The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Open accessAbstract
The dominant decay mode of atomic nuclei is beta decay (β-decay), a process that changes a neutron into a proton (and vice versa). This decay offers a window to physics beyond the standard model, and is at the heart of microphysical processes in stellar explosions and element synthesis in the Universe1–3. However, observed β-decay rates in nuclei have been found to be systematically smaller than for free neutrons: this 50-year-old puzzle about the apparent quenching of the fundamental coupling constant by a factor of about 0.75 (ref. 4) is without a first-principles theoretical explanation. Here, we demonstrate that this quenching arises to a large extent from the coupling of the weak force to two nucleons as well as from strong correlations in the nucleus. We present state-of-the-art computations of β-decays from light- and medium-mass nuclei to 100Sn by combining effective field theories of the strong and weak forces5 with powerful quantum many-body techniques6–8. Our results are consistent with experimental data and have implications for heavy element synthesis in neutron star mergers9–11 and predictions for the neutrino-less double-β-decay3, where an analogous quenching puzzle is a source of uncertainty in extracting the neutrino mass scale12. The difference between the β-decay rate predicted for free neutrons and that measured in real nuclei is explained by first-principles calculations to arise from strong correlations and the weak-force coupling between nucleons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics
Edmonds, A. R. (1957) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400884186 · Cited by 3,876
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces
Machleidt, R., & Entem, D. R. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,612
Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory
Entem, D. R., & Machleidt, R. (2003) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.68.041001 · Cited by 1,574
Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger
Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., Branchesi, M., Brocato, E., Campana, S., Cappellaro, E., Covino, S., D’Elia, V., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24298 · Cited by 974
Theory of core-collapse supernovae
JANKA, H., LANGANKE, K., MAREK, A., MARTINEZPINEDO, G., & MULLER, B. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.002 · Cited by 904
Barrett, B. R., Navrátil, P., & Vary, J. P. (2013) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003 · Cited by 789
Self-citationKorobkin, O., Rosswog, S., Arcones, A., & Winteler, C. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21859.x · Cited by 592
Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions
Hebeler, K., Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J., Nogga, A., & Schwenk, A. (2011) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.031301 · Cited by 585
Self-citation
Cited by
A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., & Wendt, K. A.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 428-431
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2919003435
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 21.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7
- The paper
- Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., & Wendt, K. A. (2019). Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.