The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research lab
Abstract
Quantum mechanics governs the microscopic world, where low mass and momentum reveal a natural wave-particle duality. Magnifying quantum behaviour to macroscopic scales is a major strength of the technique of cooling and trapping atomic gases, in which low momentum is engineered through extremely low temperatures. Advances in this field have achieved such precise control over atomic systems that gravity, often negligible when considering individual atoms, has emerged as a substantial obstacle. In particular, although weaker trapping fields would allow access to lower temperatures 1,2, gravity empties atom traps that are too weak. Additionally, inertial sensors based on cold atoms could reach better sensitivities if the free-fall time of the atoms after release from the trap could be made longer 3. Planetary orbit, specifically the condition of perpetual free-fall, offers to lift cold-atom studies beyond such terrestrial limitations. Here we report production of rubidium Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in an Earth-orbiting research laboratory, the Cold Atom Lab. We observe subnanokelvin BECs in weak trapping potentials with free-expansion times extending beyond one second, providing an initial demonstration of the advantages offered by a microgravity environment for cold-atom experiments and verifying the successful operation of this facility. With routine BEC production, continuing operations will support long-term investigations of trap topologies unique to microgravity 4,5, atom-laser sources 6, few-body physics 7,8 and pathfinding techniques for atom-wave interferometry 9-12.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“cold atom experiments have already been implemented under challenging environmental conditions [77].”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Leanhardt, A. E. et al. Adiabatic and evaporative cooling of Bose–Einstein condensates below 500 picokelvin. Science 301, 1513–1515 (2003). · DOI
- Ammann, H. & Christensen, N. Delta kick cooling: a new method for cooling atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2088–2091 (1997). · DOI
- Safronova, M. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018). · DOI
- Lundblad, N. et al. Shell potentials for microgravity Bose-Einstein condensates. npj Microgravity 5, 30 (2019). · DOI
- Meister, M., Roura, A., Rasel, E. M. & Schleich, W. P. The space atom laser: an isotropic source for ultra-cold atoms in microgravity. New J. Phys. 21, 013039 (2019). · DOI
- D’Incao, J. P., Krutzik, M., Elliott, E. & Williams, J. R. Enhanced association and dissociation of heteronuclear Feshbach molecules in a microgravity environment. Phys. Rev. A 95, 012701 (2017). · DOI
- Sackett, C. A., Lam, T. C., Stickney, J. C. & Burke, J. H. Extreme adiabatic expansion in micro-gravity: modeling for the Cold Atomic Laboratory. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 30, 155–163 (2018). · DOI
- National Research Council in Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration 249–262 (National Academies Press, 2011).
- Kovachy, T. et al. Matter wave lensing to picokelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 143004 (2015). · DOI
- Kovachy, T. et al. Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale. Nature 528, 530–533 (2015). · DOI
- Müntinga, H. et al. Interferometry with Bose–Einstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 093602 (2013). · DOI
- van Zoest, T. et al. Bose–Einstein condensation in microgravity. Science 328, 1540–1543 (2010). · DOI
- Kulas, S. et al. Miniaturized lab system for future cold atom experiments in microgravity. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 29, 37–48 (2017). · DOI
- Condon, G. et al. All-optical Bose–Einstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240402 (2019). · DOI
- Stern, G. et al. Light-pulse atom interferometry in microgravity. Eur. Phys. J. D 53, 353–357 (2009). · DOI
- Barrett, B. et al. Dual matter-wave inertial sensors in weightlessness. Nat. Commun. 7, 13786 (2016). · DOI
- Altenbuchner, L. et al. MORABA—overview on DLR’s mobile rocket base and projects. In Proc. SpaceOps 2012 Conf. (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012); https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1272497. · DOI
- Schkolnik, V. et al. A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket. Appl. Phys. B 122, 217 (2016). · DOI
- Lezius, M. et al. Space-borne frequency comb metrology. Optica 3, 1381–1387 (2016). · DOI
