The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring the capabilities of quantum computers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Specifically, one half of the spontaneous Raman scattering errors are expected to result in leakage [53,54].”
From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Aaronson, S., & Gottesman, D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052328 · Cited by 1,515
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184 · cited 4×
“In our benchmarking experiments we use two transformations: the trivial transformation given by Q1(L) = {L−1}, and the transformation in whichQ1(L) consists of all 4w layers L̃−1 that satisfy U(L̃−1) = U(Q̃′L−1) for some Q̃′ ∈ Pw (which is similar to Pauli frame randomization [35, 44, 45]).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCharacterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., Bremner, M. J., Martinis, J. M., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · Cited by 1,175
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Knill, E., Leibfried, D., Reichle, R., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., Ozeri, R., Seidelin, S., & Wineland, D. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012307 · Cited by 1,019
Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504 · Cited by 797
Quantum Theory of Electrical Transport Phenomena
Kohn, W., & Luttinger, J. M. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.590 · Cited by 793
A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation
Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01272-0 · Cited by 725
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Loschmidt, J. Über den Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichts eines Systems von Körpern mit Rücksicht auf die Schwerkraft. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. 2, 128–142 (1876).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
Moses, S. A., Baldwin, C. H., Allman, M. S., Ancona, R., Ascarrunz, L., Barnes, C., Bartolotta, J., Bjork, B., Blanchard, P., Bohn, M., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041052 · Cited by 391
Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
Lubinski, T., Johri, S., Varosy, P., Coleman, J., Zhao, L., Necaise, J., Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., & Proctor, T. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3253761 · Cited by 242
Self-citationBenchmarking a trapped-ion quantum computer with 30 qubits
Chen, J.-S., Nielsen, E., Ebert, M., Inlek, V., Wright, K., Chaplin, V., Maksymov, A., Páez, E., Poudel, A., Maunz, P., et al. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-11-07-1516 · Cited by 103
Self-citationHuang, H.-L., Xu, X., Guo, C., Tian, G., Wei, S.-J., Sun, X., Bao, W., & Long, G. (2023) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-022-2057-y · Cited by 111
Quantum Volume in Practice: What Users Can Expect From NISQ Devices
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3184764 · Cited by 90
Benchmarking quantum computers
Proctor, T. J., Young, K. C., Baczewski, A., & Blume-Kohout, R. (2025) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00796-z · Cited by 116
Self-citationScalable Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Computers Using Mirror Circuits
Proctor, T., Seritan, S., Rudinger, K., Nielsen, E., Blume-Kohout, R., & Young, K. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.150502 · Cited by 68
Self-citationAyral, T., Louvet, T., Zhou, Y., Lambert, C., Stoudenmire, E. M., & Waintal, X. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020304 · Cited by 66
Benchmarking Quantum Coprocessors in an Application-Centric, Hardware-Agnostic, and Scalable Way
Martiel, S., Ayral, T., & Allouche, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2021.3090207 · Cited by 60
Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analogue quantum simulator
Shaw, A. L., Chen, Z., Choi, J., Mark, D. K., Scholl, P., Finkelstein, R., Elben, A., Choi, S., & Endres, M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07173-x · Cited by 64
Suppressing Quantum Circuit Errors Due to System Variability
Nation, P. D., & Treinish, M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010327 · Cited by 56
Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2025) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1002/nme.70073 · Cited by 56
Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., Brown, N. C., Ryan-Anderson, C., & Hayes, D. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-09-707 · Cited by 54
Verifiable Blind Quantum Computing with Trapped Ions and Single Photons
