Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 309 of the 309 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular and molecular pathobiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Open access
Mishra, Sumita, Kass, David A.·2021·Nature Reviews Cardiology

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) affects half of all patients with heart failure worldwide, is increasing in prevalence, confers substantial morbidity and mortality, and has very few effective treatments. HFpEF is arguably the greatest unmet medical need in cardiovascular disease. Although HFpEF was initially considered to be a haemodynamic disorder characterized by hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction, the pandemics of obesity and diabetes mellitus have modified the HFpEF syndrome, which is now recognized to be a multisystem disorder involving the heart, lungs, kidneys, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, vascular system, and immune and inflammatory signalling. This multiorgan involvement makes HFpEF difficult to model in experimental animals because the condition is not simply cardiac hypertrophy and hypertension with abnormal myocardial relaxation. However, new animal models involving both haemodynamic and metabolic disease, and increasing efforts to examine human pathophysiology, are revealing new signalling pathways and potential therapeutic targets. In this Review, we discuss the cellular and molecular pathobiology of HFpEF, with the major focus being on mechanisms relevant to the heart, because most research has focused on this organ. We also highlight the involvement of other important organ systems, including the lungs, kidneys and skeletal muscle, efforts to characterize patients with the use of systemic biomarkers, and ongoing therapeutic efforts. Our objective is to provide a roadmap of the signalling pathways and mechanisms of HFpEF that are being characterized and which might lead to more patient-specific therapies and improved clinical outcomes. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) affects half of all patients with heart failure worldwide. In this Review, Mishra and Kass and provide a roadmap of the signalling pathways and mechanisms of HFpEF that are being characterized and which might lead to more patient-specific therapies and improved clinical outcomes. The historical focus of studies into the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been on diastolic dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis. However, HFpEF actually involves many different components affecting both systolic and diastolic heart function and also other organs and systems, including the lungs, kidneys, vasculature, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Preclinical studies, particularly those combining obesity and metabolic defects with haemodynamic and cardiac disease as occurs in the majority of patients with HFpEF, are beginning to reveal novel molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. The proposed molecular and cellular abnormalities in HFpEF and those observed in diabetes mellitus and obesity overlap substantially, including metabolic defects in fuel utilization and efficiency, inflammatory responses, lipotoxicity, pathological growth of myocytes and loss of cytoprotective signalling. In addition to exploring novel haemodynamic interventions with drugs and devices, new therapies are targeting pleiotropic signalling cascades to counteract changes in metabolic, inflammatory and pathological stress pathways. The historical focus of studies into the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been on diastolic dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis. However, HFpEF actually involves many different components affecting both systolic and diastolic heart function and also other organs and systems, including the lungs, kidneys, vasculature, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Preclinical studies, particularly those combining obesity and metabolic defects with haemodynamic and cardiac disease as occurs in the majority of patients with HFpEF, are beginning to reveal novel molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. The proposed molecular and cellular abnormalities in HFpEF and those observed in diabetes mellitus and obesity overlap substantially, including metabolic defects in fuel utilization and efficiency, inflammatory responses, lipotoxicity, pathological growth of myocytes and loss of cytoprotective signalling. In addition to exploring novel haemodynamic interventions with drugs and devices, new therapies are targeting pleiotropic signalling cascades to counteract changes in metabolic, inflammatory and pathological stress pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41569-020-00480-6

Cites

309 of 309 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 309 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Dodek, A., Kassebaum, D. G. & Bristow, J. D. Pulmonary edema in coronary-artery disease without cardiomegaly. Paradox of the stiff heart. N. Engl. J. Med. 286, 1347–1350 (1972). · doi:10.1056/nejm197206222862507
  2. Sztechman, D., Czarzasta, K., Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska, A., Szczepanska-Sadowska, E. & Zera, T. Aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptors in regulation of the cardiovascular system and pathological remodelling of the heart and arteries. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 69, 829–845 (2018).
  3. Lopez, B. et al. Is plasma cardiotrophin-1 a marker of hypertensive heart disease? J. Hypertens. 23, 625–632 (2005). · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000160221.09468.d3
  4. Kapur, S. et al. Early development of intracellular calcium cycling defects in intact hearts of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 299, H1843–H1853 (2010). · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00623.2010
  5. Tokudome, T. et al. Regulator of G-protein signaling subtype 4 mediates antihypertrophic effect of locally secreted natriuretic peptides in the heart. Circulation 117, 2329–2339 (2008). · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.732990
  6. Toyota, E. et al. Dynamics of flow velocities in endocardial and epicardial coronary arterioles. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288, H1598–H1603 (2005). · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01103.2003
  7. Zakeri, R. & Mohammed, S. F. Epidemiology of right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 12, 295–301 (2015). · doi:10.1007/s11897-015-0267-3
  8. Kanjanahattakij, N. et al. High right ventricular stroke work index is associated with worse kidney function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Cardiorenal Med. 8, 123–129 (2018). · doi:10.1159/000486629
  9. Kaye, D. M., Nanayakkara, S., Vizi, D., Byrne, M. & Mariani, J. A. Effects of milrinone on rest and exercise hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 67, 2554–2556 (2016). · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.539

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, S., & Kass, D. A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Published
2021-01-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
400-423
ISSN
  • 1759-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5010
OpenAlex
W3119803061
Cited by
417
References
309
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular and molecular pathobiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41569-020-00480-6
The paper
Mishra, S., & Kass, D. A. (2021). Cellular and molecular pathobiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nature Reviews Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00480-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.