Cited by 2,533Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSpinal Cord Injury Research

Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions

Open access
Escartin, Carole, Galea, Elena, Lakatos, András, O’Callaghan, James P., Petzold, Gabor C., Serrano-Pozo, Alberto, Steinhäuser, Christian, Volterra, Andrea +73 more·2021·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Reactive astrocytes are astrocytes undergoing morphological, molecular, and functional remodeling in response to injury, disease, or infection of the CNS. Although this remodeling was first described over a century ago, uncertainties and controversies remain regarding the contribution of reactive astrocytes to CNS diseases, repair, and aging. It is also unclear whether fixed categories of reactive astrocytes exist and, if so, how to identify them. We point out the shortcomings of binary divisions of reactive astrocytes into good-vs-bad, neurotoxic-vs-neuroprotective or A1-vs-A2. We advocate, instead, that research on reactive astrocytes include assessment of multiple molecular and functional parameters-preferably in vivo-plus multivariate statistics and determination of impact on pathological hallmarks in relevant models. These guidelines may spur the discovery of astrocyte-based biomarkers as well as astrocyte-targeting therapies that abrogate detrimental actions of reactive astrocytes, potentiate their neuro- and glioprotective actions, and restore or augment their homeostatic, modulatory, and defensive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-020-00783-4

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

106 of 139 cited sources checked · 65 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Reactive astrogliosis phenomena such as astrocyte proliferation, scar-border formation, and immune-cell recruitment mainly occur when there is disruption of the blood-brain barrier.

    “these phenomena mainly occur when there is disruption of the blood–brain barrier (Fig. 1a)7.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Sofroniew, M. V. Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 249–263 (2015). source

      The ‘Astrocyte restriction of CNS inflammation’ section describes proliferation, scar-border formation and inflammatory-cell trafficking at sites of CNS damage. The ‘Astrocyte anti-inflammatory mechanisms’ section links newly proliferated scar-forming astrocytes to blood–brain barrier repair after traumatic injury and describes a mechanism by which astrocytes disrupt the barrier and increase leukocyte extravasation. Neither section establishes that these phenomena mainly occur when the blood–brain barrier is disrupted; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Membrane proteins EAAT1 and EAAT2 are not optimal candidates to assess complex astrocyte morphology because they tend to produce widespread and diffuse staining.

    “Membrane proteins such as the glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2 are not optimal candidates to assess complex astrocyte morphology, as they tend to produce widespread and diffuse staining24.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Sosunov, A. A. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of isocortical and hippocampal astrocytes in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 34, 2285–2298 (2014). source

      The section “Astrocyte domain localizations and microheterogeneity among astrocyte types” (page unavailable) reports that EAAT1- and EAAT2-positive processes from neighboring astrocytes penetrate CD44-positive astrocyte domains, supporting a limitation in using these markers to delineate individual cells. It does not say that EAAT1 or EAAT2 staining is generally widespread and diffuse, or explicitly conclude that they are unsuitable for assessing complex morphology. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Astrocytes can exhibit cell-autonomous disturbances, as in astrocytopathies caused by mutated astrocytic genes such as GFAP in Alexander disease, direct viral infections, or toxic substances that specifically damage astrocytes such as ammonium in hepatic encephalopathy.

    “Astrocytes may also exhibit cell-autonomous disturbances8, as happens in astrocytopathies resulting from mutated alleles of astrocytic genes (for example, GFAP in Alexander disease)9, as well as from direct viral infections or exposure to toxic substances that specifically damage astrocytes (for example, ammonium in hepatic encephalopathy)10.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] Verkhratsky, A., Zorec, R. & Parpura, V. Stratification of astrocytes in healthy and diseased brain. Brain Pathol 27, 629–644 (2017). source
    • cites [9] Messing, A., Brenner, M., Feany, M. B., Nedergaard, M. & Goldman, J. E. Alexander disease. J. Neurosci. 32, 5017–5023 (2012). source
    • cites [10] Brusilow, S. W., Koehler, R. C., Traystman, R. J. & Cooper, A. J. Astrocyte glutamine synthetase: importance in hyperammonemic syndromes and potential target for therapy. Neurotherapeutics 7, 452–470 (2010). source
  • Premisecitation

    Astrocytes in the healthy brain are diverse and specialized to perform specific roles in distinct CNS circuits.

    “Transcriptomics has contributed to a fundamental discovery: astrocytes in the healthy brain are diverse and specialized to perform specific roles in distinct CNS circuits14,65.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] Ben Haim, L. & Rowitch, D. H. Functional diversity of astrocytes in neural circuit regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 31–41 (2017). source
    • cites [65] Chai, H. et al. Neural circuit-specialized astrocytes: transcriptomic, proteomic, morphological, and functional evidence. Neuron 95, 531–549.e9 (2017). source
  • Premisecitation

    Aging is associated with pronounced regional differences in astrocyte gene expression in mouse brains.

