Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13,166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Factors Related to Late Recurrence - Later than 10 Years after the Initial Treatment - in Primary Breast Cancer

Open access
Nishimura, Reiki, Osako, Tomofumi, Nishiyama, Yasuyuki, Tashima, Rumiko, Nakano, Masahiro, Fujisue, Mamiko, Toyozumi, Yasuo, Arima, Nobuyuki·2013·Oncology

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is associated with a relatively good prognosis. Prognostic factors examined to date are related to early recurrence while those related to late recurrence and their countermeasures remain unclear. Therefore, we examined the factors related to late recurrence. Patients and Methods: From January 1980 to August 2012, 4,774 patients who underwent primary treatment and estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, those with a follow-up period <10 years and those without any recurrence at 10 years but who continued follow-up examinations. Recurrence occurred in 711 patients followed up for <10 years and in 51 patients for ≥10 years. Results: The overall 10-year cumulative disease-free survival rate was 79.5%, and the recurrence rate at ≥10 years was 5.8%. A multivariate analysis revealed that the factors related to late recurrence were PgR positivity and positive nodes. This result differed from that for early recurrence in terms of ER/PgR, Ki-67 index and p53 overexpression. Conclusion: PgR positivity and lymph node metastases significantly correlated with late recurrence. Therefore, it is important to evaluate appropriate measures such as treatment period and treatment regimen for hormone-sensitive patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000353099

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1038/35021093 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/annonc/mdr304 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s10549-006-9231-y · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s10549-007-9698-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61963-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3892/etm.2010.133 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10147-006-0601-6 · doi:10.1007/s10147-006-0601-6
  8. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.04.005 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s10549-011-1564-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1658 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/annonc/mdi280 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/jama.295.14.1658 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1186/1477-7819-9-131 · doi:10.1186/1477-7819-9-131
  15. 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s10549-009-0318-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4134 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2147/BCTT.S26431 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1110 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/bcr2143 · doi:10.1186/bcr2143

Cited by

See all 13,166

Metadata

Authors
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N.
Venue
Oncology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
100-110
ISSN
  • 0030-2414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0232
OpenAlex
W2044702943
Cited by
13,166
References
16
FWCI
323.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Factors Related to Late Recurrence - Later than 10 Years after the Initial Treatment - in Primary Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000353099
The paper
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013). Evaluation of Factors Related to Late Recurrence - Later than 10 Years after the Initial Treatment - in Primary Breast Cancer. Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.