Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes

Open access
Melmed, Shlomo, Bronstein, Marcello D., Chanson, Philippe, Klibanski, Anne, Casanueva, Felipe F., Wass, John A. H., Strasburger, Christian J., Luger, Anton, Clemmons, David R., Giustina, Andrea·2018·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

The 11th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in April 2017 was convened to update recommendations on therapeutic outcomes for patients with acromegaly. Consensus guidelines on the medical management of acromegaly were last published in 2014; since then, new pharmacological agents have been developed and new approaches to treatment sequencing have been considered. Thirty-seven experts in the management of patients with acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in drug approvals, clinical practice standards and clinical opinion. They considered current treatment outcome goals with a focus on the impact of current and emerging somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists and dopamine agonists on biochemical, clinical, tumour mass and surgical outcomes. The participants discussed factors that would determine pharmacological choices as well as the proposed place of each agent in the guidelines. We present consensus recommendations highlighting how acromegaly management could be optimized in clinical practice. Acromegaly is usually caused by a pituitary adenoma that secretes growth hormone; treatment of acromegaly and its comorbidities is often complex. In this Consensus Statement, Shlomo Melmed and colleagues provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with acromegaly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Melmed, S., Bronstein, M. D., Chanson, P., Klibanski, A., Casanueva, F. F., Wass, J. A. H., Strasburger, C. J., Luger, A., Clemmons, D. R., & Giustina, A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2018-07-26
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
552-561
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W2884285576
Cited by
561
References
91
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5
The paper
Melmed, S., Bronstein, M. D., Chanson, P., Klibanski, A., Casanueva, F. F., Wass, J. A. H., Strasburger, C. J., Luger, A., Clemmons, D. R., & Giustina, A. (2018). A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.