    “Notably, aging is also associated with pronounced regional differences in astrocyte gene expression in mouse brains90,91.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [90] Boisvert, M. M., Erikson, G. A., Shokhirev, M. N. & Allen, N. J. The aging astrocyte transcriptome from multiple regions of the mouse brain. Cell Rep 22, 269–285 (2018). source
    • cites [91] Clarke, L. E. et al. Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1896–E1905 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GFAP expression is modulated by physiological stimuli such as physical activity, enriched environments, and glucocorticoids, and fluctuates with circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

    “Expression of GFAP is also modulated by physiological stimuli such as physical activity19, exposure to enriched environments19, and glucocorticoids20, and it fluctuates with circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus21.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] Rodríguez, J. J., Terzieva, S., Olabarria, M., Lanza, R. G. & Verkhratsky, A. Enriched environment and physical activity reverse astrogliodegeneration in the hippocampus of AD transgenic mice. Cell Death Dis 4, e678 (2013). source

      The paper reports that voluntary running and enriched environments increased the surface area and volume of GFAP-positive astrocyte profiles in the hippocampus of mice (main text; page not provided). It does not establish that GFAP expression itself changed. The glucocorticoid and circadian-rhythm clauses are attached to other citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] O’Callaghan, J. P., Brinton, R. E. & McEwen, B. S. Glucocorticoids regulate the synthesis of glial fibrillary acidic protein in intact and adrenalectomized rats but do not affect its expression following brain injury. J. Neurochem. 57, 860–869 (1991). source
    • cites [21] Gerics, B., Szalay, F. & Hajós, F. Glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: circadian changes and their seasonal dependence. J. Anat. 209, 231–237 (2006). Early demonstration that GFAP is regulated in a physiological context. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The degree of GFAP upregulation in reactive astrocytes often parallels the severity of injury, but this correlation is not always proportional, perhaps due to regional differences of astrocytes including basal GFAP content.

    “However, while the degree of GFAP upregulation in reactive astrocytes often parallels the severity of the injury6, this correlation is not always proportional, perhaps due to regional differences of astrocytes, including basal GFAP content13,14.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] Escartin, C., Guillemaud, O. & Carrillo-de Sauvage, M. A. Questions and (some) answers on reactive astrocytes. Glia 67, 2221–2247 (2019). source

      The passages available from our copy are repository metadata and navigation text, not the paper’s discussion; they have no section or page labels. Searches for GFAP upregulation, injury severity, regional differences, and basal GFAP content returned no passage addressing the claim, so it cannot be assessed from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] Griemsmann, S. et al. Characterization of panglial gap junction networks in the thalamus, neocortex, and hippocampus reveals a unique population of glial cells. Cereb. Cortex 25, 3420–3433 (2015). source
    • cites [14] Ben Haim, L. & Rowitch, D. H. Functional diversity of astrocytes in neural circuit regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 31–41 (2017). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dye-filling methods can visualize whole astrocytes in mice and in human brain samples from surgical resections.

    “Further, dye-filling methods can be used to visualize whole astrocytes in mice23, as well as in human brain samples from surgical resections (Fig. 1b)24.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Wilhelmsson, U. et al. Redefining the concept of reactive astrocytes as cells that remain within their unique domains upon reaction to injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17513–17518 (2006). The complete visualization of astrocytes using whole-cell filling techniques revealed that reactive astrocytes display subtle morphological changes and remain in their 3D territorial domain, highlighting that GFAP immunostaining overestimates the true degree of astrocyte hypertrophy. source
    • cites [24] Sosunov, A. A. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of isocortical and hippocampal astrocytes in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 34, 2285–2298 (2014). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GFAP is expressed by progenitor cells and its expression depends on developmental stages.

    “GFAP is also expressed by progenitor cells15 and its expression depends on developmental stages16,17.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] Kriegstein, A. & Alvarez-Buylla, A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 149–184 (2009). source
    • cites [16] Cahoy, J. D. et al. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J. Neurosci. 28, 264–278 (2008). This study represented a technical and conceptual breakthrough in the neurosciences as the first unbiased classification of brain cell populations based on transcriptomic profiles using early microarray analyses. The resulting transcriptomes are a powerful tool to gain insight into novel brain cell functions. More recently, the classification of brain cells has been further refined and enriched by sc/snRNAs source

      The citation to this paper is attached to the developmental-stage part of the sentence, not the progenitor-cell part. The section on gene expression changes during astrocyte and oligodendrocyte development compares developmental stages, and the Aldh1L1 marker section discusses GFAP, but neither passage says that GFAP expression changes with developmental stage. Searches for GFAP at P1, P7, and P17 found no decisive passage. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Roybon, L. et al. Human stem cell-derived spinal cord astrocytes with defined mature or reactive phenotypes. Cell Rep 4, 1035–1048 (2013). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Astrocytes undergo distinct morphological changes other than hypertrophy in pathological contexts, including elongation, process extension toward injury site, and some 3D domain overlap.

    “Thorough visualization is necessary because astrocytes undergo distinct morphological changes other than hypertrophy in pathological contexts, including elongation, process extension toward injury site, and some three-dimensional (3D) domain overlap26.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Schiweck, J., Eickholt, B. J. & Murk, K. Important shapeshifter: mechanisms allowing astrocytes to respond to the changing nervous system during development, injury and disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 261 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased GFAP immunoreactivity largely reflects changes in the astrocytic cytoskeleton and tends to exaggerate the degree of hypertrophy because, except for scar-border astrocytes, the volume accessed by reactive astrocytes does not change, as they remain in their territorial domains.

    “Increased GFAP immunoreactivity largely reflects changes in the astrocytic cytoskeleton and tends to exaggerate the degree of hypertrophy because, with the exception of scar-border astrocytes, the volume accessed by reactive astrocytes does not change, as they remain in their territorial domains23.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Wilhelmsson, U. et al. Redefining the concept of reactive astrocytes as cells that remain within their unique domains upon reaction to injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17513–17518 (2006). The complete visualization of astrocytes using whole-cell filling techniques revealed that reactive astrocytes display subtle morphological changes and remain in their 3D territorial domain, highlighting that GFAP immunostaining overestimates the true degree of astrocyte hypertrophy. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Expression of some astrocyte proteins may change in reactive astrocytes, and some might be expressed by other cell types in specific brain regions.

