Cited by 27Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsCAR-T cell therapy researchMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GPRC5D as a novel immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma

Nath, Karthik, Costa, Bruno A., Mailankody, Sham·2023·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-023-00735-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Mailankody, S. & Landgren, O. T-cell engagers — modern immune-based therapies for multiple myeloma. New Engl. J. Med. 387, 558–561 (2022). · DOI
  2. Mailankody, S. et al. GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells for myeloma. New Engl. J. Med. 387, 1196–1206 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bal, S. et al. Clinical activity of BMS-986393 (CC-95266), a G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM): first results from a phase 1, multicenter, open-label study. Blood 140, 883–885 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Huang, H. et al. Phase I open-label single arm study of GPRC5D CAR T-cells (OriCAR-017) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS). J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 8004–8004 (2022). · DOI
  5. Carlo-Stella, C. et al. RG6234, a GPRC5DxCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, is highly active in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated intravenous (IV) and first subcutaneous (SC) results from a phase I dose-escalation study. Blood 140, 397–399 (2022). · DOI
  6. Falchi, L., Vardhana, S. A. & Salles, G. A. Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma: promises, unknowns and opportunities. Blood https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021011994 (2022). · DOI
  7. Fernández de Larrea, C. et al. Defining an optimal dual-targeted CAR T-cell therapy approach simultaneously targeting BCMA and GPRC5D to prevent BCMA escape-driven relapse in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov. 1, 146–154 (2020). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nath, K., Costa, B. A., & Mailankody, S.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Mailankody, Sham
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
281-282
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W4318767939
Cited by
27
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
GPRC5D, multiple myeloma, immunotherapy targets, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, immune checkpoint
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunotherapy, Multiple Myeloma, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review