The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring the capabilities of quantum computers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Specifically, one half of the spontaneous Raman scattering errors are expected to result in leakage [53,54].”
From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Aaronson, S., & Gottesman, D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052328 · Cited by 1,515
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184 · cited 4×
“In our benchmarking experiments we use two transformations: the trivial transformation given by Q1(L) = {L−1}, and the transformation in whichQ1(L) consists of all 4w layers L̃−1 that satisfy U(L̃−1) = U(Q̃′L−1) for some Q̃′ ∈ Pw (which is similar to Pauli frame randomization [35, 44, 45]).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCharacterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., Bremner, M. J., Martinis, J. M., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · Cited by 1,175
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Knill, E., Leibfried, D., Reichle, R., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., Ozeri, R., Seidelin, S., & Wineland, D. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012307 · Cited by 1,019
Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504 · Cited by 797
Quantum Theory of Electrical Transport Phenomena
Kohn, W., & Luttinger, J. M. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.590 · Cited by 793
A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation
Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01272-0 · Cited by 725
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Loschmidt, J. Über den Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichts eines Systems von Körpern mit Rücksicht auf die Schwerkraft. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. 2, 128–142 (1876).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
Moses, S. A., Baldwin, C. H., Allman, M. S., Ancona, R., Ascarrunz, L., Barnes, C., Bartolotta, J., Bjork, B., Blanchard, P., Bohn, M., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041052 · Cited by 391
Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
Lubinski, T., Johri, S., Varosy, P., Coleman, J., Zhao, L., Necaise, J., Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., & Proctor, T. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3253761 · Cited by 242
Self-citationBenchmarking a trapped-ion quantum computer with 30 qubits
Chen, J.-S., Nielsen, E., Ebert, M., Inlek, V., Wright, K., Chaplin, V., Maksymov, A., Páez, E., Poudel, A., Maunz, P., et al. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-11-07-1516 · Cited by 103
Self-citationHuang, H.-L., Xu, X., Guo, C., Tian, G., Wei, S.-J., Sun, X., Bao, W., & Long, G. (2023) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-022-2057-y · Cited by 111
Quantum Volume in Practice: What Users Can Expect From NISQ Devices
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., & Eidenbenz, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3184764 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Proctor, T., Rudinger, K., Young, K., Nielsen, E., & Blume-Kohout, R.
- Affiliations
- Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Proctor, Timothy
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2021-12-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-79
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W4206310632
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- DOE | LDRD | Sandia National Laboratories
- DOE | Office of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- quantum computing hardware, benchmarking, hardware errors, error metrics, program structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
