Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scalable two-step annealing method for preparing ultra-high-density single-atom catalyst libraries

Open access
Hai, Xiao, Xi, Shibo, Mitchell, Sharon, Harrath, Karim, Xu, Haomin, Akl, Dario Faust, Kong, Debin, Li, Jing, Li, Zejun, Sun, Tao, Yang, Huimin, Cui, Yige, Su, Chenliang, Zhao, Xiaoxu, Li, Jun, Pérez-Ramírez, Javier, Lu, Jiong·2022·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

The stabilization of transition metals as isolated centres with high areal density on suitably tailored carriers is crucial for maximizing the industrial potential of single-atom heterogeneous catalysts. However, achieving single-atom dispersions at metal contents above 2 wt% remains challenging. Here we introduce a versatile approach combining impregnation and two-step annealing to synthesize ultra-high-density single-atom catalysts with metal contents up to 23 wt% for 15 metals on chemically distinct carriers. Translation to a standardized, automated protocol demonstrates the robustness of our method and provides a path to explore virtually unlimited libraries of mono- or multimetallic catalysts. At the molecular level, characterization of the synthesis mechanism through experiments and simulations shows that controlling the bonding of metal precursors with the carrier via stepwise ligand removal prevents their thermally induced aggregation into nanoparticles. The drastically enhanced reactivity with increasing metal content exemplifies the need to optimize the surface metal density for a given application. Moreover, the loading-dependent site-specific activity observed in three distinct catalytic systems reflects the well-known complexity in heterogeneous catalyst design, which now can be tackled with a library of single-atom catalysts with widely tunable metal loadings. A general versatile approach combining wet-chemistry impregnation and two-step annealing is devised for the scalable synthesis of a library of ultra-high-density single-atom catalysts with drastically enhanced reactivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-021-01022-y

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Hai, X., Xi, S., Mitchell, S., Harrath, K., Xu, H., Akl, D. F., Kong, D., Li, J., Li, Z., Sun, T., Yang, H., Cui, Y., Su, C., Zhao, X., Li, J., Pérez-Ramírez, J., & Lu, J.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2021-11-25
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
174-181
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W3154024998
Cited by
684
References
47
FWCI
30.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable two-step annealing method for preparing ultra-high-density single-atom catalyst libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41565-021-01022-y
The paper
Hai, X., Xi, S., Mitchell, S., Harrath, K., Xu, H., Akl, D. F., Kong, D., Li, J., Li, Z., Sun, T., Yang, H., Cui, Y., Su, C., Zhao, X., Li, J., Pérez-Ramírez, J., & Lu, J. (2022). Scalable two-step annealing method for preparing ultra-high-density single-atom catalyst libraries. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01022-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.