Improved tools to study astrocytes
Abstract
Astrocytes are a type of glial cell that tile the CNS. They interact with multiple cell types, including neurons, glial cells and blood vessels, and are involved or implicated in brain disorders. Progress has been made in understanding astrocytes, but the field lacks detailed information concerning how they perform their multifarious functions, and how and when they influence the operations of the neural circuits with which they interact. One recognized bottleneck to progress has been the paucity of reliable tools with which to explore astrocytes within the adult vertebrate CNS in vivo. However, improved tools for molecular, genetic, morphological and physiological assessments have been developed recently or have been adapted from their original purposes to study neurons and are now being used to systematically document and interrogate astrocyte biology in vivo. These tools, their uses and limitations, and the insights that they afford are summarized in this Review.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animal models expressing fluorescent proteins in the astrocyte cytosol or membrane through astrocyte-specific transgenesis or viral gene transfer circumvent the limitations of immunohistochemical analysis.
“Animal models expressing fluorescent proteins in the astrocyte cytosol or membrane through astrocyte-specific transgenesis or after gene transfer with viral vectors25 circumvent the limitations of immunohistochemical analysis.”
From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Optogenetics and DREADDs are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases.
“Optogenetics25 and designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs)25 are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases53–55.”
From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 230 · Cited by 298
- Authors
- Yu, X., Nagai, J., & Khakh, B. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Khakh, Baljit S.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 121-138
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- OpenAlex
- W3004545163
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 230
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- astrocytes, glial cells, astrocyte morphology, astrocyte-neuron interaction, brain disorders
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Astrocytes, Electrophysiology, Humans, Neurosciences, Gene Targeting, Calcium Signaling, Gene Expression Profiling, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review