The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutual information, neural networks and the renormalization group
Open accessAbstract
Physical systems differing in their microscopic details often display strikingly similar behaviour when probed at macroscopic scales. Those universal properties, largely determining their physical characteristics, are revealed by the powerful renormalization group (RG) procedure, which systematically retains ‘slow’ degrees of freedom and integrates out the rest. However, the important degrees of freedom may be difficult to identify. Here we demonstrate a machine-learning algorithm capable of identifying the relevant degrees of freedom and executing RG steps iteratively without any prior knowledge about the system. We introduce an artificial neural network based on a model-independent, information-theoretic characterization of a real-space RG procedure, which performs this task. We apply the algorithm to classical statistical physics problems in one and two dimensions. We demonstrate RG flow and extract the Ising critical exponent. Our results demonstrate that machine-learning techniques can extract abstract physical concepts and consequently become an integral part of theory- and model-building. Finding the relevant degrees of freedom of a system is a key step in any renormalization group procedure. But this can be difficult, particularly in strongly interacting systems. A machine-learning algorithm proves adept at identifying them for us.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 2×
“…applications of RSMI beyond physics are possible, since it offers a neural network implementation of a variant of the Information Bottleneck method [32], succesful in compression and clustering analyses [41]; it can also be used as a local-noise filtering pre-training stage for other machine…”
BackgroundMethodExact evolution equation for the effective potential
Wetterich, C. (1993) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90726-x · Cited by 2,272
Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 · Cited by 2,215
Machine learning phases of matter
Carrasquilla, J., & Melko, R. G. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4035 · Cited by 1,448
Why Does Deep and Cheap Learning Work So Well?
Lin, H. W., Tegmark, M., & Rolnick, D. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-017-1836-5 · Cited by 393
Cited by
Discovering Physical Concepts with Neural Networks
Iten, R., Metger, T., Wilming, H., del Rio, L., & Renner, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.010508 · Cited by 458
Neural Network Renormalization Group
Li, S.-H., & Wang, L. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.260601 · Cited by 140
Information Perspective to Probabilistic Modeling: Boltzmann Machines versus Born Machines
Cheng, S., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20080583 · Cited by 104
Precise measurement of quantum observables with neural-network estimators
Torlai, G., Mazzola, G., Carleo, G., & Mezzacapo, A. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.022060 · Cited by 80
Relevance in the Renormalization Group and in Information Theory
Gordon, A., Banerjee, A., Koch-Janusz, M., & Ringel, Z. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.240601 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch-Janusz, M., & Ringel, Z.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 578-582
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2607839392
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutual information, neural networks and the renormalization group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41567-018-0081-4
- The paper
- Koch-Janusz, M., & Ringel, Z. (2018). Mutual information, neural networks and the renormalization group. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0081-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.