Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revealing the invariance of vectorial structured light in complex media

Nape, Isaac, Singh, Keshaan, Klug, Asher, Buono, Wagner, Rosales-Guzman, Carmelo, McWilliam, Amy, Franke-Arnold, Sonja, Kritzinger, Ané, Forbes, Patricia, Dudley, Angela, Forbes, Andrew·2022·Nature Photonics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-022-01023-w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This results in an effective magnetization of an especially designed nonlinear medium.

    “This results in an effective”

    From Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Experimental demonstration and Discussion and conclusion sections address distortion and invariance of vectorial structured light, not effective magnetization. A search for magnetization and nonlinear media found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nonseparability of vectorial light can be measured using integrated intensity measurements, making it easier and faster to detect with current technologies.

    “While the nonseparability of vectorial light can be measured using integrated intensity measurements, making it easier and faster to detect with current technologies”
  • Nonseparability of vectorial light is susceptible to noise at lower values and requires the channel to be unitary.

    “it is susceptible to noise at lower values and requires the channel to be unitary.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Forbes, A., de Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light. Nat. Photon. 15, 253–262 (2021). · DOI
  2. Shen, Y., Hou, Y., Papasimakis, N. & Zheludev, N. I. Supertoroidal light pulses as electromagnetic skyrmions propagating in free space. Nat. Commun. 12, 5891 (2021). · DOI
  3. Gao, S. et al. Paraxial skyrmionic beams. Phys. Rev. A 102, 053513 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Larocque, H. et al. Reconstructing the topology of optical polarization knots. Nat. Phys. 14, 1079–1082 (2018). · DOI
  5. Galvez, E. J., Rojec, B. L., Kumar, V. & Viswanathan, N. K. Generation of isolated asymmetric umbilics in light’s polarization. Phys. Rev. A 89, 031801 (2014). · DOI
  6. Zdagkas, A. et al. Observation of toroidal pulses of light. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03636 (2021). · DOI
  7. Keren-Zur, S., Tal, M., Fleischer, S., Mittleman, D. M. & Ellenbogen, T. Generation of spatiotemporally tailored terahertz wavepackets by nonlinear metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 10, 1778 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bauer, T. et al. Observation of optical polarization Möbius strips. Science 347, 964–966 (2015). · DOI
  9. Brown, T. G. Unconventional polarization states: beam propagation, focusing, and imaging. Prog. Opt. 56, 81–129 (2011). · DOI
  10. Wang, J., Castellucci, F. & Franke-Arnold, S. Vectorial light–matter interaction: exploring spatially structured complex light fields. AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 031702 (2020). · DOI
  11. Otte, E., Alpmann, C. & Denz, C. Polarization singularity explosions in tailored light fields. Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1700200 (2018). · DOI
  12. Rosales-Guzmán, C., Ndagano, B. & Forbes, A. A review of complex vector light fields and their applications. J. Opt. 20, 123001 (2018). · DOI
  13. Forbes, A. & Nape, I. Quantum mechanics with patterns of light: progress in high dimensional and multidimensional entanglement with structured light. AVS Quantum Sci. 1, 011701 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Sederberg, S. et al. Vectorized optoelectronic control and metrology in a semiconductor. Nat. Photon. 14, 680–685 (2020). · DOI
  15. Fang, Y. et al. Photoelectronic mapping of the spin–orbit interaction of intense light fields. Nat. Photon. 15, 115–120 (2021). · DOI
  16. El Ketara, M., Kobayashi, H. & Brasselet, E. Sensitive vectorial optomechanical footprint of light in soft condensed matter. Nat. Photon. 15, 121–124 (2021). · DOI
  17. Hawley, R. D., Cork, J., Radwell, N. & Franke-Arnold, S. Passive broadband full Stokes polarimeter using a Fresnel cone. Sci. Rep. 9, 2688 (2019). · DOI
  18. Fang, L., Wan, Z., Forbes, A. & Wang, J. Vectorial Doppler metrology. Nat. Commun. 12, 4186 (2021). · DOI
