Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism

Open access
Lutsey, Pamela L., Zakai, Neil A.·2023·Nature Reviews Cardiology

Abstract

In this Review, Lutsey and Zakai describe the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism, including incidence, risk factors and outcomes; summarize opportunities for primordial, primary and secondary prevention; and highlight the importance of reducing disparities in venous thromboembolism incidence and management, and opportunities to reduce them. Venous thromboembolism, that consists of the interrelated conditions deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is an under-appreciated vascular disease. In Western regions, approximately 1 in 12 individuals will be diagnosed with venous thromboembolism in their lifetime. Rates of venous thromboembolism are lower in Asia, but data from other regions are sparse. Numerous risk factors for venous thromboembolism have been identified, which can be classified as acute or subacute triggers (provoking factors that increase the risk of venous thromboembolism) and basal or acquired risk factors (which can be modifiable or static). Approximately 20% of individuals who have a venous thromboembolism event die within 1 year (although often from the provoking condition), and complications are common among survivors. Fortunately, opportunities exist for primordial prevention (prevention of the development of underlying risk factors), primary prevention (management of risk factors among individuals at high risk of the condition) and secondary prevention (prevention of recurrent events) of venous thromboembolism. In this Review, we describe the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism, including the incidence, risk factors, outcomes and opportunities for prevention. Meaningful health disparities exist in both the incidence and outcomes of venous thromboembolism. We also discuss these disparities as well as opportunities to reduce them. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) surveillance systems are lacking, but VTE is estimated to affect one to two individuals per 1,000 person-years in Europe and the USA, with lower rates in other regions. Risk factors for VTE are varied, and include triggers (acute and subacute), basal risk factors (demographic, behavioural, anthropometric and genetic) and acquired clinical risk factors. Numerous complications can occur after a VTE event, and quality of life can decrease. Reduction in the risk of VTE and adverse outcomes after a VTE event will require prevention across the spectrum of prevention stages (primordial, primary and secondary) and increased awareness of this under-appreciated condition. Disparities exist in VTE incidence and outcomes; reducing these disparities will require individual, systems-based and societal commitments to equity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41569-022-00787-6

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 203 references

Metadata

Authors
Lutsey, P. L., & Zakai, N. A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Published
2022-10-18
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
248-262
ISSN
  • 1759-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5010
OpenAlex
W4306725818
Cited by
507
References
203
FWCI
27.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41569-022-00787-6
The paper
Lutsey, P. L., & Zakai, N. A. (2023). Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nature Reviews Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-022-00787-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.