Cited by 243Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesStrong Light-Matter InteractionsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in an Earth-orbiting research lab

Abstract

Quantum mechanics governs the microscopic world, where low mass and momentum reveal a natural wave-particle duality. Magnifying quantum behaviour to macroscopic scales is a major strength of the technique of cooling and trapping atomic gases, in which low momentum is engineered through extremely low temperatures. Advances in this field have achieved such precise control over atomic systems that gravity, often negligible when considering individual atoms, has emerged as a substantial obstacle. In particular, although weaker trapping fields would allow access to lower temperatures 1,2, gravity empties atom traps that are too weak. Additionally, inertial sensors based on cold atoms could reach better sensitivities if the free-fall time of the atoms after release from the trap could be made longer 3. Planetary orbit, specifically the condition of perpetual free-fall, offers to lift cold-atom studies beyond such terrestrial limitations. Here we report production of rubidium Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in an Earth-orbiting research laboratory, the Cold Atom Lab. We observe subnanokelvin BECs in weak trapping potentials with free-expansion times extending beyond one second, providing an initial demonstration of the advantages offered by a microgravity environment for cold-atom experiments and verifying the successful operation of this facility. With routine BEC production, continuing operations will support long-term investigations of trap topologies unique to microgravity 4,5, atom-laser sources 6, few-body physics 7,8 and pathfinding techniques for atom-wave interferometry 9-12.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2346-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Leanhardt, A. E. et al. Adiabatic and evaporative cooling of Bose–Einstein condensates below 500 picokelvin. Science 301, 1513–1515 (2003). · DOI
  2. Ammann, H. & Christensen, N. Delta kick cooling: a new method for cooling atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2088–2091 (1997). · DOI
  3. Safronova, M. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018). · DOI
  4. Lundblad, N. et al. Shell potentials for microgravity Bose-Einstein condensates. npj Microgravity 5, 30 (2019). · DOI
  5. Meister, M., Roura, A., Rasel, E. M. & Schleich, W. P. The space atom laser: an isotropic source for ultra-cold atoms in microgravity. New J. Phys. 21, 013039 (2019). · DOI
  6. D’Incao, J. P., Krutzik, M., Elliott, E. & Williams, J. R. Enhanced association and dissociation of heteronuclear Feshbach molecules in a microgravity environment. Phys. Rev. A 95, 012701 (2017). · DOI
  7. Sackett, C. A., Lam, T. C., Stickney, J. C. & Burke, J. H. Extreme adiabatic expansion in micro-gravity: modeling for the Cold Atomic Laboratory. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 30, 155–163 (2018). · DOI
  8. National Research Council in Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration 249–262 (National Academies Press, 2011).
  9. Kovachy, T. et al. Matter wave lensing to picokelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 143004 (2015). · DOI
  10. Kovachy, T. et al. Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale. Nature 528, 530–533 (2015). · DOI
  11. Müntinga, H. et al. Interferometry with Bose–Einstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 093602 (2013). · DOI
  12. van Zoest, T. et al. Bose–Einstein condensation in microgravity. Science 328, 1540–1543 (2010). · DOI
  13. Kulas, S. et al. Miniaturized lab system for future cold atom experiments in microgravity. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 29, 37–48 (2017). · DOI
  14. Condon, G. et al. All-optical Bose–Einstein condensates in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240402 (2019). · DOI
  15. Stern, G. et al. Light-pulse atom interferometry in microgravity. Eur. Phys. J. D 53, 353–357 (2009). · DOI
  16. Barrett, B. et al. Dual matter-wave inertial sensors in weightlessness. Nat. Commun. 7, 13786 (2016). · DOI
  17. Altenbuchner, L. et al. MORABA—overview on DLR’s mobile rocket base and projects. In Proc. SpaceOps 2012 Conf. (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012); https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1272497. · DOI