- Dinkelaker, A. N. et al. Autonomous frequency stabilization of two extended-cavity diode lasers at the potassium wavelength on a sounding rocket. Appl. Opt. 56, 1388–1396 (2017). · DOI
- Becker, D. et al. Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry. Nature 562, 391–395 (2018). · DOI
- Williams, J. R., Chiow, S.-W., Yu, N. & Müller, H. Quantum test of the equivalence principle and space-time aboard the international space station. New J. Phys. 18, 025018 (2016). · DOI
- Aguilera, D. N. et al. STE-QUEST-test of the universality of free fall using cold atom interferometry. Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 115010 (2014). · DOI
- Kolkowitz, S. et al. Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- Hogan, J. M. & Kasevich, M. A. Atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detection using heterodyne laser links. Phys. Rev. A 94, 033632 (2016). · DOI
- Hogan, J. M. et al. An atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor in low Earth orbit (AGIS-LEO). Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1953–2009 (2011). · DOI
- Yu, N. & Tinto, M. Gravitational wave detection with single-laser atom interferometers. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1943–1952 (2011). · DOI
- Kómár, P. et al. A quantum network of clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 582–587 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Elder, B. et al. Chameleon dark energy and atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. D 94, 044051 (2016). · DOI
- Yu, N., Kohel, J. M., Kellogg, J. R. & Maleki, L. Development of an atom-interferometer gravity gradiometer for gravity measurement from space. Appl. Phys. B 84, 647–652 (2006). · DOI
- Sorrentino, F. et al. The space atom interferometer project: status and prospects. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 327, 012050 (2011). · DOI
- Chiow, S.-W. & Yu, N. Compact atom interferometer using single laser. Appl. Phys. B 124, 96 (2018). · DOI
- Battelier, B. et al. Development of compact cold-atom sensors for inertial navigation. Proc. SPIE Quant. Opt. 9900, 990004 (2016). · DOI
- Fang, B. et al. Metrology with atom interferometry: inertial sensors from laboratory to field applications. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723, 012049 (2016). · DOI
- Elliott, E. R., Krutzik, M. C., Williams, J. R., Thompson, R. J. & Aveline, D. C. NASA’s Cold Atom Lab (CAL): system development and ground test status. npj Microgravity 4, 16 (2018). · DOI
- Farkas, D. M., Salim, E. A. & Ramirez-Serrano, J. Production of rubidium Bose–Einstein condensates at a 1 Hz rate. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1403.4641v2 (2014). · arXiv
- Jenkins, F. A. & Segrè, E. The quadratic Zeeman effect. Phys. Rev. 55, 52–58 (1939). · DOI
- Chaudhary, G. K., Chattopadhyay, A. & Ramakumar, R. Bose–Einstein condensate in a quartic potential: static and dynamic properties. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 25, 3927–3940 (2012). · DOI
- Tino, G. & Kasevich, M. Atom Interferometry (IOS Press, 2014).
- Côté, R., Gould, P. L., Rozman, M. & Smith, W. S. (eds) Precision measurements. In Pushing the Frontiers of Atomic Physics: Proc. XXI Int. Conf. on Atomic Physics, 47–87 (World Scientific, 2009).
- Frye, K. et al. The Bose–Einstein condensate and cold atom laboratory. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1912.04849 (2019). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective
Wintersperger, K., Dommert, F., Ehmer, T., Hoursanov, A., Klepsch, J., Mauerer, W., Reuber, G., Strohm, T., Yin, M., & Luber, S. (2023) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00190-1 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Aveline, D. C., Williams, J. R., Elliott, E. R., Dutenhoffer, C., Kellogg, J. R., Kohel, J. M., Lay, N. E., Oudrhiri, K., Shotwell, R. F., Yu, N., & Thompson, R. J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aveline, David C.
- Thompson, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-06-11
- Volume
- 582
- Issue
- 7811
- Pages
- 193-197
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3034785477
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 18
- FWCI
- 15.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-07-17)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Keywords
- Bose-Einstein condensate, microgravity, rubidium atoms, low Earth orbit, inertial sensors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review