    “In addition, the expression of some of these proteins may change in reactive astrocytes22 (Table 1), and some might be expressed by other cell types in specific brain regions13.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Serrano-Pozo, A., Gómez-Isla, T., Growdon, J. H., Frosch, M. P. & Hyman, B. T. A phenotypic change but not proliferation underlies glial responses in Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Pathol. 182, 2332–2344 (2013). source
    • cites [13] Griemsmann, S. et al. Characterization of panglial gap junction networks in the thalamus, neocortex, and hippocampus reveals a unique population of glial cells. Cereb. Cortex 25, 3420–3433 (2015). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Transcriptomic profiling shows that reactive astrocytes adopt distinct molecular states in different disease models, in different CNS regions, and in brain tumors.

    “Such transcriptomic profiling specifically shows that reactive astrocytes adopt distinct molecular states in different disease models48,66–70, in different CNS regions70, and in brain tumors71.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [48] Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016). source

      The Extended Data compare RNA-seq profiles of spinal-cord-injury reactive astrocytes with previously reported forebrain stroke-reactive astrocytes; only 58.5% of the top elevated forebrain genes were also significantly elevated after spinal cord injury. This supports molecular differences between those contexts, but disease model and CNS region change together, so the paper does not establish distinct states attributable to region independently. The brain-tumor clause is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [66] Zamanian, J. L. et al. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J. Neurosci. 32, 6391–6410 (2012). First evidence for molecular heterogeneity of reactive astrocytes using microarray-based transcriptomics of acutely isolated astrocytes from mouse models of ischemia and septic shock. Studies in virtually all models of CNS diseases followed. source
    • cites [67] Orre, M. et al. Isolation of glia from Alzheimer’s mice reveals inflammation and dysfunction. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 2746–2760 (2014). source
    • cites [68] Sirko, S. et al. Astrocyte reactivity after brain injury-: The role of galectins 1 and 3. Glia 63, 2340–2361 (2015). source

      The Results section, “Injury-Induced Changes of Gene Expression in the Cerebral Cortex GM Astrocytes” (page unavailable), reports transcriptomic differences between reactive and nonreactive astrocytes after cortical injury. The Introduction describes a stab-wound model and comparison with neural stem cells, not reactive astrocytes across different disease models or CNS regions. The brain-tumor clause is attached to citation 71, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [69] Diaz-Castro, B., Gangwani, M. R., Yu, X., Coppola, G. & Khakh, B. S. Astrocyte molecular signatures in Huntington’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaaw8546 (2019). source
    • cites [70] Itoh, N. et al. Cell-specific and region-specific transcriptomics in the multiple sclerosis model: Focus on astrocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E302–E309 (2018). source

      The Results section, “Regional Differences in Astrocyte-Specific Gene Expression During EAE” (page unavailable), reports distinct astrocyte gene-expression patterns across CNS regions during EAE. This paper studies one disease model, so it does not itself establish differences between disease models. The brain-tumor clause is attached to citation 71, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [71] John Lin, C. C. et al. Identification of diverse astrocyte populations and their malignant analogs. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 396–405 (2017). source

      The Results section on malignant glioma reports distinct expression-profile correlations between astrocyte subpopulations and glioblastoma subtypes, and the Discussion describes molecularly distinct populations emerging during tumor progression. This supports the brain-tumor portion attached to this citation, but the paper does not establish that reactive astrocytes adopt those states; it studies astrocyte subpopulations and their malignant glioma analogs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Manipulation of reactive astrocytes has resulted in improved outcomes, worse outcomes, and no change in mouse models of AD and MS.

    “For example, the manipulation of reactive astrocytes has resulted in improved outcomes38,42,43, worse35 outcomes, and no change44 in mouse models of AD and MS40,45,46.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [38] Furman, J. L. et al. Targeting astrocytes ameliorates neurologic changes in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 32, 16129–16140 (2012). source
    • cites [42] Ceyzériat, K. et al. Modulation of astrocyte reactivity improves functional deficits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6, 104 (2018). source
    • cites [43] Reichenbach, N. et al. Inhibition of Stat3-mediated astrogliosis ameliorates pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease model. EMBO Mol. Med. 11, e9665 (2019). source
    • cites [35] Kraft, A. W. et al. Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice. FASEB J. 27, 187–198 (2013). source
    • cites [44] Kamphuis, W. et al. GFAP and vimentin deficiency alters gene expression in astrocytes and microglia in wild-type mice and changes the transcriptional response of reactive glia in mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 63, 1036–1056 (2015). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the study of AD transgenic and wild-type mice, homeostatic astrocytes were predominant in healthy mice, whereas disease-associated astrocytes were unique to AD mice.

    “In this study, ‘homeostatic astrocytes’ were predominant in healthy mice, whereas ‘disease-associated astrocytes’ were unique to AD mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] Habib, N. et al. Disease-associated astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 701–706 (2020). source

      The paper reports a homeostatic Gfap-low state in wild-type mice and a disease-associated astrocyte state observed only in AD mice in its initial comparison (Abstract; no page given). But its age-series analysis also finds DAA-like cells in older wild-type mice, so the unqualified claim that they were unique to AD mice overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Functions lost or altered in reactive astrocytes include neurotransmitter and ion buffering in mouse HD models, communication via gap junctions in the sclerotic hippocampus of patients with epilepsy, phagocytic clearance of dystrophic neurites, and metabolic coupling by glycolysis-derived d-serine and lactate in mouse AD models.

