The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skeletal infections: microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management
Open accessAbstract
Osteomyelitis remains one of the greatest risks in orthopaedic surgery. Although many organisms are linked to skeletal infections, Staphylococcus aureus remains the most prevalent and devastating causative pathogen. Important discoveries have uncovered novel mechanisms of S. aureus pathogenesis and persistence within bone tissue, including implant-associated biofilms, abscesses and invasion of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network. However, little clinical progress has been made in the prevention and eradication of skeletal infection as treatment algorithms and outcomes have only incrementally changed over the past half century. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms of persistence and immune evasion in S. aureus infection of the skeletal system as well as features of other osteomyelitis-causing pathogens in implant-associated and native bone infections. We also describe how the host fails to eradicate bacterial bone infections, and how this new information may lead to the development of novel interventions. Finally, we discuss the clinical management of skeletal infection, including osteomyelitis classification and strategies to treat skeletal infections with emerging technologies that could translate to the clinic in the future. Osteomyelitis is an infection of bone that arises when a pathogen colonizes bone tissue owing to injury or surgery. In this Review, Masters and colleagues explore the microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management of bone infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Infected bone defects (IBDs) pose an arduous orthopedic healthcare challenge due to their complex pathophysiology: resilient biofilms and intracellular pathogens that evade conventional antibiotics, an immunosuppressive microenvironment that impairs bone regeneration, and large defects that are difficult to heal following surgical debridement [1,2].”
From Nanocatalytic magnesium osteoimplants with biodegradable self-adaptive interfaces for therapeutic repair of infected bone defects (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Items 201–213 of 213
The Contemporary Epidemiology, Microbiology and Management of Chronic Osteomyelitis in US Children
McNeil, J. C., Joseph, M., Sommer, L. M., et al. (2021) · The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0000000000003067 · Cited by 22
Kaimkhani, G. M., Siddiqui, A. A., Rasheed, N., et al. (2018) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.2872 · Cited by 20
Brodell, J. D., Kozakiewicz, L. N., Hoffman, S. L., et al. (2020) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/1071100720962480 · Cited by 19
Muthukrishnan, G., Beck, C. A., Owen, J. R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research® · doi:10.1002/jor.24955 · Cited by 18
Self-citationAcinetobacter baumannii is not Associated with Osteomyelitis in a Rat Model: A Pilot Study
Collinet‐Adler, S., Castro, C. A., Ledonio, C. G. T., et al. (2010) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1488-0 · Cited by 15
Philadelphia 2013: International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection
Youssef, B., Pavlou, G., & Tsiridis, E. E. (2014) · Hip International · doi:10.5301/hipint.5000127 · Cited by 14
Mao, Y., Valour, F., Nguyen, N. T. Q., et al. (2021) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01832-20 · Cited by 12
Microorganisms Associated With Osteomyelitis of the Foot and Ankle
King, C. M., Castellucci-Garza, F. M., Lyon, L. L., Doyle, M. D., Nimick, C. J., & Williams, M. L. (2020) · The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.032 · Cited by 11
Pathological Researches Respecting the Diseases of Joints
Brodie, B. C. (1813) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/095952871300400115 · Cited by 10
Clinical Differences Between Monomicrobial and Polymicrobial Vertebral Osteomyelitis
Issa, K., Pourtaheri, S., Stewart, T. N., et al. (2016) · Orthopedics · doi:10.3928/01477447-20161108-05 · Cited by 9
Otten, M. R., Kildow, B. J., Sayles, H. R., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.046 · Cited by 8
Aiyer, A. A., Raikin, S. M., & Parvizi, J. (2019) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/1071100719852356 · Cited by 7
Leopold, S. S. (2013) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3330-y · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schwarz, E. M. et al. Adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bone cement: concerns with current use and research to make it work. J. Orthop. Res. 39, 227–239 (2021). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cui, B., Wen, M., Cai, Z., Si, Y., Liu, F., Zheng, Y., Zhang, C., & Jia, Z. (2025) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202418092 · Cited by 31
Li, Y., Li, J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, Q., Wu, Y., Huang, J., Pang, K., Zhou, Y., Xiao, T., Wu, Z., et al. (2025) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122762 · Cited by 25
Wu, Y., Cai, Z., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Liao, L., & Jia, Z. (2026) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.018 · Cited by 7
“In orthopedics, implant-centered infections pose arduous clinical challenges such as persistent inflammation and compromised osseoin-tegration, often culminating in implantation failure [1,27].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Masters, E. A., Ricciardi, B. F., Bentley, K. L. D. M., Moriarty, T. F., Schwarz, E. M., & Muthukrishnan, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- AO Foundation (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Schwarz, Edward M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Published
- 2022-02-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 385-400
- ISSN
- 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1534
- PMC
- PMC8852989
- OpenAlex
- W4212885218
- Semantic Scholar
- fea546c64bde2b8b3e8f7ba8b09894e8cabde064
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 213
- Citations by year
- 2026: 190 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 42
- FWCI
- 32.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AO Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (AR069655, AR072000)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR072000, AR069655, P50AR072000, P30AR069655)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- osteomyelitis, skeletal infection, Staphylococcus aureus, implant-associated infection, biofilm, immune evasion, bacterial persistence, host immune response, orthopedic implants
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Osteomyelitis, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Biofilms, Immune Evasion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
