CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 494Psychological and Educational Research StudiesReinforcement Learning in RoboticsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity

Gottlieb, Jacqueline, Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves·2018·Nature Reviews Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In natural behaviour, animals actively interrogate their environments using endogenously generated 'question-and-answer' strategies. However, in laboratory settings participants typically engage with externally imposed stimuli and tasks, and the mechanisms of active sampling remain poorly understood. We review a nascent neuroscientific literature that examines active-sampling policies and their relation to attention and curiosity. We distinguish between information sampling, in which organisms reduce uncertainty relevant to a familiar task, and information search, in which they investigate in an open-ended fashion to discover new tasks. We review evidence that both sampling and search depend on individual preferences over cognitive states, including attitudes towards uncertainty, learning progress and types of information. We propose that, although these preferences are non-instrumental and can on occasion interfere with external goals, they are important heuristics that allow organisms to cope with the high complexity of both sampling and search, and generate curiosity-driven investigations in large, open environments in which rewards are sparse and ex ante unknown.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 128 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Forestier, S. & Oudeyer, P. Y. in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 3965–3972 (IEEE, 2016). · DOI
  2. Forestier, S. & Oudeyer, P. Y. in Proc. 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Soc. 2013–2018 (Cogsci, 2017).
  3. Lopes, M. & Oudeyer, P.-Y. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL) 1–8 (IEEE, 2012). · DOI
  4. Barto, A., Singh, S. & Chenatez, N. in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Dvp. Learn 112–119 (San Diego, CA, 2004).
  5. Schmidhuber, J. in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks 2, 1458–1463 (IEEE, 1991). · DOI
  6. Bellemare, M. et al. in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 Conf. 1471–1479 (NIPS, 2016).
  7. Kulkarni, T. D., Narasimhan, K., Saeedi, A. & Tenenbaum, J. B. in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 Conf. 3675–3683 (NIPS, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 493

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gottlieb, J., & Oudeyer, P.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute (US)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Gottlieb, Jacqueline
ORCID
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-11-05
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
758-770
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
DOI
10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0
OpenAlex
W2899529983
Cited by
494
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 26
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (P30EY019007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
active sampling, curiosity, information sampling, information search, attention, uncertainty, cognitive states, exploration, learning progress, sparse rewards, open environments
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Neurosciences, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review