Cited by 298Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Improved tools to study astrocytes

Yu, Xinzhu, Nagai, Jun, Khakh, Baljit S.·2020·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Astrocytes are a type of glial cell that tile the CNS. They interact with multiple cell types, including neurons, glial cells and blood vessels, and are involved or implicated in brain disorders. Progress has been made in understanding astrocytes, but the field lacks detailed information concerning how they perform their multifarious functions, and how and when they influence the operations of the neural circuits with which they interact. One recognized bottleneck to progress has been the paucity of reliable tools with which to explore astrocytes within the adult vertebrate CNS in vivo. However, improved tools for molecular, genetic, morphological and physiological assessments have been developed recently or have been adapted from their original purposes to study neurons and are now being used to systematically document and interrogate astrocyte biology in vivo. These tools, their uses and limitations, and the insights that they afford are summarized in this Review.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-020-0264-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models expressing fluorescent proteins in the astrocyte cytosol or membrane through astrocyte-specific transgenesis or viral gene transfer circumvent the limitations of immunohistochemical analysis.

    “Animal models expressing fluorescent proteins in the astrocyte cytosol or membrane through astrocyte-specific transgenesis or after gene transfer with viral vectors25 circumvent the limitations of immunohistochemical analysis.”
  • Optogenetics and DREADDs are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases.

    “Optogenetics25 and designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs)25 are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases53–55.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 230 · Cited by 298

Authors
Yu, X., Nagai, J., & Khakh, B. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Khakh, Baljit S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2020-02-10
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
121-138
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W3004545163
Cited by
298
References
230
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 30
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
astrocytes, glial cells, astrocyte morphology, astrocyte-neuron interaction, brain disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Electrophysiology, Humans, Neurosciences, Gene Targeting, Calcium Signaling, Gene Expression Profiling, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review