Cited by 576Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Mutant phenotypes for thousands of bacterial genes of unknown function

Open access
Price, Morgan N., Wetmore, Kelly M., Waters, R. Jordan, Callaghan, Mark, Ray, Jayashree, Liu, Hualan, Kuehl, Jennifer V., Melnyk, Ryan A. +14 more·2018·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

One-third of all protein-coding genes from bacterial genomes cannot be annotated with a function. Here, to investigate the functions of these genes, we present genome-wide mutant fitness data from 32 diverse bacteria across dozens of growth conditions. We identified mutant phenotypes for 11,779 protein-coding genes that had not been annotated with a specific function. Many genes could be associated with a specific condition because the gene affected fitness only in that condition, or with another gene in the same bacterium because they had similar mutant phenotypes. Of the poorly annotated genes, 2,316 had associations that have high confidence because they are conserved in other bacteria. By combining these conserved associations with comparative genomics, we identified putative DNA repair proteins; in addition, we propose specific functions for poorly annotated enzymes and transporters and for uncharacterized protein families. Our study demonstrates the scalability of microbial genetics and its utility for improving gene annotations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0124-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent technologies for bacterial phenotyping and phage receptor identification enable predictive modeling.

    “Recent technologies for bacterial phenotyping and phage receptor identification enable predictive modeling [90,151–156]”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [155]

    The section ‘Conserved phenotypes are accurate predictors of protein function’ describes using bacterial mutant phenotypes to predict protein functions, supporting the phenotyping part of the sentence. The cited paper does not address phage receptor identification or its contribution to predictive modeling; the full sentence is therefore only partly supported by this source. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Schnoes, A. M., Brown, S. D., Dodevski, I. & Babbitt, P. C. Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000605 (2009).
  2. Deutschbauer, A. et al. Evidence-based annotation of gene function in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using genome-wide fitness profiling across 121 conditions. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002385 (2011).
  3. Price, M. N. et al. The genetic basis of energy conservation in the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio alaskensis G20. Front Microbiol 5, 577 (2014).
  4. Rubin, B. E. et al. The essential gene set of a photosynthetic organism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E6634-43 (2015).
  5. Hottes, A. K. et al. Bacterial Adaptation through Loss of Function. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003617 (2013).
  6. Thorgersen, M. P. et al. Molybdenum Availability is Key to Nitrate Removal in Contaminated Groundwater Environments. Appl Environ Microbiol AEM.00917-15 (2015). doi:10.1128/AEM.00917-15 · DOI
  7. Kahm, M., Hasenbrink, G., Lichtenberg-Frate, H., Ludwig, J. & Kschischo, M. grofit: Fitting Biological Growth Curves with R. Journal of Statistical Software 33, (2010).
  8. Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9, e112963 (2014).
  9. Tritt, A., Eisen, J. A., Facciotti, M. T. & Darling, A. E. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS One 7, e42304 (2012).
  10. Hunt, M. et al. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16, 294 (2015).
  11. Lerat, E., Daubin, V., Ochman, H. & Moran, N. A. Evolutionary origins of genomic repertoires in bacteria. PLoS Biol 3, e130 (2005).
  12. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010).
  13. Aziz, R. K. et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9, 75 (2008). References
  14. Deutschbauer, A. et al. Evidence-based annotation of gene function in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using genome-wide fitness profiling across 121 conditions. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002385 (2011).
  15. Rubin, B. E. et al. The essential gene set of a photosynthetic organism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E6634-43 (2015).
  16. Kato, J.-I. & Hashimoto, M. Construction of consecutive deletions of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 132 (2007).
  17. Meyer, B. et al. The energy-conserving electron transfer system used by Desulfovibrio alaskensis strain G20 during pyruvate fermentation involves reduction of endogenously formed fumarate and cytoplasmic and membrane- bound complexes, Hdr-Flox and Rnf. Environ. Microbiol. n/a-n/a (2014). doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12405 · DOI
  18. Price, M. N. et al. The genetic basis of energy conservation in the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio alaskensis G20. Front Microbiol 5, 577 (2014).
  19. Rückert, C. et al. Functional genomics and expression analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum fpr2-cysIXHDNYZ gene cluster involved in assimilatory sulphate reduction. BMC Genomics 6, 121 (2005).
  20. Shetty, A., Chen, S., Tocheva, E. I., Jensen, G. J. & Hickey, W. J. Nanopods: a new bacterial structure and mechanism for deployment of outer membrane vesicles. PLoS One 6, e20725 (2011).
  21. Hickey, W. J., Chen, S. & Zhao, J. The phn Island: A New Genomic Island Encoding Catabolism of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Front Microbiol 3, 125 (2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, M. N., Wetmore, K. M., Waters, R. J., Callaghan, M., Ray, J., Liu, H., Kuehl, J. V., Melnyk, R. A., Lamson, J. S., Suh, Y., Carlson, H. K., Esquivel, Z., Sadeeshkumar, H., Chakraborty, R., Zane, G. M., Rubin, B. E., Wall, J. D., Visel, A., Bristow, J., Blow, M. J., Arkin, A. P., & Deutschbauer, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Blow, Matthew J.
  • Arkin, Adam P.
  • Deutschbauer, Adam M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
557
Issue
7706
Pages
503-509
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2804515387
Cited by
576
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • Joint Genome Institute (AC02-05CH11231, DE–AC02–05CH11231)
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od018174-01, DE-AC02–05CH11231)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231)
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR029668, S10RR027303)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (05CH11231, DE-AC02 − 05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231)
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development (DEAC02-05CH11231)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
gene function annotation, gene function prediction, DNA repair proteins, comparative genomics, microbial genetics, transporters
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Proteins, DNA Repair, Genes, Bacterial, Mutation, Phenotype, Genome, Bacterial, Conserved Sequence, Uncertainty, Mutant Proteins, Genetic Fitness, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review