The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the astrophysical robustness of the neutron star merger r-process: Robust r-process in neutron star mergers
Open accessAbstract
In this study we explore the nucleosynthesis in the dynamic ejecta of compact binary mergers. We are particularly interested in the question how sensitive the resulting abundance patterns are to the parameters of the merging system. Therefore, we systematically investigate combinations of neutron star masses in the range from 1.0 to 2.0 \Msun and, for completeness, we compare the results with those from two simulations of a neutron star black hole merger. The ejecta masses vary by a factor of five for the studied systems, but all amounts are (within the uncertainties of the merger rates) compatible with being a major source of cosmic r-process. The ejecta undergo a robust r-process nucleosynthesis which produces all the elements from the second to the third peak in close-to-solar ratios. Most strikingly, this r-process is extremely robust, all 23 investigated binary systems yield practically identical abundance patterns. This is mainly the result of the ejecta being extremely neutron rich (\ye $\approx0.04$) and the r-process path meandering along the neutron drip line so that the abundances are determined entirely by nuclear rather than by astrophysical properties. This robustness together with the ease with which both the second and third peak are reproduced make compact binary mergers the prime candidate for the source of the observed unique heavy r-process component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“…et al. 2009, 2011; Arcones et al. 2007; Arcones & Montes 2011; Winteler et al. 2012) but other sites have also been proposed including colliding neutron stars (Argast et al. 2004; Korobkin et al. 2012), and black hole/neutron star mergers (Surman et al. PASA (2014) doi:10.1017/pas.2014.xxx 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialVillar, V. A., Guillochon, J., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D., Cowperthwaite, P. S., Nicholl, M., Alexander, K. D., Blanchard, P. K., Chornock, R., Eftekhari, T., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9c84 · Cited by 574
Bauswein, A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/78 · Cited by 567
AN r -PROCESS KILONOVA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHORT-HARD GRB 130603B
Berger, E., Fong, W., & Chornock, R. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/l23 · Cited by 486
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Korobkin, O., Rosswog, S., Arcones, A., & Winteler, C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-08
- Volume
- 426
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1940-1949
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953069299
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the astrophysical robustness of the neutron star merger r-process: Robust r-process in neutron star mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21859.x
- The paper
- Korobkin, O., Rosswog, S., Arcones, A., & Winteler, C. (2012). On the astrophysical robustness of the neutron star merger r-process: Robust r-process in neutron star mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21859.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.