    “Functions lost or altered in reactive astrocytes include neurotransmitter and ion buffering in mouse HD models58, communication via gap junctions in the sclerotic hippocampus of patients with epilepsy59, phagocytic clearance of dystrophic neurites60, and metabolic coupling by glycolysis-derived d-serine61 and lactate62 in mouse AD models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [58] Tong, X. et al. Astrocyte Kir4.1 ion channel deficits contribute to neuronal dysfunction in Huntington’s disease model mice. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 694–703 (2014). Demonstration with targeted molecular manipulations that loss of astrocyte homeostatic functions contributes to HD pathogenesis. source

      The Discussion reports reduced GLT-1 and Kir4.1 expression and impaired extracellular potassium maintenance in HD mouse models, supporting altered neurotransmitter and ion buffering. But it says these early functional changes occurred without astrogliosis; the Results likewise found little or no striatal astrogliosis at symptomatic ages. This source therefore does not support describing the affected astrocytes as reactive. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [59] Bedner, P. et al. Astrocyte uncoupling as a cause of human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 138, 1208–1222 (2015). source
    • cites [60] Gomez-Arboledas, A. et al. Phagocytic clearance of presynaptic dystrophies by reactive astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 66, 637–653 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    hiPSC-derived astrocytes are amenable to study responses to viral infection and to specific stimuli.

    “hiPSC-derived astrocytes are also amenable to study responses to viral infection83 and to specific stimuli84.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [83] Ledur, P. F. et al. Zika virus infection leads to mitochondrial failure, oxidative stress and DNA damage in human iPSC-derived astrocytes. Sci. Rep. 10, 1218 (2020). source
    • cites [84] Perriot, S. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocytes are differentially activated by multiple sclerosis-associated cytokines. Stem Cell Reports 11, 1199–1210 (2018). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies in rodents document region-dependent and often contradictory changes in aging astrocytes, such as an increase in cellular volume and overlap of astrocyte processes, but also atrophy, increase in GFAP content, or even a reduction in the number of GFAP+ and GS+ astrocytes.

    “Studies in rodents document region-dependent and often contradictory changes in aging astrocytes, such as an increase in cellular volume and overlap of astrocyte processes, but also atrophy, increase in GFAP content, or even a reduction in the number of GFAP+ and GS+ astrocytes87–89.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [87] Rodríguez, J. J. et al. Complex and region-specific changes in astroglial markers in the aging brain. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 15–23 (2014). source
    • cites [88] Cerbai, F. et al. The neuron-astrocyte-microglia triad in normal brain ageing and in a model of neuroinflammation in the rat hippocampus. PLoS One 7, e45250 (2012). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [89] O’Callaghan, J. P. & Miller, D. B. The concentration of glial fibrillary acidic protein increases with age in the mouse and rat brain. Neurobiol. Aging 12, 171–174 (1991). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Astrocytes generated from hiPSC derived from fibroblasts of patients with CNS diseases show pathological phenotypes, including dysregulation of lipid metabolism, alteration in extracellular vesicles, reduced autophagy, or altered STAT3 signaling.

    “Interestingly, astrocytes generated from hiPSC derived from fibroblasts obtained from patients with CNS diseases (usually with a genetic mutation causative of disease or a risk polymorphism) show pathological phenotypes, including dysregulation of lipid metabolism11, alteration in the contents of the extracellular vesicles released by astrocytes80, reduced autophagy81, or altered STAT3 signaling82”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Lin, Y. T. et al. APOE4 causes widespread molecular and cellular alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes in human iPSC-derived brain cell types. Neuron 98, 1141–1154.e7 (2018). Technically improved generation of hiPSC-derived astrocytes demonstrates that astrocytes harboring a genetic risk factor for AD are diseased astrocytes that may further exacerbate ongoing pathology. source
    • cites [80] Varcianna, A. et al. Micro-RNAs secreted through astrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles cause neuronal network degeneration in C9orf72 ALS. EBioMedicine 40, 626–635 (2019). source

      The Results section (“MicroRNAs regulating axonal maintenance are selectively dysregulated in C9 patient ADEVs”; page unavailable) reports altered miRNA cargo in extracellular vesicles released by C9orf72-ALS patient astrocytes, supporting the point attached to this citation. However, the Materials and methods section (“Conversion of skin fibroblasts to induced neural progenitor cells”; page unavailable) describes direct conversion of patient fibroblasts to neural progenitor cells and then astrocytes, not generation through hiPSCs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [81] di Domenico, A. et al. Patient-specific iPSC-derived astrocytes contribute to non-cell-autonomous neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cell Reports 12, 213–229 (2019). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Astrocyte Ca2+ dynamics and network responses become aberrant in mouse models of HD, AD, and ALS, possibly contributing to cognitive impairment and neuropathology.

