Cited by 155Embodied and Extended CognitionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Forms of prediction in the nervous system

Teufel, Christoph, Fletcher, Paul C.·2020·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The idea that predictions shape how we perceive and comprehend the world has become increasingly influential in the field of systems neuroscience. It also forms an important framework for understanding neuropsychiatric disorders, which are proposed to be the result of disturbances in the mechanisms through which prior information influences perception and belief, leading to the production of suboptimal models of the world. There is a widespread tendency to conceptualize the influence of predictions exclusively in terms of 'top-down' processes, whereby predictions generated in higher-level areas exert their influence on lower-level areas within an information processing hierarchy. However, this excludes from consideration the predictive information embedded in the 'bottom-up' stream of information processing. We describe evidence for the importance of this distinction and argue that it is critical for the development of the predictive processing framework and, ultimately, for an understanding of the perturbations that drive the emergence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-020-0275-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If experiments designed to isolate prior influence show no modulation of neural activity or behavioral outcomes, Bayesian assumptions are undermined.

    “Experiments designed to isolate prior influence (e.g., cue-based probabilistic expectations) that show no such modulation undermine Bayesian assumptions (Teufel and Fletcher 2020).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Teufel and Fletcher 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 160 · Cited by 155

Authors
Teufel, C., & Fletcher, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Teufel, Christoph
  • Fletcher, Paul C.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2020-03-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
231-242
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W3012356156
Cited by
155
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 14
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
prediction, predictive processing, top-down processing, bottom-up processing, prior experience, perception, neuropsychiatric disorders, belief formation
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Brain, Humans, Models, Neurological, Perception, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review