Cited by 534Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Genomic encoding of transcriptional burst kinetics

Open access
Larsson, Anton J. M., Johnsson, Per, Hagemann-Jensen, Michael, Hartmanis, Leonard, Faridani, Omid R., Reinius, Björn, Segerstolpe, Åsa, Rivera, Chloe M. +2 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

Mammalian gene expression is inherently stochastic 1,2, and results in discrete bursts of RNA molecules that are synthesized from each allele 3-7. Although transcription is known to be regulated by promoters and enhancers, it is unclear how cis-regulatory sequences encode transcriptional burst kinetics. Characterization of transcriptional bursting, including the burst size and frequency, has mainly relied on live-cell 4,6,8 or single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization 3,5,8,9 recordings of selected loci. Here we determine transcriptome-wide burst frequencies and sizes for endogenous mouse and human genes using allele-sensitive single-cell RNA sequencing. We show that core promoter elements affect burst size and uncover synergistic effects between TATA and initiator elements, which were masked at mean expression levels. Notably, we provide transcriptome-wide evidence that enhancers control burst frequencies, and demonstrate that cell-type-specific gene expression is primarily shaped by changes in burst frequencies. Together, our data show that burst frequency is primarily encoded in enhancers and burst size in core promoters, and that allelic single-cell RNA sequencing is a powerful model for investigating transcriptional kinetics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0836-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancers increase the frequency of transcriptional bursts without significantly affecting their amplitude and duration.

    “Evidence from live imaging and single-cell transcriptomics indicates that enhancers increase the frequency of transcriptional bursts without significantly affecting their amplitude and duration [310, 505, 516].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [516]

    In the passage on Sox2 enhancer deletion (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable), deletion significantly reduced burst frequency without a significant change in burst size. The paper infers burst size from parameters it says cannot be individually identified across much of the parameter space, so its result does not establish that burst amplitude and duration were each unaffected. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Levine M Tjian R Transcription regulation and animal diversity Nature 2003 424 147 151 12853946
  2. [2]Raj A van Oudenaarden A Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences Cell 2008 135 216 226 18957198 PMC3118044
  3. [4]Chubb JR Trcek T Shenoy SM Singer RH Transcriptional pulsing of a developmental gene Curr Biol 2006 16 1018 1025 16713960 PMC4764056
  4. [5]Levsky JM Shenoy SM Pezo RC Singer RH Single-cell gene expression profiling Science 2002 297 836 840 12161654
  5. [6]Suter DM Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics Science 2011 332 472 474 21415320
  6. [7]Nicolas D Phillips NE Naef F What shapes eukaryotic transcriptional bursting? Mol Biosyst 2017 10.1039/c7mb00154a 28573295 · DOI
  7. [8]Fukaya T Lim B Levine M Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting Cell 2016 166 358 368 27293191 PMC4970759
  8. [9]Bartman CR Hsu SC Hsiung CC-S Raj A Blobel GA Enhancer Regulation of Transcriptional Bursting Parameters Revealed by Forced Chromatin Looping Mol Cell 2016 62 237 247 27067601 PMC4842148
  9. [10]Walters MC Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92 7125 7129 7624382 PMC41484
  10. [11]Zabidi MA Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation Nature 2015 518 556 559 25517091 PMC6795551
  11. [12]Deng Q Ramsköld D Reinius B Sandberg R Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells Science 2014 343 193 196 24408435
  12. [14]Reinius B Sandberg R Random monoallelic expression of autosomal genes: stochastic transcription and allele-level regulation Nat Rev Genet 2015 16 653 664 26442639
  13. [15]Kim JK Marioni JC Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data Genome Biol 2013 14 R7 23360624 PMC3663116
  14. [16]Jiang Y Zhang NR Li M SCALE: modeling allele-specific gene expression by single-cell RNA sequencing Genome Biol 2017 18 74 28446220 PMC5407026
  15. [18]Dar RD Transcriptional burst frequency and burst size are equally modulated across the human genome Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109 17454 17459 23064634 PMC3491463
  16. [19]Eisenberg E Levanon EY Human housekeeping genes are compact Trends Genet 2003 19 362 365 12850439
  17. [20]Hornung G Noise-mean relationship in mutated promoters Genome Res 2012 22 2409 2417 22820945 PMC3514670
  18. [21]Tantale K A single-molecule view of transcription reveals convoys of RNA polymerases and multi-scale bursting Nat Commun 2016 7 12248 PMC4974459 27461529
  19. [22]Malecová B Gross P Boyer-Guittaut M Yavuz S Oelgeschläger T The initiator core promoter element antagonizes repression of TATA-directed transcription by negative cofactor NC2 J Biol Chem 2007 282 24767 24776 17584739
  20. [23]Li Y CRISPR reveals a distal super-enhancer required for Sox2 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells PLoS ONE 2014 9 e114485 25486255 PMC4259346
  21. [24]Merkin J Russell C Chen P Burge CB Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues Science 2012 338 1593 1599 23258891 PMC3568499
  22. [25]Padovan-Merhar O Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms Mol Cell 2015 58 339 352 25866248 PMC4402149
  23. [26]Hantsche M Cramer P Conserved RNA polymerase II initiation complex structure Curr Opin Struct Biol 2017 47 17 22 28437704
  24. [27]Roeder RG The role of general initiation factors in transcription by RNA polymerase II Trends Biochem Sci 1996 21 327 335 8870495
  25. [28]Jonkers I Lis JT Getting up to speed with transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015 16 167 177 25693130 PMC4782187

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsson, A. J. M., Johnsson, P., Hagemann-Jensen, M., Hartmanis, L., Faridani, O. R., Reinius, B., Segerstolpe, Å., Rivera, C. M., Ren, B., & Sandberg, R.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
Corresponding author
Sandberg, Rickard
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-01
Volume
565
Issue
7738
Pages
251-254
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2906180136
Cited by
534
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 2
FWCI
17.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
transcriptional bursting, burst size, burst frequency, cis-regulatory elements, core promoter, TATA box, initiator element, enhancers, allele-specific expression, stochastic gene expression, cell type-specific gene expression, transcriptome-wide analysis
MeSH terms
Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, Alleles, Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Fibroblasts, Genes, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Organ Specificity, Polymorphism, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Stochastic Processes, Transcription, Genetic, TATA Box, Sequence Deletion, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Genomics, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review