The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of breast-cancer relapse reveal late-recurring ER-positive genomic subgroups
Open accessAbstract
The rates and routes of lethal systemic spread in breast cancer are poorly understood owing to a lack of molecularly characterized patient cohorts with long-term, detailed follow-up data. Long-term follow-up is especially important for those with oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, which can recur up to two decades after initial diagnosis1–6. It is therefore essential to identify patients who have a high risk of late relapse7–9. Here we present a statistical framework that models distinct disease stages (locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, breast-cancer-related death and death from other causes) and competing risks of mortality from breast cancer, while yielding individual risk-of-recurrence predictions. We apply this model to 3,240 patients with breast cancer, including 1,980 for whom molecular data are available, and delineate spatiotemporal patterns of relapse across different categories of molecular information (namely immunohistochemical subtypes; PAM50 subtypes, which are based on gene-expression patterns10,11; and integrative or IntClust subtypes, which are based on patterns of genomic copy-number alterations and gene expression12,13). We identify four late-recurring integrative subtypes, comprising about one quarter (26%) of tumours that are both positive for ER and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, each with characteristic tumour-driving alterations in genomic copy number and a high risk of recurrence (mean 47–62%) up to 20 years after diagnosis. We also define a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancers in which cancer rarely recurs after five years, and a separate subgroup in which patients remain at risk. Use of the integrative subtypes improves the prediction of late, distant relapse beyond what is possible with clinical covariates (nodal status, tumour size, tumour grade and immunohistochemical subtype). These findings highlight opportunities for improved patient stratification and biomarker-driven clinical trials. A statistical framework for breast-cancer recurrence uses long-term follow-up data and a knowledge of molecular subcategories to model distinct disease stages and to predict the risk of relapse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J. R., Ross, D. T., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L. A., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,261
Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425 · Cited by 13,847
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,195
Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model
Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 · Cited by 8,674
Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E., & Storey, J. D. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034 · Cited by 6,231
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups
METABRIC Group, Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S.-F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., Speed, D., Lynch, A. G., Samarajiwa, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10983 · Cited by 6,097
Self-citationA Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
Dunnett, C. W. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 · Cited by 6,094
affy—analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level
Gautier, L., Cope, L., Bolstad, B. M., & Irizarry, R. A. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg405 · Cited by 5,218
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Parker, J. S., Mullins, M., Cheang, M. C. U., Leung, S., Voduc, D., Vickery, T., Davies, S., Fauron, C., He, X., Hu, Z., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1370 · Cited by 4,721
Cited by
Overcoming Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer
Hanker, A. B., Sudhan, D. R., & Arteaga, C. L. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.009 · Cited by 927
House, I. G., Savas, P., Lai, J., Chen, A. X. Y., Oliver, A. J., Teo, Z. L., Todd, K. L., Henderson, M. A., Giuffrida, L., Petley, E. V., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1868 · Cited by 790
Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic
Nolan, E., Lindeman, G. J., & Visvader, J. E. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.040 · Cited by 730
Nguyen, B., Fong, C., Luthra, A., Smith, S. A., DiNatale, R. G., Nandakumar, S., Walch, H., Chatila, W. K., Madupuri, R., Kundra, R., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.003 · Cited by 623
Wang, R., Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Liao, X., He, J., & Niu, L. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Rueda, O. M., Sammut, S.-J., Seoane, J. A., Chin, S.-F., Caswell-Jin, J. L., Callari, M., Batra, R., Pereira, B., Bruna, A., Ali, H. R., Provenzano, E., Liu, B., Parisien, M., Gillett, C., McKinney, S., Green, A. R., Murphy, L., Purushotham, A., Ellis, I. O., Pharoah, P. D., Rueda, C., Aparicio, S., Caldas, C., & Curtis, C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 567
- Issue
- 7748
- Pages
- 399-404
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2920863604
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of breast-cancer relapse reveal late-recurring ER-positive genomic subgroups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1007-8
- The paper
- Rueda, O. M., Sammut, S.-J., Seoane, J. A., Chin, S.-F., Caswell-Jin, J. L., Callari, M., Batra, R., Pereira, B., Bruna, A., Ali, H. R., Provenzano, E., Liu, B., Parisien, M., Gillett, C., McKinney, S., Green, A. R., Murphy, L., Purushotham, A., Ellis, I. O., . . . Curtis, C. (2019). Dynamics of breast-cancer relapse reveal late-recurring ER-positive genomic subgroups. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1007-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.