogenesis by triggering collective cell migration in vivo. Nature 554, 523-527, doi:10.1038/nature25742 (2018). · DOI
  29. Sunyer, R. et al. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission. Science (New York, N.Y.) 353, 1157-1161, doi:10.1126/science.aaf7119 (2016). · DOI
  30. Serra-Picamal, X., Conte, V., Sunyer, R., Munoz, J. J. & Trepat, X. Mapping forces and kinematics during collective cell migration. Methods in cell biology 125, 309-330, doi:10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.11.003 (2015). · DOI
  31. Tambe, D. T. et al. Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nature materials 10, 469 (2011).
  32. Heuser, J. The production of 'cell cortices' for light and electron microscopy. Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) 1, 545-552, doi:10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010704.x (2000). · DOI
  33. Martiel, J. L. et al. Measurement of cell traction forces with ImageJ. Methods in cell biology 125, 269-287, doi:10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.10.008 (2015). · DOI
  34. Poullet, P., Carpentier, S. & Barillot, E. myProMS, a web server for management and validation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data. Proteomics 7, 2553-2556, doi:10.1002/pmic.200600784 (2007). · DOI
  35. Valot, B., Langella, O., Nano, E. & Zivy, M. MassChroQ: a versatile tool for mass spectrometry quantification. Proteomics 11, 3572-3577, doi:10.1002/pmic.201100120 (2011). · DOI
  36. Vizcaino, J. A. et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic acids research 44, D447-456, doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1145 (2016). · DOI
  37. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic acids research 47, D442-d450, doi:10.1093/nar/gky1106 (2019). · DOI

Authors
Seetharaman, S., Vianay, B., Roca, V., Farrugia, A. J., De Pascalis, C., Boëda, B., Dingli, F., Loew, D., Vassilopoulos, S., Bershadsky, A., Théry, M., & Etienne-Manneville, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
366-377
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W3205850006
Cited by
210
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Materials (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Keywords
mechanotransduction, microtubules, microtubule acetylation, focal adhesions, integrins, talin, actomyosin contractility, YAP, GEF-H1, RhoA activation, substrate stiffness, cell adhesion, cell migration, traction force
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Actin Cytoskeleton, Microtubules, Tubulin, Focal Adhesions, Mechanotransduction, Cellular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review