The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plasmid-encoded tet(X) genes that confer high-level tigecycline resistance in Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Tigecycline is one of the last-resort antibiotics to treat complicated infections caused by both multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria1. Tigecycline resistance has sporadically occurred in recent years, primarily due to chromosome-encoding mechanisms, such as overexpression of efflux pumps and ribosome protection2,3. Here, we report the emergence of the plasmid-mediated mobile tigecycline resistance mechanism Tet(X4) in Escherichia coli isolates from China, which is capable of degrading all tetracyclines, including tigecycline and the US FDA newly approved eravacycline. The tet(X4)-harbouring IncQ1 plasmid is highly transferable, and can be successfully mobilized and stabilized in recipient clinical and laboratory strains of Enterobacteriaceae bacteria. It is noteworthy that tet(X4)-positive E. coli strains, including isolates co-harbouring mcr-1, have been widely detected in pigs, chickens, soil and dust samples in China. In vivo murine models demonstrated that the presence of Tet(X4) led to tigecycline treatment failure. Consequently, the emergence of plasmid-mediated Tet(X4) challenges the clinical efficacy of the entire family of tetracycline antibiotics. Importantly, our study raises concern that the plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance may further spread into various ecological niches and into clinical high-risk pathogens. Collective efforts are in urgent need to preserve the potency of these essential antibiotics. Plasmid-encoded tet(X) genes from Escherichia coli in China confer high-level tigecycline resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.053 · Cited by 9,652
Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review
Balouiri, M., Sadiki, M., & Ibnsouda, S. K. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005 · Cited by 8,044
Cited by
Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited
Darby, E. M., Trampari, E., Siasat, P., Gaya, M. S., Alav, I., Webber, M. A., & Blair, J. M. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00820-y · Cited by 1,398
Wang, Y., Xu, C., Zhang, R., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, F., Liu, D., Lu, J., Guo, Y., Xia, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30149-3 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, J., Chen, C., Cui, C.-Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Cui, Z.-H., Ma, X.-Y., Feng, Y., Fang, L.-X., Lian, X.-L., Zhang, R.-M., Tang, Y.-Z., Zhang, K.-X., Liu, H.-M., Zhuang, Z.-H., Zhou, S.-D., Lv, J.-N., Du, H., Huang, B., Yu, F.-Y., Mathema, B., Kreiswirth, B. N., Liao, X.-P., Chen, L., & Liu, Y.-H.
- Venue
- Nature Microbiology
- Published
- 2019-06-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1457-1464
- ISSN
- 2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951279585
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasmid-encoded tet(X) genes that confer high-level tigecycline resistance in Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41564-019-0496-4
- The paper
- Sun, J., Chen, C., Cui, C.-Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Cui, Z.-H., Ma, X.-Y., Feng, Y., Fang, L.-X., Lian, X.-L., Zhang, R.-M., Tang, Y.-Z., Zhang, K.-X., Liu, H.-M., Zhuang, Z.-H., Zhou, S.-D., Lv, J.-N., Du, H., Huang, B., . . . Liu, Y.-H. (2019). Plasmid-encoded tet(X) genes that confer high-level tigecycline resistance in Escherichia coli. Nature Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0496-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.