  19. Curcio, V., Alemán-Castañeda, L. A., Brown, T. G., Brasselet, S. & Alonso, M. A. Birefringent Fourier filtering for single molecule coordinate and height super-resolution imaging with dithering and orientation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5307 (2020). · DOI
  20. Milione, G. et al. 4 × 20 Gbit/s mode division multiplexing over free space using vector modes and a q-plate mode (de)multiplexer. Opt. Lett. 40, 1980–1983 (2015). · DOI
  21. Zhang, J. et al. Fiber vector eigenmode multiplexing based high capacity transmission over 5-km FMF with Kramers-Kronig receiver. J. Lightw. Technol. 39, 4932–4938 (2021). · DOI
  22. Zhu, Z. et al. Compensation-free high-dimensional free-space optical communication using turbulence-resilient vector beams. Nat. Commun. 12, 1666 (2021). · DOI
  23. Zhao, Y. & Wang, J. High-base vector beam encoding/decoding for visible-light communications. Opt. Lett. 40, 4843–4846 (2015). · DOI
  24. Radwell, N., Hawley, R., Götte, J. & Franke-Arnold, S. Achromatic vector vortex beams from a glass cone. Nat. Commun. 7, 10564 (2016). · DOI
  25. Beckley, A. M., Brown, T. G. & Alonso, M. A. Full Poincaré beams. Opt. Express 18, 10777–10785 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  26. He, C. et al. Complex vectorial optics through gradient index lens cascades. Nat. Commun. 10, 4264 (2019). · DOI
  27. Rosales-Guzmán, C. et al. Polarisation-insensitive generation of complex vector modes from a digital micromirror device. Sci. Rep. 10, 10434 (2020). · DOI
  28. Chen, J. et al. Compact vectorial optical field generator based on a 10-megapixel resolution liquid crystal spatial light modulator. Opt. Commun. 495, 127112 (2021). · DOI
  29. Wu, H.-J. et al. Vectorial nonlinear optics: type-II second-harmonic generation driven by spin-orbit-coupled fields. Phys. Rev. A 100, 053840 (2019). · DOI
  30. Tang, Y. et al. Harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum cascade in nonlinear optical crystals. Nat. Photon. 14, 658–662 (2020). · DOI
  31. Marrucci, L., Manzo, C. & Paparo, D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 163905 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nassiri, M. G. & Brasselet, E. Multispectral management of the photon orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 213901 (2018). · DOI
  33. Devlin, R. C., Ambrosio, A., Rubin, N. A., Mueller, J. B. & Capasso, F. Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light. Science 358, 896–901 (2017). · DOI
  34. Forbes, A. Structured light from lasers. Laser Photonics Rev. 13, 1900140 (2019). · DOI
  35. Beckley, A. M., Brown, T. G. & Alonso, M. A. Full Poincaré beams II: partial polarization. Opt. Express 20, 9357–9362 (2012). · DOI
  36. Ma, Z. & Ramachandran, S. Propagation stability in optical fibers: role of path memory and angular momentum. Nanophotonics 10, 209–224 (2020). · DOI
  37. Biss, D. P. & Brown, T. Primary aberrations in focused radially polarized vortex beams. Opt. Express 12, 384–393 (2004). · DOI
  38. Youngworth, K. S. & Brown, T. G. Focusing of high numerical aperture cylindrical-vector beams. Opt. Express 7, 77–87 (2000). · DOI
  39. Mamani, S. et al. Transmission of classically entangled beams through mouse brain tissue. J. Biophotonics 11, e201800096 (2018). · DOI
  40. Gianani, I. et al. Transmission of vector vortex beams in dispersive media. Adv. Photon. 2, 036003 (2020). · DOI
  41. Biton, N., Kupferman, J. & Arnon, S. OAM light propagation through tissue. Sci. Rep. 11, 2407 (2021). · DOI
  42. Suprano, A. et al. Propagation of structured light through tissue-mimicking phantoms. Opt. Express 28, 35427–35437 (2020). · DOI
  43. Cox, M. A. et al. Structured light in turbulence. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 27, 1–21 (2020). · DOI
  44. Gu, Y., Korotkova, O. & Gbur, G. Scintillation of nonuniformly polarized beams in atmospheric turbulence. Opt. Letters 34, 2261–2263 (2009). · DOI
  45. Cheng, W., Haus, J. W. & Zhan, Q. Propagation of vector vortex beams through a turbulent atmosphere. Opt. Express 17, 17829–17836 (2009). · DOI
  46. Cai, Y., Lin, Q., Eyyuboğlu, H. T. & Baykal, Y. Average irradiance and polarization properties of a radially or azimuthally polarized beam in a turbulent atmosphere. Opt. Express 16, 7665–7673 (2008). · DOI
  47. Ji-Xiong, P., Tao, W., Hui-Chuan, L. & Cheng-Liang, L. Propagation of cylindrical vector beams in a turbulent atmosphere. Chinese Phys. B 19, 089201 (2010). · DOI