    “Astrocyte Ca2+ dynamics and network responses become aberrant in mouse models of HD53, AD54, and ALS55, possibly contributing to cognitive impairment and neuropathology43,53,56.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [53] Jiang, R., Diaz-Castro, B., Looger, L. L. & Khakh, B. S. Dysfunctional calcium and glutamate signaling in striatal astrocytes from Huntington’s disease model mice. J. Neurosci. 36, 3453–3470 (2016). source

      The Significance Statement (p. 2) and Discussion (p. 16) support aberrant astrocyte Ca2+ signaling and altered circuit engagement in HD model mice. The paper suggests these changes may contribute to altered striatal function, but it does not establish a contribution to cognitive impairment; the Discussion (p. 17) says a mechanism linking the cellular findings to HD symptoms remains unresolved. The AD and ALS portions of the citing sentence have separate citations and are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Kuchibhotla, K. V., Lattarulo, C. R., Hyman, B. T. & Bacskai, B. J. Synchronous hyperactivity and intercellular calcium waves in astrocytes in Alzheimer mice. Science 323, 1211–1215 (2009). source
    • cites [55] Agarwal, A. et al. Transient opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces microdomain calcium transients in astrocyte processes. Neuron 93, 587–605.e7 (2017). Technically refined application of Ca2+ imaging approaches and machine learning unraveled dysregulation of Ca2+ responses in a mouse model of ALS. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Transcriptomic studies suggested complex functional changes in reactive astrocytes, including novel regenerative functions, proliferation, neural stem cell potential, and loss of homeostatic functions.

    “These studies also suggested complex functional changes in reactive astrocytes, including novel regenerative functions70, proliferation, and neural stem cell potential68, as well as loss of homeostatic functions66.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [70] Itoh, N. et al. Cell-specific and region-specific transcriptomics in the multiple sclerosis model: Focus on astrocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E302–E309 (2018). source
    • cites [68] Sirko, S. et al. Astrocyte reactivity after brain injury-: The role of galectins 1 and 3. Glia 63, 2340–2361 (2015). source
    • cites [66] Zamanian, J. L. et al. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J. Neurosci. 32, 6391–6410 (2012). First evidence for molecular heterogeneity of reactive astrocytes using microarray-based transcriptomics of acutely isolated astrocytes from mouse models of ischemia and septic shock. Studies in virtually all models of CNS diseases followed. source

      Citation 66 is attached to the claim that reactive astrocytes lose homeostatic functions. The Discussion describes extensive gene-expression changes and identifies transporters and channels involved in homeostasis, but does not say that homeostatic functions are lost. Searches for loss of homeostatic function and down-regulation of homeostatic genes found no passage establishing that point. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activation of STAT3-dependent transcription is beneficial in neonatal white matter injury, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and motor neuron injury, but detrimental in AD models.

    “For example, activation of STAT3-dependent transcription is beneficial in neonatal white matter injury47, traumatic brain injury30, spinal cord injury48,49, and motor neuron injury50, but detrimental in AD models42,43.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [47] Nobuta, H. et al. STAT3-mediated astrogliosis protects myelin development in neonatal brain injury. Ann. Neurol. 72, 750–765 (2012). source
    • cites [30] Levine, J. et al. Traumatically injured astrocytes release a proteomic signature modulated by STAT3-dependent cell survival. Glia 64, 668–694 (2016). source

      The Results section ('Acute STAT3 activation is important for cell integrity and apoptosis after astrocyte injury'; page unavailable) reports that STAT3-deficient astrocytes survived mechanical stretching less well than controls. The paper also reports protective effects after spinal cord injury, but the cited evidence does not establish a benefit of STAT3-dependent transcription in traumatic brain injury specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [48] Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016). source
    • cites [49] Herrmann, J. E. et al. STAT3 is a critical regulator of astrogliosis and scar formation after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 7231–7243 (2008). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Responses of reactive astrocytes may be maladaptive and result in malfunctional astrocytes, which, in addition to losing homeostatic functions, may gain detrimental functions, thus exacerbating ongoing pathology.

    “Lastly, responses of reactive astrocytes may be maladaptive and result in malfunctional astrocytes, which, in addition to losing homeostatic functions, may also gain detrimental functions, thus exacerbating ongoing pathology6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Escartin, C., Guillemaud, O. & Carrillo-de Sauvage, M. A. Questions and (some) answers on reactive astrocytes. Glia 67, 2221–2247 (2019). source

      The indexed passages are a HAL repository listing and site navigation, with no section or page of the paper’s substantive text. Searches for maladaptive responses, loss of homeostatic functions, detrimental functions, and worsening pathology returned no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    hiPSC-derived astrocytes are rapidly becoming commonplace in basic research and therapy development.

    “are rapidly becoming commonplace in basic research11,82 and therapy development109”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Lin, Y. T. et al. APOE4 causes widespread molecular and cellular alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes in human iPSC-derived brain cell types. Neuron 98, 1141–1154.e7 (2018). Technically improved generation of hiPSC-derived astrocytes demonstrates that astrocytes harboring a genetic risk factor for AD are diseased astrocytes that may further exacerbate ongoing pathology. source
    • cites [82] Tyzack, G. E. et al. A neuroprotective astrocyte state is induced by neuronal signal EphB1 but fails in ALS models. Nat. Commun. 8, 1164 (2017). source

      The Methods describe experiments with hiPSC-derived astrocytes, and the Discussion says human iPSC models can help identify astrocytic targets for potential treatment. This supports their relevance to therapy development, but the paper does not establish that their use is rapidly becoming commonplace. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [109] Colombo, E. et al. Siponimod (BAF312) activates Nrf2 while hampering NFκB in human astrocytes, and protects from astrocyte-induced neurodegeneration. Front. Immunol. 11, 635 (2020). source

      The Results section (“Generation and Characterization of Human iAstrocytes”; page unavailable) shows that the authors generated hiPSC-derived astrocytes as a research model, and the Methods show their use in testing siponimod. This provides an example relevant to basic research and therapy investigation, but the paper does not establish that such use is rapidly becoming commonplace. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    hiPSC-derived astrocytes can be generated with a fast protocol in 2D layers or integrated in 3D systems such as spheroids and organoids.

