Cited by 251Retinal Development and DisordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Restoration of vision after de novo genesis of rod photoreceptors in mammalian retinas

Open access
Yao, Kai, Qiu, Suo, Wang, Yanbin V., Park, Silvia J. H., Mohns, Ethan J., Mehta, Bhupesh, Liu, Xinran, Chang, Bo +4 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

In zebrafish, Müller glia (MG) are a source of retinal stem cells that can replenish damaged retinal neurons and restore vision 1. In mammals, however, MG do not spontaneously re-enter the cell cycle to generate a population of stem or progenitor cells that differentiate into retinal neurons. Nevertheless, the regenerative machinery may exist in the mammalian retina, as retinal injury can stimulate MG proliferation followed by limited neurogenesis 2-7. Therefore, there is still a fundamental question regarding whether MG-derived regeneration can be exploited to restore vision in mammalian retinas. Gene transfer of β-catenin stimulates MG proliferation in the absence of injury in mouse retinas 8. Here we report that following gene transfer of β-catenin, cell-cycle-reactivated MG can be reprogrammed to generate rod photoreceptors by subsequent gene transfer of transcription factors essential for rod cell fate specification and determination. MG-derived rods restored visual responses in Gnat1 rd17 Gnat2 cpfl3 double mutant mice, a model of congenital blindness 9,10, throughout the visual pathway from the retina to the primary visual cortex. Together, our results provide evidence of vision restoration after de novo MG-derived genesis of rod photoreceptors in mammalian retinas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0425-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gnat1 and 2 knockout mice lack expression of rod and cone α-transducin, respectively, and exhibit loss of signal transduction through these photoreceptors.

    “Gnat1 and 2 knockout mice lack expression of rod and cone α-transducin, respectively, and exhibit loss of signal transduction through these photoreceptors (Deng et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2018).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Yao et al., 2018

    The passage labeled Abstract says Gnat1rd17 mice lack rod α-transducin and that the double mutants lack photoreceptor-mediated light responses. It describes Gnat2cpfl3 mice as having *mutated* cone α-transducin, with poor cone responses by three weeks and none by nine weeks; it does not say they lack cone α-transducin expression. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many regenerative approaches that work well in young individuals often fail in older ones.

    “Many regenerative approaches that work well in young individuals often fail in older ones25,26.”

    From Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract describes successful rod-photoreceptor regeneration in mature mouse retinas, with treatment beginning at four weeks of age. Our copy does not compare outcomes in young and older individuals or say that regenerative approaches often fail with age (searched: young versus older regeneration, age-dependent failure). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Müller glia may be a target for gene therapy.

    “Müller glia, which are the most abundant glial cells in the retina and play a multifaceted role in retinal homeostasis and response to injury, including potentially photoreceptor regeneration, may be a target for gene therapy [275,276].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 251

Authors
Yao, K., Qiu, S., Wang, Y. V., Park, S. J. H., Mohns, E. J., Mehta, B., Liu, X., Chang, B., Zenisek, D., Crair, M. C., Demb, J. B., & Chen, B.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Bo
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-08
Volume
560
Issue
7719
Pages
484-488
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2885750548
Cited by
251
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey019943-13)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY014454, R01EY023105, R01-EY019943, R01EY014990, R01EY021502, R01EY024986, R01EY021372, R01EY021195, R01EY015788, P30EY026878)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
Müller cells, rod photoreceptors, vision restoration, retinal regeneration, β-catenin, cell cycle re-entry, GNAT1, GNAT2, congenital blindness, retinal stem cells, transcription factors, primary visual cortex, mouse retina
MeSH terms
Animals, Blindness, Cell Cycle, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Neuroglia, Stem Cells, Transcription Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Transducin, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Regenerative Medicine, Cell Proliferation, beta Catenin, Mice, Neurogenesis, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review