  48. Wang, T. & Pu, J. Propagation of non-uniformly polarized beams in a turbulent atmosphere. Opt. Commun. 281, 3617–3622 (2008). · DOI
  49. Cox, M. A., Rosales-Guzmán, C., Lavery, M. P. J., Versfeld, D. J. & Forbes, A. On the resilience of scalar and vector vortex modes in turbulence. Opt. Express 24, 18105–18113 (2016). · DOI
  50. Lochab, P., Senthilkumaran, P. & Khare, K. Designer vector beams maintaining a robust intensity profile on propagation through turbulence. Phys. Rev. A 98, 023831 (2018). · DOI
  51. Hufnagel, F. et al. Investigation of underwater quantum channels in a 30 meter flume tank using structured photons. New J. Phys. 22, 093074 (2020). · DOI
  52. Bouchard, F. et al. Quantum cryptography with twisted photons through an outdoor underwater channel. Opt. Express 26, 22563–22573 (2018). · DOI
  53. Ren, Y. et al. Orbital angular momentum-based space division multiplexing for high-capacity underwater optical communications. Sci. Rep. 6, 33306 (2016). · DOI
  54. Spreeuw, R. J. C. A classical analogy of entanglement. Found. Phys. 28, 361–374 (1998). · DOI
  55. Forbes, A., Aiello, A. & Ndagano, B. Classically entangled light. Prog. Opt. 64, 99–153 (2019).
  56. Kagalwala, K. H., Di Giuseppe, G., Abouraddy, A. F. & Saleh, B. E. Bell’s measure in classical optical coherence. Nat. Photon. 7, 72–78 (2013). · DOI
  57. Qian, X.-F. & Eberly, J. Entanglement and classical polarization states. Opt. Lett. 36, 4110–4112 (2011). · DOI
  58. Reyes, S. M., Nolan, D. A., Shi, L. & Alfano, R. R. Special classes of optical vector vortex beams are Majorana-like photons. Opt. Commun. 464, 125425 (2020). · DOI
  59. McLaren, M., Konrad, T. & Forbes, A. Measuring the nonseparability of vector vortex beams. Phys. Rev. A 92, 023833 (2015). · DOI
  60. Jiang, M., Luo, S. & Fu, S. Channel-state duality. Phys. Rev. A 87, 022310 (2013). · DOI
  61. Konrad, T. et al. Evolution equation for quantum entanglement. Nat. Phys. 4, 99–102 (2008). · DOI
  62. Valencia, N. H., Goel, S., McCutcheon, W., Defienne, H. & Malik, M. Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium. Nat. Phys. 16, 1112–1116 (2020). · DOI
  63. Zhan, Q. Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 1–57 (2009). · DOI
  64. Mamani, S. et al. Hybrid generation and analysis of vector vortex beams. Appl. Opt. 56, 2171–2175 (2017). · DOI
  65. Vaity, P., Banerji, J. & Singh, R. Measuring the topological charge of an optical vortex by using a tilted convex lens. Phys. Lett. A 377, 1154–1156 (2013). · DOI
  66. Holleczek, A., Aiello, A., Gabriel, C., Marquardt, C. & Leuchs, G. Classical and quantum properties of cylindrically polarized states of light. Opt. Express 19, 9714–9736 (2011). · DOI
  67. He, C., Antonello, J. & Booth, M. J. Vectorial adaptive optics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02606 (2021). · arXiv
  68. Hu, Q., He, C. & Booth, M. J. Arbitrary complex retarders using a sequence of spatial light modulators as the basis for adaptive polarisation compensation. J. Opt. 23, 065602 (2021). · DOI
  69. de Oliveira, A., da Silva, N. R., de Araújo, R. M., Ribeiro, P. S. & Walborn, S. Quantum optical description of phase conjugation of vector vortex beams in stimulated parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024048 (2020). · DOI
  70. Selyem, A., Rosales-Guzmán, C., Croke, S., Forbes, A. & Franke-Arnold, S. Basis-independent tomography and nonseparability witnesses of pure complex vectorial light fields by Stokes projections. Phys. Rev. A 100, 063842 (2019). · DOI
  71. Padgett, M. J. & Courtial, J. Poincaré-sphere equivalent for light beams containing orbital angular momentum. Opt. Lett. 24, 430–432 (1999). · DOI
  72. He, C., He, H., Chang, J., Chen, B., Ma, H. & Booth, M. J. Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 194 (2021). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nape, I., Singh, K., Klug, A., Buono, W., Rosales-Guzman, C., McWilliam, A., Franke-Arnold, S., Kritzinger, A., Forbes, P., Dudley, A., & Forbes, A.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2022-06-23
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
538-546
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
Cited by
175
References
2
Language
en
Funders
National Research Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review