    “hiPSC-derived astrocytes, which can be generated with a fast protocol in 2D layers104 or integrated in 3D systems such as spheroids and organoids105–108”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [104] Tchieu, J. et al. NFIA is a gliogenic switch enabling rapid derivation of functional human astrocytes from pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 267–275 (2019). source
    • cites [105] Sloan, S. A. et al. Human astrocyte maturation captured in 3D cerebral cortical spheroids derived from pluripotent stem cells. Neuron 95, 779–790.e6 (2017). source
    • cites [106] Lancaster, M. A. et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373–379 (2013). source

      The Results section (‘Generation of cerebral organoids’; page unavailable) reports 3D cerebral organoids generated from human induced pluripotent stem cells. It does not report hiPSC-derived astrocytes being integrated into those organoids or into spheroids. The fast 2D protocol is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [107] Quadrato, G. et al. Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organoids. Nature 545, 48–53 (2017). source
    • cites [108] Giandomenico, S. L. et al. Cerebral organoids at the air-liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 669–679 (2019). source

      The Results section (‘Air-liquid interface culture of cerebral organoids leads to improved survival and maturation’; page unavailable) reports astrocytes in cerebral organoids, supporting the 3D-organoid part of the cited claim. The Methods section (‘Human pluripotent stem cell culture and genome editing’; page unavailable) specifies that the organoids were generated from human embryonic stem cells, not hiPSCs. The fast 2D protocol is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emerging reactive-astrocyte biomarkers are either measured in blood or cerebrospinal fluid (for example, YKL-40) or used for brain imaging, such as MAO-B-based positron emission tomography (PET).

    “Emerging reactive-astrocyte biomarkers are either measured in blood or cerebrospinal fluid (for example, YKL-40)115 or used for brain imaging, such as MAO-B-based positron emission tomography (PET)116”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [115] Craig-Schapiro, R. et al. YKL-40: a novel prognostic fluid biomarker for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 903–912 (2010). source
    • cites [116] Carter, S. F. et al. Evidence for astrocytosis in prodromal Alzheimer disease provided by 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl: a multitracer PET paradigm combining 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-FDG. J. Nucl. Med. 53, 37–46 (2012). Non-invasive imaging of reactive astrocytes in human patients. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Optogenetics and DREADDs are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases.

    “Optogenetics25 and designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs)25 are potential tools to manipulate reactive astrocytes or to restore their aberrant Ca2+ signaling observed in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases53–55.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [25] Yu, X., Nagai, J. & Khakh, B. S. Improved tools to study astrocytes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 121–138 (2020). source
    • cites [53] Jiang, R., Diaz-Castro, B., Looger, L. L. & Khakh, B. S. Dysfunctional calcium and glutamate signaling in striatal astrocytes from Huntington’s disease model mice. J. Neurosci. 36, 3453–3470 (2016). source
    • cites [54] Kuchibhotla, K. V., Lattarulo, C. R., Hyman, B. T. & Bacskai, B. J. Synchronous hyperactivity and intercellular calcium waves in astrocytes in Alzheimer mice. Science 323, 1211–1215 (2009). source
    • cites [55] Agarwal, A. et al. Transient opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces microdomain calcium transients in astrocyte processes. Neuron 93, 587–605.e7 (2017). Technically refined application of Ca2+ imaging approaches and machine learning unraveled dysregulation of Ca2+ responses in a mouse model of ALS. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Diversity within astrocyte populations from mouse models may be dissected by combining FACS and cell-surface markers identified in screens.

    “Alternatively, the diversity within astrocyte populations from mouse models may be dissected out by combining fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and cell-surface markers identified in screens71.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] John Lin, C. C. et al. Identification of diverse astrocyte populations and their malignant analogs. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 396–405 (2017). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Immunohistochemical staining for cytosolic enzymes such as ALDH1L1, ALDOC, GS, and S100B allows visualization of the somata and proximal processes of astrocytes, although these markers fail to reveal small processes.

    “Immunohistochemical staining for cytosolic enzymes such as ALDH1L1, ALDOC, GS, and S100B allow the visualization of the somata and proximal processes of astrocytes, although, like GFAP, these markers fail to reveal small processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In the healthy mouse brain, hippocampal astrocytes have a higher GFAP content than cortical, thalamic, or striatal astrocytes, but this does not make hippocampal astrocytes more reactive.

    “In the healthy mouse brain, hippocampal astrocytes have a higher GFAP content than cortical, thalamic, or striatal astrocytes; this, however, does not make hippocampal astrocytes more reactive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There are discrepancies between observed GFAP mRNA and protein levels, perhaps due to differential regulation of translation, post-translational modifications, protein half-life, and antibody epitope accessibility.

    “Finally, there are discrepancies between observed GFAP mRNA and protein levels, perhaps due to differential regulation of translation, post-translational modifications, protein half-life, and antibody epitope accessibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Astrocyte reactivity is secondary to an extrinsic signal, may evolve with time, and in many situations is reversible.

    “By definition, astrocyte reactivity is secondary to an extrinsic signal, may evolve with time, and, in many situations, is reversible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Numerous mixed scenarios of malfunctional and resilient astrocytes plausibly exist, with multidirectional transitions among them.

    “Numerous mixed scenarios of malfunctional and resilient astrocytes plausibly exist, with multidirectional transitions among them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GFAP upregulation and hypertrophy are useful but insufficient markers of astrocyte reactivity that need to be complemented by additional markers.