Drmota, P., Nadlinger, D. P., Main, D., Nichol, B. C., Ainley, E. M., Leichtle, D., Mantri, A., Kashefi, E., Srinivas, R., Araneda, G., et al. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.150604 · Cited by 51
Error-Robust Quantum Logic Optimization Using a Cloud Quantum Computer Interface
Carvalho, A. R. R., Ball, H., Biercuk, M. J., Hush, M., & Thomsen, F. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.064054 · Cited by 59
Quantum Fourier Transform Using Dynamic Circuits
Bäumer, E., Tripathi, V., Seif, A., Lidar, D. A., & Wang, D. S. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.150602 · Cited by 49
A Taxonomy of Small Markovian Errors
Blume-Kohout, R., Silva, M. P. D., Nielsen, E., Proctor, T. J., Rudinger, K., Sarovar, M., & Young, K. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020335 · Cited by 53
Self-citationMundada, P., Barbosa, A., Maity, S., Wang, Y., Merkh, T., Stace, T. M., Nielson, F. F., Carvalho, A. R. R., Hush, M., Biercuk, M. J., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.024034 · Cited by 51
Urban quantum leap: A comprehensive review and analysis of quantum technologies for smart cities
Bonab, A. B., Fedele, M., Formisano, V., & Rudko, I. (2023) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104459 · Cited by 47
Quantum utility – definition and assessment of a practical quantum advantage
Herrmann, N., Arya, D., Doherty, M. W., Mingare, A., Pillay, J. C., Preis, F., & Prestel, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW) · doi:10.1109/qsw59989.2023.00028 · Cited by 53
Optimized SWAP networks with equivalent circuit averaging for QAOA
Hashim, A., Rines, R., Omole, V., Naik, R., Kreikebaum, J. M., Santiago, D., Chong, F. T., Siddiqi, I. A., & Gokhale, P. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033028 · Cited by 46
Variational Quantum Pulse Learning
Liang, Z., Wang, H., Cheng, J., Ding, Y., Ren, H., Gao, Z., Hu, Z., Boning, D. S., Qian, X., Han, S., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00078 · Cited by 44
Protecting expressive circuits with a quantum error detection code
Self, C. N., Benedetti, M., & Amaro, D. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02282-2 · Cited by 31
Learning Correlated Noise in a 39-Qubit Quantum Processor
Harper, R., & Flammia, S. T. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040311 · Cited by 33
Practical Introduction to Benchmarking and Characterization of Quantum Computers
Hashim, A., Nguyen, L. B., Goss, N., Marinelli, B., Naik, R., Chistolini, T., Hines, J., Marceaux, J. P., Kim, Y., Gokhale, P., et al. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.030202 · Cited by 85
Self-citationAccelerating quantum computer developments
Alberts, G., Rol, M. A., Last, T., Broer, B. W., Bultink, C. C., Rijlaarsdam, M. S. C., & Hauwermeiren, A. E. V. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00107-w · Cited by 30
HamLib: A library of Hamiltonians for benchmarking quantum algorithms and hardware
Sawaya, N. P. D., Marti-Dafcik, D., Ho, Y., Tabor, D. P., Bernal, D. E., Magann, A. B., Premaratne, S., Dubey, P. K., Matsuura, A. Y., Bishop, N. C., et al. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-12-11-1559 · Cited by 39
SoK: Benchmarking the Performance of a Quantum Computer
Wang, J., Guo, G., & Shan, Z. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24101467 · Cited by 27
Impact of time-correlated noise on zero-noise extrapolation
Schultz, K., LaRose, R., Mari, A., Quiroz, G., Shammah, N., Clader, B. D., & Zeng, W. J. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052406 · Cited by 28
Rapid solution of logical equivalence problems by quantum computation algorithm
Zidan, M., Hegazy, S. F., Abdel‐Aty, M., & Obayya, S. S. A. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109844 · Cited by 25
A quantum hamiltonian simulation benchmark
Dong, Y., Whaley, K. B., & Lin, L. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00636-x · Cited by 31
Quantum circuit fidelity estimation using machine learning
Vadali, A., Kshirsagar, R., Shyamsundar, P., & Perdue, G. (2023) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-023-00121-4 · Cited by 24
Demonstrating Scalable Randomized Benchmarking of Universal Gate Sets
Hines, J., Lu, M., Naik, R., Hashim, A., Ville, J.-L., Mitchell, B., Kreikebaum, J. M., Santiago, D., Seritan, S., Nielsen, E., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041030 · Cited by 32
Self-citationScaling of energy and power in a large quantum battery-charger model
Gao, L., Cheng, C., He, W., Mondaini, R., Guan, X.-W., & Lin, H. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043150 · Cited by 22
Testing Platform-Independent Quantum Error Mitigation on Noisy Quantum Computers
