Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 959

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy

Open access
Shah, Nirali N., Fry, Terry J.·2019·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The successes with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in early clinical trials involving patients with pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or B cell lymphomas have revolutionized anticancer therapy, providing a potentially curative option for patients who are refractory to standard treatments. These trials resulted in rapid FDA approvals of anti-CD19 CAR T cell products for both ALL and certain types of B cell lymphoma — the first approved gene therapies in the USA. However, growing experience with these agents has revealed that remissions will be brief in a substantial number of patients owing to poor CAR T cell persistence and/or cancer cell resistance resulting from antigen loss or modulation. Furthermore, the initial experience with CAR T cells has highlighted challenges associated with manufacturing a patient-specific therapy. Understanding the limitations of CAR T cell therapy will be critical to realizing the full potential of this novel treatment approach. Herein, we discuss the factors that can preclude durable remissions following CAR T cell therapy, with a primary focus on the resistance mechanisms that underlie disease relapse. We also provide an overview of potential strategies to overcome these obstacles in an effort to more effectively incorporate this unique therapeutic strategy into standard treatment paradigms.The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an important advance in the treatment of cancer. Herein, the authors outline the key limitations of CAR T cell therapy, with a focus on mechanisms of resistance, and discuss strategies to improve the efficacy and broaden the applicability of this promising therapeutic approach.Key pointsChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is a highly effective form of adoptive cell therapy, as demonstrated by the remission rates in patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or large B cell lymphoma, which have supported FDA approvals.A complete understanding of the limitations of CAR T cell therapy will help to identify crucial areas requiring further research to improve patient outcomes.Factors that can preclude durable remissions following CAR T cell therapy include CAR T cell manufacturing issues, limited CAR T cell expansion and/or persistence, various resistance mechanisms and toxicities.Various intuitive strategies to overcome these obstacles are being investigated in order to optimize this unique therapeutic strategy and expand the indications for treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-019-0184-6

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 959

Metadata

Authors
Shah, N. N., & Fry, T. J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
372-385
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W2919051790
Cited by
959
References
22
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-019-0184-6
The paper
Shah, N. N., & Fry, T. J. (2019). Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0184-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.