    “In summary, GFAP upregulation and hypertrophy are useful but insufficient markers of astrocyte reactivity that need to be complemented by additional markers (Table 1 and Box 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Isolation protocols may not always be optimal for astrocytes, resulting in low numbers of cells or nuclei being sequenced, and some highly relevant but weakly expressed transcripts may be overlooked, particularly in snRNAseq.

    “Notably, isolation protocols may not always be optimal for astrocytes, resulting in low numbers of cells or nuclei being sequenced, and some highly relevant but weakly expressed transcripts, such as transcription factors and plasma-membrane receptors, may be overlooked, particularly in snRNAseq.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Generation of astrocytes from neural stem cells is inherently difficult, and derivation and culture conditions have not yet been standardized, leading to diversity of clone phenotypes.

    “In addition, generation of astrocytes from neural stem cells is inherently difficult, and derivation and culture conditions have not yet been standardized, leading to diversity of clone phenotypes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vague and binary terms such as neuroprotective or neurotoxic are best avoided in describing astrocyte phenotypes as they are too simplistic to be meaningful, unless supported by specific molecular mechanisms and direct causative experimental evidence.

    “In addition, vague and binary terms such as ‘neuroprotective’ or ‘neurotoxic’ are best avoided in describing astrocyte phenotypes as they are too simplistic to be meaningful, unless they are suppor ted by specific molecular mechanisms and direct causative experi mental evidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although astrocytes appear more resistant than neurons to degeneration and death, loss of primary and secondary astrocyte branches has been reported in mouse models of AD and ALS, and in patients with multiple sclerosis.

    “In addition, although astrocytes appear to be more resistant than neurons to degeneration and death, loss of primary and secondary astrocyte branches has been reported in mouse models of AD27 and ALS18, and in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)28.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] Olabarria, M., Noristani, H. N., Verkhratsky, A. & Rodríguez, J. J. Concomitant astroglial atrophy and astrogliosis in a triple transgenic animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 58, 831–838 (2010). source
    • cites [18] Rossi, D. et al. Focal degeneration of astrocytes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Death Differ. 15, 1691–1700 (2008). source
    • cites [28] Black, J. A., Newcombe, J. & Waxman, S. G. Astrocytes within multiple sclerosis lesions upregulate sodium channel Nav1.5. Brain 133, 835–846 (2010). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    STAT3-mediated transcriptional programs may contribute to malfunctional astrocyte states in AD models and to resilient states in other conditions.

    “That is, STAT3-mediated transcriptional programs may contribute to malfunctional astrocyte states in AD models and to resilient states in other conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The term homeostatic astrocytes implies the unproven assumption that other transcriptional astrocyte clusters are dys-homeostatic, while they may be successful homeostasis-preserving adaptations to disease.

    “In addition, the term ‘homeostatic astrocytes’ implies the unproven assumption that other transcriptional astrocyte clusters are dys-homeostatic, while they may be successful homeostasis-preserving adaptations to disease.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Healthy brain aging is not pathological and may be defined as an adaptive evolution of global cell physiology over time.

    “Healthy brain aging is not pathological and may be defined as an adaptive evolution of global cell physiology over time85.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] Rodríguez-Arellano, J. J., Parpura, V., Zorec, R. & Verkhratsky, A. Astrocytes in physiological aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 323, 170–182 (2016). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    New names are needed to capture the variety of reactive astrocytes, but current knowledge does not yet allow the objective categorizing of reactive astrocytes.

    “Arguably, new names are needed to capture the variety of reactive astrocytes, but current knowledge does not yet allow the objective categorizing of reactive astrocytes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The morphological appearance of astrocytes does not correlate with functional phenotypes or with their impact on other cell types.

    “An important conclusion drawn from these studies is that the morphological appearance of astrocytes does not correlate with functional phenotypes or with their impact on other cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Expression in full or in part of a predetermined correlative signature of molecular markers is not, on its own, sufficient to define a functional phenotype of reactive astrocyte.

    “We stress that the expression in full or in part of a predetermined correlative signature of molecular markers is not, on its own, sufficient to define a functional phenotype of reactive astrocyte.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Molecular signatures based on expression of genes or proteins need to be validated by assessing specific astrocyte functions, since post-transcriptional and post-translational events critically shape functional outcomes.

    “Importantly, molecular signatures based on the expression of genes or proteins need to be validated by assessing specific astrocyte functions (Table 2), since post-transcriptional and post-translational events critically shape functional outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Acute metabolic damage with the mitochondrial toxin MPTP does not replicate chronic Parkinson's disease.

    “Acute metabolic damage with the mitochondrial toxin MPTP does not replicate chronic Parkinson’s disease (PD), to cite another example of in vivo inappropriate modelling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Astrocytes are essentially post-mitotic cells that rarely divide in healthy tissue.

    “which are essentially post-mitotic cells that rarely divide in healthy tissue.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a scarcity of disease-modifying treatments for chronic diseases and acute injuries of the CNS.

    “Given the scarcity of disease-modifying treatments for chronic diseases and acute injuries of the CNS”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are no therapies purposely designed against astrocyte-specific targets in clinical practice.

    “there are no therapies purposely designed against astrocyte-specific targets in clinical practice”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AD neuropathological changes (ADNC) are accompanied by a dramatic loss of synapses and neurons, as well as prominent morphological and functional changes of glial cells, collectively termed reactive gliosis.