Russo, V., Mari, A., Shammah, N., LaRose, R., & Zeng, W. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3305232 · Cited by 30
Quantum algorithms for scientific computing
Au-Yeung, R., Camino, B., Rathore, O., & Kendon, V. M. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad85f0 · Cited by 37
Algorithmic QUBO formulations for k -SAT and hamiltonian cycles
Nüßlein, J., Gabor, T., Linnhoff–Popien, C., & Feld, S. (2022) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/3520304.3533952 · Cited by 18
Tan, A. T. K., Sun, S.-N., Tazhigulov, R. N., Chan, G. K., & Minnich, A. J. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032614 · Cited by 22
Learning how to dynamically decouple by optimizing rotational gates
Rahman, A., Egger, D. J., & Arenz, C. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.054074 · Cited by 26
In complexity we trust: A systematic literature review of urban quantum technologies
Bonab, A. B., Fedele, M., Formisano, V., & Rudko, I. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122642 · Cited by 17
Fair Sampling Error Analysis on NISQ Devices
Golden, J. K., Bärtschi, A., O’Malley, D., & Eidenbenz, S. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3510857 · Cited by 17
Volumetric Benchmarking of Error Mitigation with Qermit
Cîrstoiu, C., Dilkes, S., Mills, D., Sivarajah, S., & Duncan, R. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-13-1059 · Cited by 16
Benchmarking Quantum Gates and Circuits
Tripathi, V., Kowsari, D., Saurav, K., Zhang, H., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00870 · Cited by 22
Benchmarking quantum logic operations relative to thresholds for fault tolerance
Hashim, A., Seritan, S., Proctor, T. J., Rudinger, K., Goss, N., Naik, R., Kreikebaum, J. M., Santiago, D., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00764-y · Cited by 23
Self-citationUsing Shor’s algorithm on near term Quantum computers: a reduced version
Rossi, M. S., Asproni, L., Caputo, D., Rossi, S., Cusinato, A., Marini, R., Agosti, A., & Magagnini, M. (2022) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-022-00072-2 · Cited by 19
Highly optimized quantum circuits synthesized via data-flow engines
Rakyta, P., Morse, G., Nádori, J., Majnay-Takács, Z., Mencer, O., & Zimborás, Z. (2024) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112756 · Cited by 13
Error estimation in current noisy quantum computers
Aseginolaza, U., Sobrino, N., Sobrino, G., Jornet-Somoza, J., & Borge, J. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04384-z · Cited by 12
Defining Best Practices for Quantum Benchmarks
Amico, M., Zhang, H., Jurcevic, P., Bishop, L. S., Nation, P., Wack, A., & McKay, D. C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00084 · Cited by 16
Fully Scalable Randomized Benchmarking Without Motion Reversal
Hines, J., Hothem, D., Blume-Kohout, R., Whaley, B., & Proctor, T. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.030334 · Cited by 12
Self-citationLeveraging randomized compiling for the quantum imaginary-time-evolution algorithm
Ville, J.-L., Morvan, A., Hashim, A., Naik, R., Lu, M., Mitchell, B., Kreikebaum, J. M., O’Brien, K. P., Wallman, J. J., Hincks, I., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033140 · Cited by 30
Cao, S., Lall, D., Bakr, M. S., Campanaro, G., Fasciati, S. D., Wills, J., Chidambaram, V., Shteynas, B., Rungger, I., & Leek, P. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.120802 · Cited by 14
Quantum error reduction with deep neural network applied at the post-processing stage
Zhukov, A., & Pogosov, W. V. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03433-9 · Cited by 13
Empirical Learning of Dynamical Decoupling on Quantum Processors
Tong, C., Zhang, H., & Pokharel, B. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/h7pq-s159 · Cited by 10
Nanoionics enabled atomic point contact construction and quantum conductance effects
Gao, R., Ye, X., Hu, C., Zhang, Z., Ji, X., Zhang, Y., Meng, X., Yang, H., Zhu, X., & Li, R. (2024) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/d4mh00916a · Cited by 9
Escofet, P., Rodrigo, S., García-Sáez, A., Alarcón, E., Abadal, S., & Almudéver, C. G. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aded2f · Cited by 12
A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity
Ransford, A., Allman, M. S., Arkinstall, J., Campora, J. P., Cooper, S. F., Delaney, R. D., Dreiling, J. M., Estey, B., Figgatt, C., Hall, A., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10676-4 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBenchmarking Quantum Generative Learning: A Study on Scalability and Noise Resilience using QUARK