  18. Schkolnik, V. et al. A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket. Appl. Phys. B 122, 217 (2016). · DOI
  19. Lezius, M. et al. Space-borne frequency comb metrology. Optica 3, 1381–1387 (2016). · DOI
  20. Dinkelaker, A. N. et al. Autonomous frequency stabilization of two extended-cavity diode lasers at the potassium wavelength on a sounding rocket. Appl. Opt. 56, 1388–1396 (2017). · DOI
  21. Becker, D. et al. Space-borne Bose–Einstein condensation for precision interferometry. Nature 562, 391–395 (2018). · DOI
  22. Williams, J. R., Chiow, S.-W., Yu, N. & Müller, H. Quantum test of the equivalence principle and space-time aboard the international space station. New J. Phys. 18, 025018 (2016). · DOI
  23. Aguilera, D. N. et al. STE-QUEST-test of the universality of free fall using cold atom interferometry. Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 115010 (2014). · DOI
  24. Kolkowitz, S. et al. Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hogan, J. M. & Kasevich, M. A. Atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detection using heterodyne laser links. Phys. Rev. A 94, 033632 (2016). · DOI
  26. Hogan, J. M. et al. An atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor in low Earth orbit (AGIS-LEO). Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1953–2009 (2011). · DOI
  27. Yu, N. & Tinto, M. Gravitational wave detection with single-laser atom interferometers. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1943–1952 (2011). · DOI
  28. Kómár, P. et al. A quantum network of clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 582–587 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Elder, B. et al. Chameleon dark energy and atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. D 94, 044051 (2016). · DOI
  30. Yu, N., Kohel, J. M., Kellogg, J. R. & Maleki, L. Development of an atom-interferometer gravity gradiometer for gravity measurement from space. Appl. Phys. B 84, 647–652 (2006). · DOI
  31. Sorrentino, F. et al. The space atom interferometer project: status and prospects. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 327, 012050 (2011). · DOI
  32. Chiow, S.-W. & Yu, N. Compact atom interferometer using single laser. Appl. Phys. B 124, 96 (2018). · DOI
  33. Battelier, B. et al. Development of compact cold-atom sensors for inertial navigation. Proc. SPIE Quant. Opt. 9900, 990004 (2016). · DOI
  34. Fang, B. et al. Metrology with atom interferometry: inertial sensors from laboratory to field applications. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723, 012049 (2016). · DOI
  35. Elliott, E. R., Krutzik, M. C., Williams, J. R., Thompson, R. J. & Aveline, D. C. NASA’s Cold Atom Lab (CAL): system development and ground test status. npj Microgravity 4, 16 (2018). · DOI
  36. Farkas, D. M., Salim, E. A. & Ramirez-Serrano, J. Production of rubidium Bose–Einstein condensates at a 1 Hz rate. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1403.4641v2 (2014). · arXiv
  37. Jenkins, F. A. & Segrè, E. The quadratic Zeeman effect. Phys. Rev. 55, 52–58 (1939). · DOI
  38. Chaudhary, G. K., Chattopadhyay, A. & Ramakumar, R. Bose–Einstein condensate in a quartic potential: static and dynamic properties. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 25, 3927–3940 (2012). · DOI
  39. Tino, G. & Kasevich, M. Atom Interferometry (IOS Press, 2014).
  40. Côté, R., Gould, P. L., Rozman, M. & Smith, W. S. (eds) Precision measurements. In Pushing the Frontiers of Atomic Physics: Proc. XXI Int. Conf. on Atomic Physics, 47–87 (World Scientific, 2009).
  41. Frye, K. et al. The Bose–Einstein condensate and cold atom laboratory. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1912.04849 (2019). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aveline, D. C., Williams, J. R., Elliott, E. R., Dutenhoffer, C., Kellogg, J. R., Kohel, J. M., Lay, N. E., Oudrhiri, K., Shotwell, R. F., Yu, N., & Thompson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Aveline, David C.
  • Thompson, Robert J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
582
Issue
7811
Pages
193-197
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3034785477
Cited by
243
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 18
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
Bose-Einstein condensate, microgravity, rubidium atoms, low Earth orbit, inertial sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review