    “These AD neuropathological changes (ADNC) are accompanied by a dramatic loss of synapses and neurons, as well as prominent morphological and functional changes of glial cells, collectively termed reactive gliosis1.”

    From Astrocyte transcriptomic changes along the spatiotemporal progression of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The paper’s “Morphology revisited” section describes changes in astrocyte branches in AD mouse models, and “From morphology to functional studies” describes altered reactive-astrocyte functions in AD models. Its discussion of gliosis also supports the general terminology. The cited passages do not establish the claimed dramatic loss of synapses and neurons accompanying AD neuropathological changes; pages are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Consensus genes upregulated or downregulated in reactive astrocytes differ between control and Ts21 astrocytes (**** p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test).

    “( B and C ) Split gene expression violin plots of control (green) and Ts21 (purple) astrocytes for consensus genes upregulated (B) or downregulated (C) in reactive astrocytes (58) (**** p&lt;0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test).”

    From Molecular and cellular processes disrupted in the early postnatal Down syndrome prefrontal cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    In “Transcriptomics and A1–A2 classification” (page unavailable), the source discusses reactive-astrocyte gene signatures and transcripts upregulated in some conditions. It does not identify the cited consensus sets of both upregulated and downregulated genes. The control–Ts21 comparison and Wilcoxon result are presented as the citing paper’s own figure analysis, not as findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reactive astrocytes exhibit hypertrophic characteristics with thick and long processes and increased expression level of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).

    “The reactive astrocytes exhibit hypertrophic characteristics with thick and long processes and increased expression level of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; Liddelow and Barres, 2017;Escartin et al., 2021).”

    From Cell Adhesion Molecule Protocadherin-γC5 Ameliorates Aβ Plaque Pathogenesis by Modulating Astrocyte Function in Alzheimer's Disease (2025) · cites this paper as Escartin et al., 2021

    The “GFAP as a marker” section says GFAP upregulation is prominent in many reactive astrocytes, but not all. “Morphology revisited” describes elongation and process extension in pathological contexts, yet cautions that GFAP staining can exaggerate hypertrophy and that cytoskeletal changes do not necessarily mean true hypertrophy. The source therefore does not support presenting thick, long processes and increased GFAP as characteristics of reactive astrocytes generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglial activation or inflammatory insults induce astrocytes into a reactive state, which can have both neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects.

    “Microglial activation or inflammatory insults induce astrocytes into a reactive state, which can have both neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects [17, 183–185].”
  • Studies evaluating astrocyte state upon NLRP3 inflammasome activation based on the binary "A1/A2" astrocyte description do not fully capture the diversity of astrocyte states and phenotypes in different contexts.

    “However, these studies evaluated astrocyte state upon NLRP3 inflammasome activation based on the binary “A1/A2” astrocyte description, which does not fully capture the diversity of astrocyte states and phenotypes in different contexts [183].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Achucarro, N. Some pathological findings in the neuroglia and in the ganglion cells of the cortex in senile conditions. Bull. Gov. Hosp. Insane 2, 81–90 (1910).
  2. Del Río-Hortega, P. & Penfield, W. G. Cerebral cicatrix: The reaction of neuroglia and microglia to brain wounds. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 41, 278–303 (1927).
  3. Ramon y Cajal, S. Contribución al conocimiento de la neuroglía del cerebro humano. Trabajos del Laboratorio de Investigaciones Biológicas de la Universidad de Madrid 11, 255–315 (1913).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escartin, C., Galea, E., Lakatos, A., O’Callaghan, J. P., Petzold, G. C., Serrano-Pozo, A., Steinhäuser, C., Volterra, A., Carmignoto, G., Agarwal, A., Allen, N. J., Araque, A., Barbeito, L., Barzilai, A., Bergles, D. E., Bonvento, G., Butt, A. M., Chen, W.-T., Cohen-Salmon, M., Cunningham, C., Deneen, B., De Strooper, B., Díaz-Castro, B., Farina, C., Freeman, M., Gallo, V., Goldman, J. E., Goldman, S. A., Götz, M., Gutiérrez, A., Haydon, P. G., Heiland, D. H., Hol, E. M., Holt, M. G., Iino, M., Kastanenka, K. V., Kettenmann, H., Khakh, B. S., Koizumi, S., Lee, C. J., Liddelow, S. A., MacVicar, B. A., Magistretti, P., Messing, A., Mishra, A., Molofsky, A. V., Murai, K. K., Norris, C. M., Okada, S., Oliet, S. H. R., Oliveira, J. F., Panatier, A., Parpura, V., Pekna, M., Pekny, M., Pellerin, L., Perea, G., Pérez-Nievas, B. G., Pfrieger, F. W., Poskanzer, K. E., Quintana, F. J., Ransohoff, R. M., Riquelme-Perez, M., Robel, S., Rose, C. R., Rothstein, J. D., Rouach, N., Rowitch, D. H., Semyanov, A., Sirko, S., Sontheimer, H., Swanson, R. A., Vitorica, J., Wanner, I.-B., Wood, L. B., Wu, J., Zheng, B., Zimmer, E. R., Zorec, R., Sofroniew, M. V., & Verkhratsky, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Institut Pasteur de Montevideo (UY)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Escartin, Carole
  • Galea, Elena
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
312-325
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W3132240972
Cited by
2,533
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 372 · 2025: 467 · 2024: 477 · 2023: 439 · 2022: 419 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 3
FWCI
139.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
reactive astrocytes, central nervous system injury, central nervous system disorders, astrocyte heterogeneity, consensus definition
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Brain Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review