Kiwit, F. J., Wolf, M. A., Marso, M., Ross, P., Lorenz, J. M., Riofrío, C. A., & Luckow, A. (2024) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-024-00864-7 · Cited by 9
Benchmarking quantum computers: towards a standard performance evaluation approach
Acuaviva, A., Aguirre, D., Peña, R., & Sanz, M. (2026) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae4269 · Cited by 24
Current Trends and Advances in Quantum Navigation for Maritime Applications: A Comprehensive Review
Sambataro, O., Costanzi, R., Alves, J., Caiti, A., Paglierani, P., Petroccia, R., & Munafò, A. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2025.3538941 · Cited by 17
Chatterjee, A., Rappaport, S., Giri, A., Johri, S., Proctor, T. J., Neira, D. E. B., Sathe, P., & Lubinski, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2025.3558090 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWang, D., Chen, X., Liu, X., Li, Y., Piao, Z., & Li, H. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18164283 · Cited by 7
Predictive Models from Quantum Computer Benchmarks
Hothem, D., Hines, J., Nataraj, K., Blume-Kohout, R., & Proctor, T. J. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00086 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLearning to rank quantum circuits for hardware-optimized performance enhancement
Hartnett, G. S., Barbosa, A., Mundada, P., Hush, M., Biercuk, M. J., & Baum, Y. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-11-27-1542 · Cited by 12
Efficient flexible characterization of quantum processors with nested error models
Nielsen, E., Rudinger, K., Proctor, T. J., Young, K. C., & Blume-Kohout, R. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac20b9 · Cited by 8
Self-citationTowards a Quantum Benchmark Suite with Standardized KPIs
Becker, C. K., Tcholtchev, N., Gheorghe-Pop, I.-D., Bock, S., Seidel, R., & Hauswirth, M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C) · doi:10.1109/icsa-c54293.2022.00038 · Cited by 7
Quantum circuit debugging and sensitivity analysis via local inversions
Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Proctor, T. J., Rudinger, K., & Sarovar, M. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-09-921 · Cited by 8
Self-citationImpact of Unreliable Devices on Stability of Quantum Computations
Dasgupta, S., & Humble, T. S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3682071 · Cited by 46
Non-Markovian quantum gate set tomography
Li, Z., Zheng, C., Meng, F., Zeng, H., Luan, T., Zhang, Z., & Yu, X. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad3d80 · Cited by 6
Calibration and Performance Evaluation of a Superconducting Quantum Processor in an HPC Center
Deng, X., Pogorzalek, S., Vigneau, F., Yang, P., Schulz, M., & Schulz, L. B. (2024) · ISC High Performance (ISC) · doi:10.23919/isc.2024.10528924 · Cited by 6
Field-based formalism for calculating multiqubit exchange-coupling rates for transmon qubits
Khan, G., & Roth, T. E. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.064084 · Cited by 6
Simulating Floquet scrambling circuits on trapped-ion quantum computers
Seki, K., Kikuchi, Y., Hayata, T., & Yunoki, S. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023032 · Cited by 13
Unifying Non-Markovian Characterization with an Efficient and Self-Consistent Framework
White, G. A. L., Jurcevic, P., Hill, C. D., & Modi, K. K. (2025) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021047 · Cited by 6
Qubit Assignment Using Time Reversal
Peters, E., Shyamsundar, P., Li, A. C. Y., & Perdue, G. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040333 · Cited by 8
Robustness of chaotic behavior in iterated quantum protocols
Portik, A., Kálmán, O., Jex, I., & Kiss, T. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042410 · Cited by 5
Measuring error rates of mid-circuit measurements
Hothem, D., Hines, J., Baldwin, C., Gresh, D., Blume-Kohout, R., & Proctor, T. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60923-x · Cited by 5
Self-citationQuAS: Quantum Application Score for Benchmarking the Utility of Quantum Computers
Mesman, K. J., van der Schoot, W., Möller, M., & Neumann, N. M. P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00111 · Cited by 5
Tosi, L., & Rocca, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2023.3344878 · Cited by 5
Construction and volumetric benchmarking of quantum computing noise models
Weber, T., Borras, K., Jansen, K., Krücker, D., & Riebisch, M. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad406c · Cited by 8
A Theory of Direct Randomized Benchmarking
Polloreno, A., Carignan-Dugas, A., Hines, J., Blume-Kohout, R., Young, K. C., & Proctor, T. J. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-09-05-1848 · Cited by 15
