Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb
Open accessAbstract
Coherent ranging, also known as frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) laser-based light detection and ranging (lidar)1 is used for long-range three-dimensional distance and velocimetry in autonomous driving 2,3. FMCW lidar maps distance to frequency 4,5 using frequency-chirped waveforms and simultaneously measures the Doppler shift of the reflected laser light, similar to sonar or radar 6,7 and coherent detection prevents interference from sunlight and other lidar systems. However, coherent ranging has a lower acquisition speed and requires precisely chirped 8 and highly coherent 5 laser sources, hindering widespread use of the lidar system and impeding parallelization, compared to modern time-of-flight ranging systems that use arrays of individual lasers. Here we demonstrate a massively parallel coherent lidar scheme using an ultra-low-loss photonic chip-based soliton microcomb 9. By fast chirping of the pump laser in the soliton existence range 10 of a microcomb with amplitudes of up to several gigahertz and a sweep rate of up to ten megahertz, a rapid frequency change occurs in the underlying carrier waveform of the soliton pulse stream, but the pulse-to-pulse repetition rate of the soliton pulse stream is retained. As a result, the chirp from a single narrow-linewidth pump laser is transferred to all spectral comb teeth of the soliton at once, thus enabling parallelism in the FMCW lidar. Using this approach we generate 30 distinct channels, demonstrating both parallel distance and velocity measurements at an equivalent rate of three megapixels per second, with the potential to improve sampling rates beyond 150 megapixels per second and to increase the image refresh rate of the FMCW lidar by up to two orders of magnitude without deterioration of eye safety. This approach, when combined with photonic phase arrays 11 based on nanophotonic gratings 12, provides a technological basis for compact, massively parallel and ultrahigh-frame-rate coherent lidar systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For 1D OPAs or FPAs, multi-wavelength lasers can relax wavelength tuning.
“For 1D OPAs or FPAs, multi-wavelength lasers can relax wavelength tuning28.”
From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
1 year, 1000 km: The Oxford RobotCar dataset
Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., Linegar, C., & Newman, P. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364916679498 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator
Zhang, M., Buscaino, B., Wang, C., Shams-Ansari, A., Reimer, C., Zhu, R., Kahn, J. M., & Lončar, M. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1008-7 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics
Shekhar, S., Bogaerts, W., Chrostowski, L., Bowers, J. E., Hochberg, M., Soref, R., & Shastri, B. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Corato-Zanarella, M., Gil-Molina, A., Ji, X., Shin, M. C., Mohanty, A., & Lipson, M. (2023) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-022-01120-w · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Integrated Electro-Optics on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate
Hu, Y., Zhu, D., Lu, S., Zhu, X., Song, Y., Renaud, D., Assumpcao, D., Cheng, R., Xin, C. J., Yeh, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-025-00825-5 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
- Authors
- Riemensberger, J., Lukashchuk, A., Karpov, M., Weng, W., Lucas, E., Liu, J., & Kippenberg, T. J.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Kippenberg, Tobias J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-05-13
- Volume
- 581
- Issue
- 7807
- Pages
- 164-170
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3025840600
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 16 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 55.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
- Keywords
- coherent lidar, frequency-modulated continuous-wave laser, soliton microcombs, chirped pulses, ultrafast imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review