Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions
Abstract
The notion that stress and cancer are interlinked has dominated lay discourse for decades. More recent animal studies indicate that stress can substantially facilitate cancer progression through modulating most hallmarks of cancer, and molecular and systemic mechanisms mediating these effects have been elucidated. However, available clinical evidence for such deleterious effects is inconsistent, as epidemiological and stress-reducing clinical interventions have yielded mixed effects on cancer mortality. In this Review, we describe and discuss specific mediating mechanisms identified by preclinical research, and parallel clinical findings. We explain the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical outcomes, through pointing to experimental strengths leveraged by animal studies and through discussing methodological and conceptual obstacles that prevent clinical studies from reflecting the impacts of stress. We suggest approaches to circumvent such obstacles, based on targeting critical phases of cancer progression that are more likely to be stress-sensitive; pharmacologically limiting adrenergic-inflammatory responses triggered by medical procedures; and focusing on more vulnerable populations, employing personalized pharmacological and psychosocial approaches. Recent clinical trials support our hypothesis that psychological and/or pharmacological inhibition of excess adrenergic and/or inflammatory stress signalling, especially alongside cancer treatments, could save lives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a longitudinal study of chronic pain patients (n = 133), those with arthritis, back or neck pain, or multiple comorbid pain conditions experienced significant improvements in pain intensity and functional limitations after participating in a BSRP.
“Between 1997 and 2003, a longitudinal study of chronic pain patients (n = 133) showed that those with arthritis, back or neck pain, or multiple comorbid pain conditions experienced significant improvements in pain intensity and functional limitations after participating in a Behavioral Stress Reduction Program (BSRP) [10,11].”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 329 · Cited by 348
- Authors
- Eckerling, A., Ricon-Becker, I., Sorski, L., Sandbank, E., & Ben-Eliyahu, S.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2021-09-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 767-785
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- OpenAlex
- W3196865736
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 329
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- psychological stress, tumor progression, cancer hallmarks, inflammation, cancer mortality, psychosocial interventions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review