Self-citationAppQSim: Application-oriented benchmarks for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer
Granet, E., & Dreyer, H. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/qt55-7d6r · Cited by 9
Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum processes
Zheng, C., Yu, X., & Wang, K. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00797-3 · Cited by 7
Characterizing non-Markovian and coherent errors in quantum simulation
Prakash, A., & Madhusudhana, B. H. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043127 · Cited by 4
Q‐fid: Quantum Circuit Fidelity Improvement with LSTM Networks
Mao, Y., Shresthamali, S., & Kondo, M. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500022 · Cited by 7
Testing quantum computers with the protocol of quantum state matching
Ortega, A., Kálmán, O., & Kiss, T. (2023) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acb2ff · Cited by 5
Varvelis, E., & Divincenzo, D. P. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.144201 · Cited by 8
Simulating sparse SYK model with a randomized algorithm on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Granet, E., Kikuchi, Y., Dreyer, H., & Rinaldi, E. (2026) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01206-1 · Cited by 3
Joint encryption and error correction for secure quantum communication
Jha, N., Parakh, A., & Subramaniam, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75212-8 · Cited by 3
Scalable Full-Stack Benchmarks for Quantum Computers
Hines, J., & Proctor, T. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3404502 · Cited by 12
Self-citationCyber Security in the Post Quantum Computer Era: Threats and Perspectives
Iqbal, M. S., Sajid, A., & Malik, R. (2025) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81481-5_2 · Cited by 3
Analysis on noise impact in algorithm-based quantum computing benchmark
Wang, J., Zhang, M., Lai, J., Zhao, W., & Zhang, H. (2022) · International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN) · doi:10.1109/icocn55511.2022.9901092 · Cited by 3
A Practical Framework for Assessing the Performance of Observable Estimation in Quantum Simulation
Niu, S., Kökcü, E., Johri, S., Ramesh, A., Chatterjee, A., Neira, D. E. B., Camps, D., & Lubinski, T. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00050 · Cited by 5
Magic states in the asymmetric quantum Rabi model
Campos-Uscanga, A., Rodríguez, E. B., Martínez, E. P., & Bastarrachea-Magnani, M. A. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/qmw5-2wbf · Cited by 2
Distributing Quantum Computations, Shot-Wise
Bisicchia, G., Clemente, G., García-Alonso, J. M., Murillo, J. M., D’Elia, M., & Antonio Brogi, A. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17110507 · Cited by 9
Scalable Programming Workflows for Validation of Quantum Computers
Nguyen, T., Oftelie, L. B., Lyakh, D. I., Lotshaw, P. C., McCaskey, A., Bennink, R. S., Leyton‐Ortega, V., Pooser, R. C., Humble, T. S., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Quantum Computing Software (QCS) · doi:10.1109/qcs54837.2021.00013 · Cited by 2
Qubit Condensation for Assessing Efficacy of Molecular Simulation on Quantum Computers
Sager-Smith, L. M., Smart, S. E., & Mazziotti, D. A. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.3c02583 · Cited by 2
A Testing Pipeline for Quantum Computing Applications
Becker, C. K., Gheorghe-Pop, I.-D., & Tcholtchev, N. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW) · doi:10.1109/qsw59989.2023.00016 · Cited by 2
A user-centric quantum benchmarking test suite and evaluation framework
Liu, W., Wang, F., Lin, H., & Shang, J. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04154-3 · Cited by 2
Quantum Gates for Electronics Engineers
Borgarino, M., & Badiali, A. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12224664 · Cited by 2
Learning a Quantum Computer's Capability
Hothem, D., Young, K. C., Catanach, T., & Proctor, T. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3430215 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Proctor, T., Rudinger, K., Young, K., Nielsen, E., & Blume-Kohout, R.
- Affiliations
- Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Proctor, Timothy
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2021-12-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-79
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W4206310632
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- DOE | LDRD | Sandia National Laboratories
- DOE | Office of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- quantum computing hardware, benchmarking, hardware errors, error metrics, program structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review