The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine-learning-assisted single-vessel analysis of nanoparticle permeability in tumour vasculatures
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The central dogma that nanoparticle delivery to tumours requires enhanced leakiness of vasculatures is a topic of debate. To address this, we propose a single-vessel quantitative analysis method by taking advantage of protein-based nanoprobes and image-segmentation-based machine learning (nano-ISML). Using nano-ISML, >67,000 individual blood vessels from 32 tumour models were quantified, revealing highly heterogenous vascular permeability of protein-based nanoparticles. There was a >13-fold difference in the percentage of high-permeability vessels in different tumours and >100-fold penetration ability in vessels with the highest permeability compared with vessels with the lowest permeability. Our data suggest passive extravasation and transendothelial transport were the dominant mechanisms for high- and low-permeability tumour vessels, respectively. To exemplify the nano-ISML-assisted rational design of nanomedicines, genetically tailored protein nanoparticles with improved transendothelial transport in low-permeability tumours were developed. Our study delineates the heterogeneity of tumour vascular permeability and defines a direction for the rational design of next-generation anticancer nanomedicines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Subsequently, data analysis of >67,000 individual blood vessels was performed by image-segmentation-based machine learning (nano-ISML) techniques to predict nanoparticle permeability in the tumor vasculatures.”
From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [343]
In the citing paper
“And based on the rational design of nano-ISML-assisted nanomedicines, genetically tailored protein nanoparticles were developed to improve transendothelial transport in low-permeability tumors and assists nanoparticles to enter solid tumors.343”
From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [343]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002
Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108 · Cited by 5,873
Machine learning for molecular and materials science
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 · Cited by 4,968
Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors
Jain, R. K., & Stylianopoulos, T. (2010) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.139 · Cited by 3,265
Drug penetration in solid tumours
Minchinton, A. I., & Tannock, I. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1893 · Cited by 2,805
A guide to machine learning for biologists
Greener, J. G., Kandathil, S. M., Moffat, L., & Jones, D. T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 · Cited by 2,127
U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry
Falk, T., Mai, D., Bensch, R., Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Marrakchi, Y., Böhm, A., Deubner, J., Jäckel, Z., Seiwald, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2 · Cited by 1,920
The entry of nanoparticles into solid tumours
Sindhwani, S., Syed, A. M., Ngai, J., Kingston, B. R., Maiorino, L., Rothschild, J., MacMillan, P., Zhang, Y., Rajesh, N. U., Hoang, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0566-2 · Cited by 1,732
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Matsumura, Y. & Maeda, H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387–6392 (1986).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy
Sun, L., Liu, H., Ye, Y., Lei, Y., Islam, R., Tan, S., Tong, R., Miao, Y.-B., & Cai, L. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01642-x · Cited by 1,073
Huang, Y., Guo, X., Wu, Y., Chen, X., Feng, L., Xie, N., & Shen, G. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01745-z · Cited by 537
Designing nanotheranostics with machine learning
Rao, L., Yuan, Y., Shen, X., Yu, G., & Chen, X. S. (2024) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01753-8 · Cited by 222
AI-enabled organoids: Construction, analysis, and application
Bai, L., Wu, Y., Li, G., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., & Su, J. (2023) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.09.005 · Cited by 218
Liu, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y.-B., Hu, D., Tang, L., Zhou, B., & Yang, L. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02112-8 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, M., Zhuang, J., Li, Z., Liu, Q., Zhao, R., Gao, Z., Midgley, A. C., Qi, T., Tian, J., Zhang, Z., Kong, D., Tian, J., Yan, X., & Huang, X.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Jingwei
- Tian, Jie
- Yan, Xiyun
- Huang, Xinglu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2023-02-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 657-666
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W4320486498
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 22
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (91959129, 31870999, 82072054)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
- Keywords
- protein nanoparticles, nanoprobes, tumor heterogeneity, transendothelial transport, tumor vasculature
- MeSH terms
- Capillary Permeability, Humans, Neoplasms, Permeability, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
